Cited by 76Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

Inside Incidental Word Learning: Children's Strategic Use of Morphological Information to Infer Word Meanings

McCutchen, Deborah, Logan, Becky·2011·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

This study examined whether morphological analysis may be a mechanism underlying the relationship of morphological awareness to vocabulary and comprehension. Eighty‐eight fifth‐ and 74 eighth‐grade students completed a task designed to assess whether students use morphological analysis to infer meanings of low‐frequency, presumably unfamiliar, words. Students chose a definition from among three alternatives for low‐frequency, morphologically accessible words or approximate synonyms that were less morphologically accessible, both within the same sentence context. In addition, they chose definitions for 18 nonsense words that were also designed to afford differential access via morphological analysis. Students were more accurate with morphologically accessible items (words and nonwords) than less accessible items, suggesting that students can use morphological analysis to infer word meanings. Regression analyses indicated that skill in morphological analysis accounted for unique variance in vocabulary and comprehension for both age groups. These results have implications for theoretical accounts of how morphological awareness may support students’ vocabulary growth and comprehension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rrq.003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morphological and contextual inferencing have both been found to be related to decoding, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills.

    “Morphological and contextual inferencing have largely been investigated separately in the literature on reading development, and both have been found to be related to decoding, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills (e.g., Cain, Oakhill, & Elbro, 2003;McCutchen & Logan, 2011;Zhang & Shulley, 2017).”
  • Children with good reading comprehension skills were better at morphological inferencing than children with poorer reading comprehension.

    “Our results also show that children with good reading comprehension skills were better at morphological inferencing than children with poorer reading comprehension, in line with earlier research (McCutchen & Logan, 2011;Zhang & Shulley, 2017).”
  • Young readers can use context and morphology in their word meaning inferences.

    “Our research confirms findings from the literature that young readers can use context and morphology in their word meaning inferences (e.g., Cain et al., 2003;Joseph & Nation, 2018;McCutchen & Logan, 2011;Ricketts et al., 2011;Zhang & Shulley, 2017)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCutchen, D., & Logan, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Washington Seattle USA
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
334-349
ISSN
  • 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2722
OpenAlex
W1540975650
Cited by
76
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Education Sciences
  • U.S. Department of Education (R305H060073)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
incidental vocabulary learning, morphological awareness, morphological analysis, word meaning inference, vocabulary development, reading comprehension, low-frequency words, pseudowords, synonyms, junior high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review