Cited by 62Reading and Literacy DevelopmentMultilingual Education and PolicyLanguage Development and Disorders

Cross-language transfer of reading skills: an empirical investigation of bidirectionality and the influence of instructional environments

Kim, Young-Suk Grace, Piper, Benjamin·2019·Reading and Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11145-018-9889-7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y.-S. G., & Piper, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Young-Suk Grace
Venue
Reading and Writing
Published
2018-08-01
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
839-871
ISSN
  • 0922-4777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0905
OpenAlex
W2886444500
Cited by
62
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading and Writing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • USAID (AID-623-M-11-00001)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305A180055)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
cross-language transfer, linguistic interdependence hypothesis, second language literacy, multilingual children, literacy education, phonological awareness, grapheme-phoneme correspondence, Swahili language, English language, early reading acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review