Integrated approach to determining stock structure: implications for fisheries management of sardine, Sardinops sagax, in Australian waters
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of different approaches has proved to be a powerful and reliable way to clarify unresolved questions related to stock structure.
“the combination of different approaches has proved to be a powerful and reliable way to clarify unresolved questions related to stock structure (Welch et al., 2015; Pita et al., 2016; Izzo et al., 2017; Proctor et al., 2019)”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Izzo et al., 2017
Cites
Worldwide large-scale fluctuations of sardine and anchovy populations
Schwartzlose, R. A., Alheit, J., Bakun, A., Baumgartner, T. R., Cloete, R., Crawford, R. J. M., Fletcher, W. J., Green-Ruiz, Y., Hagen, E., Kawasaki, T., et al. (1999) · South African Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.2989/025776199784125962 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Fishing for Feed or Fishing for Food: Increasing Global Competition for Small Pelagic Forage Fish
Metian, A. G. J. T. M. (2009) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/08-a-574.1 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Izzo, C., Ward, T. M., Ivey, A. R., Suthers, I. M., Stewart, J., Sexton, S. C., & Gillanders, B. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Flinders University (AU)
- South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ward, Tim M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
- Published
- 2017-01-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 267-284
- ISSN
- 0960-3166 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5184
- OpenAlex
- W2583030972
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries (publishedVersion)
- UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (2009/021)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- sardine, Sardinops sagax, stock structure, metapopulation, otolith microchemistry, otolith shape, small pelagic fish, stock differentiation, Australian waters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
