The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychometric properties and factorial analysis of invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in cancer patients
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), evaluate the measurement invariance with respect to sex, age, and tumor location, as well as analyze associations between life satisfaction and socio-demographic and clinical variables among individuals with resected, non-advanced cancer. Methods A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to explore the dimensionality of the scale and test invariance across gender, age, and tumor localization in a prospective, multicenter cohort of 713 patients who completed the following scales: SWLS, Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18). Results Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the SWLS is an essentially unidimensional instrument, providing accurate scores: both McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha estimates were 0.91. Strong measurement invariance was found to hold across gender, age, and tumor localization. Low satisfaction with life was associated with psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, and somatization), and decreased quality of life (malfunction, symptoms, poor global QoL). Conclusion The SWLS is a reliable, valid satisfaction with life measurement among people with cancer and should be recommended as an indicator of psychological adjustment in oncological patients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lorenzo-Seva et al. (2019) found that cancer survivors had slightly elevated SWL scores compared to healthy controls, with many participants endorsing the statement ‘life has given them a second chance’.”
From Cancer, now what? A cross-sectional study examining physical symptoms, subjective well-being, and psychological flexibility (2023) · cites this paper as Lorenzo-Seva et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective
Hair, J. F. (2010) · Cited by 12,255
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003) · Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau · doi:10.23668/psycharchives.12784 · Cited by 8,975
Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012
Ferlay, J., Steliarova-Foucher, E., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Rosso, S., Coebergh, J. W. W., Comber, H., Forman, D., & Bray, F. (2013) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027 · Cited by 5,263
Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5 · Cited by 3,519
Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61489-0 · Cited by 2,455
The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760701756946 · Cited by 2,396
A checklist for testing measurement invariance
van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.686740 · Cited by 2,064
Little, T. D. (1997) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3 · Cited by 1,393
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Derogatis, L. R. (2001). BSI 18, Brief symptom inventory 18: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson, Inc.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’ss guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Cited by
Proctor, C. J., Reiman, A. J., & Best, L. A. (2023) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2023.2266220 · Cited by 11
“Lorenzo-Seva et al. (2019) found that cancer survivors had slightly elevated SWL scores compared to healthy controls, with many participants endorsing the statement ‘life has given them a second chance’.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenzo-Seva, U., Calderon, C., Ferrando, P. J., del Mar Muñoz, M., Beato, C., Ghanem, I., Castelo, B., Carmona-Bayonas, A., Hernández, R., & Jiménez-Fonseca, P.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
- Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
- Hospital Universitario de Canarias (ES)
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2019-01-14
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1255-1264
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2910527267
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Repositori institucional URV (Universitat Rovira i Virgili) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- FSEOM2015 (Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) in 2015)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- Satisfaction with Life Scale, life satisfaction, cancer patients, measurement invariance, psychometric properties, psychological adjustment, anxiety, depression, somatization, quality of life, tumor location, sex differences, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Emotional Adjustment, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Demography, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Personal Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.