Metabolic effects of contraceptive steroids
Abstract
Estrogen and progestins have been used by millions of women as effective combined contraceptives. The safety of hormonal contraceptives has been documented by years of follow-up and serious adverse events that may be related to their use are rare in the young population exposed to these agents. The balance between the benefits and the risks of contraceptive steroids is generally positive in particular when comparing to the risks of pregnancy and especially in women with risk factors. The metabolic changes induced by the synthetic steroids used in contraception, such as lipoprotein changes, insulin response to glucose, and coagulation factors have been considered as potential markers of cardiovascular and venous risk. Observations of these effects have led to modifications of the composition of hormonal contraceptive in order to minimize these changes and hence potentially decrease the risks. The synthetic estrogen Ethinyl-Estradiol (EE) exerts a stronger effect that natural estradiol (E2) on hepatic metabolism including estrogen-dependent markers such as liver proteins. This stronger hepatic impact of EE has been related to its 17α-ethinyl group which prevents the inactivation of the molecule and results in a more pronounced hepatic effect of EE as compared to estradiol. Due to its strong activity, administering EE via a non-oral route does not prevent its impact on liver proteins. In order to circumvent the metabolic changes induced by EE, newer products using more natural compounds such as estradiol (E2) and estradiol valerate (E2V) have been introduced. The synthetic progestins used for contraception are structurally related either to testosterone (T) (estranes and gonanes) or to progesterone (pregnanes and 19-norpregnanes). Several new progestins have been designed to bind more specifically to the progesterone receptor and to minimize side-effects related to androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid receptor interactions. Dienogest (DNG), and drospirenone (DRSP) and the 19-norpregnanes including Nestorone® (NES), nomegestrol acetate (NOMAc) and trimegestone (TMG) have been combined with estrogen either EE or E2 or estradiol valerate (E2V). Risks and benefits of the newer progestins used in contraception depend upon the type of molecular structure, the type and dose of estrogen associated in a combination and the route of administration. The lower metabolic impact of estradiol-based combinations may result in an improved safety profile, but large surveillance studies are warranted to confirm this plausible hypothesis. So far, the contraindications and warnings for use of current COCs also apply to the estradiol-based COCs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Estrogens have a positive effect on lipid metabolism, increasing HDL-C and decreasing LDL-C, while progestins, depending on their type and androgenicity, may counteract these positive estrogenic effects.
“Estrogens have a positive effect on lipid metabolism, increasing HDL-C and decreasing LDL-C, while progestins, depending on their type and androgenicity, may counteract these positive estrogenic effects [23-25] .”
From Endocrine and metabolic effects of an oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 161
- Authors
- Sitruk-Ware, R., & Nath, A.
- Affiliations
- Population Council (US)
- Population Council (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sitruk-Ware, Regine
- Venue
- Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Published
- 2011-05-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 63-75
- ISSN
- 1389-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2606
- OpenAlex
- W2010465686
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Keywords
- estrogen, progestins, ethinyl estradiol, estradiol valerate, hepatic metabolism, insulin response, coagulation factors, cardiovascular risk, venous thromboembolism, dienogest, drospirenone
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Estrogens, Female, Hemostasis, Homeostasis, Humans, Liver, Progestins, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Lipid Metabolism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review