Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anaerobic digestion without biogas?

Open access
Kleerebezem, Robbert, Joosse, Bart, Rozendal, Rene, Van Loosdrecht, Mark C. M.·2015·Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion for the production of methane containing biogas is the classic example of a resource recovery process that combines stabilization of particulate organic matter or wastewater treatment with the production of a valuable end-product. Attractive features of the process include the production of a single end-product from a heterogeneous feedstock, and in-situ product separation of the gaseous end-product. Despite these intrinsic attractive properties of the process, the economic added value of the biogas produced is limited, enabling the development of alternative processes that yield higher-value end-products. Typically the production of higher value end-products from low value feedstock and industrial wastewater proceeds via intermediate production of organic acids (and carbon dioxide and molecular hydrogen). Optimization of organic acid production from particulate feedstocks and wastewater for development of the organic acid based resource recovery route receives significant research attention. The organic acid stream generated as such, has no economic value, but if organic acids can either be concentrated via membrane separation or (bio)converted to an end-product that can easily be separated from the liquid, an attractive biomass processing scheme can be developed. Attractive end-products of organic acid processing include polyhydroxyalkanoates, medium chain length fatty acids, or other organic molecules using bio-electrochemical systems. Overall we suggest that these novel bioprocessing routes for conversion of low value feedstock to higher added value products will contribute to a sustainable future and will change the economic status of organic waste.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11157-015-9374-6

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Kleerebezem, R., Joosse, B., Rozendal, R., & Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.
Venue
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
Published
2015-09-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
787-801
ISSN
  • 1569-1705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9826
OpenAlex
W2168051180
Cited by
363
References
50
FWCI
28.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaerobic digestion without biogas? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11157-015-9374-6
The paper
Kleerebezem, R., Joosse, B., Rozendal, R., & Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2015). Anaerobic digestion without biogas? Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9374-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.