Cited by 44Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCancer survivorship and care

Validation of POMS questionnaire in postmenopausal women

Wyrwich, Kathleen W., Yu, Holly·2011·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) in postmenopausal women with moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms.Methods Internal consistency, validity, and reliability of the POMS were examined using blinded data from 539 postmenopausal women with ≥50 moderate to severe hot flushes per week at baseline enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) for vasomotor symptoms.Results The POMS subscales and total score demonstrated sound internal consistency reliability (α ≥ 0.84). Comparisons between POMS subscales and Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) scores with Greene Climacteric Scale domains provided consistent known-groups and construct validity. Results from the confirmatory factor analysis were supportive of the second-order factor structure (root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.078). For women with POMS TMD scores below the US adult female norms, there was little mean change at Week 12 but marked mean improvement in women with greater mood symptoms scoring worse than the norm at baseline.Conclusion These data demonstrate the internal consistency and validity of the POMS to measure mood among postmenopausal women with moderate to severe hot flushes and the responsiveness of the POMS among these women with greater mood symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-011-9846-2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyrwich, K. W., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
Wyeth (US)
Corresponding author
Wyrwich, Kathleen W.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2011-01-29
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
1111-1121
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2089314438
Cited by
44
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
Profile of Mood States, postmenopausal women, vasomotor symptoms, hot flashes, mood symptoms, total mood disturbance, desvenlafaxine, questionnaire validation, psychometric properties, construct validity, internal consistency, factor structure, known-groups validity, menopause
MeSH terms
Affect, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Vasomotor System, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review