Beyond earnings quality: evaluating the quality of corporate disclosure practices
Open accessAbstract
We propose a framework to assess the decision-usefulness of heterogeneous disclosure practices that managers use to convey information to market participants. We illustrate an application of our framework to non-GAAP earnings, management earnings guidance, and earnings conference calls. We first identify key quality attributes for each disclosure practice and then develop a list of quality metrics that we apply to a small pilot sample. We focus on metrics that are easily measured in real time and discuss the practical challenges of conducting assessments of disclosure quality at the firm-quarter-disclosure level. Our descriptive analysis provides preliminary insights into whether and how voluntary disclosure quality varies across firms and highlights the interconnectedness of these disclosure practices. We discuss future research opportunities to expand and fine-tune the application of the framework to develop a comprehensive disclosure quality assessment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 210 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Loh, W. T., & McVay, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Singapore Management University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Dechow, Patricia M.
- Venue
- Review of Accounting Studies
- Published
- 2026-07-24
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1567-1637
- ISSN
- 1380-6653 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7136
- OpenAlex
- W7170750981
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Review of Accounting Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Southern California
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Financial Reporting and XBRL
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Keywords
- disclosure quality, voluntary disclosure, non-GAAP earnings, earnings conference calls, decision usefulness, earnings quality, corporate disclosure practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review