A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean
Open accessAbstract
Skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (Thunnus obesus) tuna are the target species of tropical tuna fisheries in the Indian Ocean, with high commercial value in the international market. High fishing pressure over the past three decades has raised concerns about their sustainability. Understanding life history strategies and stock structure is essential to determine species resilience and how they might respond to exploitation. Here we provide a comprehensive review of available knowledge on the biology, ecology, and stock structure of tropical tuna species in the Indian Ocean. We describe the characteristics of Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries and synthesize skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye tuna key life history attributes such as biogeography, trophic ecology, growth, and reproductive biology. In addition, we evaluate the available literature about their stock structure using different approaches such as analysis of fisheries data, genetic markers, otolith microchemistry and tagging, among others. Based on this review, we conclude that there is a clear lack of ocean basin-scale studies on skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna life history, and that regional stock structure studies indicate that the panmictic population assumption of these stocks should be investigated further. Finally, we identify specific knowledge gaps that should be addressed with priority to ensure a sustainable and effective management of these species.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries, life history, and stock structure for skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye tuna, concluding that basin-scale life-history studies are lacking and that the current single-stock/panmictic management assumption should be investigated further. It identifies major knowledge gaps in growth, reproduction, habitat use, and stock delineation that increase uncertainty in assessment and management.
Key findings
- Tropical tunas represented 53% of total IOTC catches in 2018; skipjack contributed ~53%, yellowfin ~38%, and bigeye ~9% of tropical tuna catches, with total tropical tuna landings of 1,130,359 t in 2018. Artisanal fisheries accounted for around 50% of total Indian Ocean tuna catches overall and ~43% in 2018.
- Growth parameters vary widely in the Indian Ocean: skipjack reported k = 0.23–1.41 year⁻¹ and L∞ = 60.6–94.8 cm FL; yellowfin k = 0.18–1.54 and L∞ = 123.6–272.7 cm FL; bigeye k = 0.06–0.45 (mean 0.22) and L∞ = 150.9–423.0 cm FL. Skipjack is the fastest-growing tuna, while bigeye has the greatest life expectancy, with a proposed maximum age of at least 16 years.
- Current stock assessments assume single Indian-wide stocks for all three species, based largely on RTTP-IO tagging evidence of rapid, large-scale movements (e.g., average monthly skipjack distance of 1066 miles in the first year; bigeye 918 miles). However, fisheries data, genetics, parasites, and otolith microchemistry often indicate more fragmented structure, so the panmictic assumption should be investigated further.
- The review identifies priority gaps: lack of ocean-basin-scale life-history studies, unresolved spawning time/location, inconsistent growth and reproductive parameters, and the need for integrated stock-delineation methods including genomics, otolith microchemistry, parasites, and electronic tagging.
Methods
- This is a comprehensive literature review, not a primary data study. It describes Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries and synthesizes published knowledge on biogeography, trophic ecology, growth, reproductive biology, and stock structure for skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye tuna.
- Stock-structure evidence is evaluated across multiple approaches: fisheries catch/effort and size data, morphometric and meristic characters, parasites, genetic markers, otolith microchemistry, and conventional tagging.
- The paper uses IOTC catch statistics and published studies, including figures and tables, to summarize spatiotemporal fishery patterns, life-history parameters, spawning seasonality, and knowledge gaps.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: there is a clear lack of ocean basin-scale studies on life history; most studies are regionally limited. Tagging programs do not represent the whole Indian Ocean, few tags have been returned from the eastern Indian Ocean, and reporting rates by longliners there are poor. Single molecular markers can give contradictory stock-structure results, and no NGS-based tropical tuna stock studies have yet been published for the Indian Ocean.
- Stated in the paper: spawning frequency of tropical tuna in the Indian Ocean has not been reported yet, and there is no consensus on spawning time and location. Growth and reproduction parameters show discrepancies that increase assessment uncertainty.
- Evident from the text: as a review, the conclusions depend on the availability, quality, and spatial coverage of existing literature and fishery data; it cannot resolve contradictions among primary studies or fill the identified data gaps with new empirical analyses.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
15 of 119 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
Reported individual fecundity for skipjack tuna in the western Indian Ocean ranges from 80,000 oocytes for a 44 cm FL female to 1.25 million oocytes for a 75 cm FL female.
