Cited by 261Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition

Bowers, Peter N., Kirby, John R.·2010·Reading and Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morphological awareness has long been known to influence reading comprehension outcomes.

    “Morphological awareness has long been known to influence reading comprehension outcomes, and has received interest as a potential target for literacy interventions (Bowers & Kirby, 2010;Goodwin & Ahn, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bowers, Peter N.
Venue
Reading and Writing
Published
2009-04-02
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
515-537
ISSN
  • 0922-4777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0905
OpenAlex
W2158875680
Cited by
261
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading and Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
morphological instruction, vocabulary acquisition, derivational morphology, morphological analysis, base words, novel words, vocabulary knowledge, elementary school students, word learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review