“Reported individual fecundity for skipjack tuna range from 80,000 oocytes for a 44 cm FL female to 1.25 million oocytes for a large (75 cm FL) female in the western Indian Ocean (Stéquert and Ramcharrun, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Stéquert and Ramcharrun, 1995 source
The sections on fecundity versus fork length and fishing area (page unavailable) report fecundity measurements for western Indian Ocean skipjack, including females as small as 44 cm. However, the passages do not establish the claimed endpoints of 80,000 oocytes at 44 cm and 1.25 million at 75 cm; searches for those numbers and sizes did not locate them in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 12
Female yellowfin tuna are considered mixed income-capital breeders.
“Female yellowfin tuna however, are considered to be mixed income-capital breeders (Zudaire et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zudaire et al., 2014 source
- Premisecitation§ 4.1. Fisheries Data · p. 15
A study based on size composition of skipjack caught by longline vessels in the Indian Ocean during 1972-1975 reported relatively smaller specimens in the central and eastern Indian Ocean.
“A study based on size composition of skipjack caught by longline vessels in the Indian Ocean during 1972-1975, reported relatively smaller specimens in the central and eastern Indian Ocean (Pillai and Silas, 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pillai and Silas, 1979
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18
Using genome wide SNPs, Barth et al. (2017) found genetic differentiation of yellowfin tuna from the Arabian Sea with respect to those from the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific.
“Using genome wide SNPs, Barth et al. (2017) found genetic differentiation of yellowfin tuna from the Arabian Sea with respect to those from the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Barth et al., 2017 source
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 16
Fujino et al. (1981) found significant differences in allozyme allele frequencies in skipjack from the Indian Ocean compared to those collected both from the Atlantic and western Pacific Oceans.
“Also at the inter-oceanic scale, Fujino et al. (1981) found significant differences in allozyme allele frequencies in skipjack from the Indian Ocean compared to those collected both from the Atlantic and western Pacific Oceans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fujino et al., 1981 source
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17
In the eastern Indian Ocean, results from three microsatellite loci suggest the presence of two stocks of skipjack tuna in Indonesian waters, with genetic differentiation between skipjack from west of Sumatra and south of Java.
“In the eastern Indian Ocean, the results from three microsatellite loci suggest the presence of two stocks of skipjack tuna in Indonesian waters, with genetic differentiation between skipjack from west of Sumatra and south of Java (Jatmiko et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jatmiko et al., 2019 source
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17
Using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), Pecoraro et al. (2018) identified genetic differentiation of yellowfin tuna between Indian, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
“Using genomic wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), Pecoraro et al. (2018) identified genetic differentiation of yellowfin tuna between Indian, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pecoraro et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18
Mitochondrial and nuclear microsatellite loci variations of yellowfin tuna collected from six fishing grounds around Sri Lanka and one in Maldives suggested the existence of discrete yellowfin tuna populations in the northwest Indian Ocean.
“In contrast, mitochondrial and nuclear microsatellite loci variations of yellowfin tuna collected from six fishing grounds around Sri Lanka and one in Maldives, suggested the existence of discrete yellowfin tuna populations in the northwest Indian Ocean (Dammannagoda et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dammannagoda et al., 2008 source
- Findingnone given§ Abstract : · p. 1
There is a clear lack of ocean basin-scale studies on skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna life history.
“Based on this review, we conclude that there is a clear lack of ocean basin-scale studies on skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna life history”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
In the eastern Indian Ocean, estimated batch fecundity for yellowfin tuna varied from 0.3 to 5.3 million oocytes in females.
“In the case of yellowfin tuna, estimated batch fecundity varied from 0.3 to 5.3 million oocytes in females from the eastern Indian Ocean (Nootmorn et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nootmorn et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
In the western Indian Ocean, mean batch fecundity for female yellowfin tuna 79-147 cm FL is estimated at 3.1 million oocytes.
“In the western Indian Ocean mean batch fecundity for female yellowfin tuna 79-147 cm FL was estimated at 3.1 million oocytes (Zudaire et al., 2013a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zudaire et al., 2013a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
In the western Indian Ocean, L50 of yellowfin tuna is estimated at 75.0 cm to 102.0 cm FL, depending on the threshold oocyte development stage considered to indicate maturity.
“In the western Indian Ocean, L50 of yellowfin tuna was estimated at 75.0 cm to 102.0 cm FL, depending on the threshold oocyte development stage considered to indicate maturity (i.e., cortical alveolar vs. vitellogenic) (Zudaire et al., 2013a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zudaire et al., 2013a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
In the western Indian Ocean, skipjack tuna has a higher mean relative batch fecundity (140.0±64.0 oocyte g-1 of gonad-free weight) than yellowfin (74.4 oocyte g-1) and bigeye (11.5±7.1 oocyte g-1).
“Studies carried out in the western Indian Ocean show that skipjack tuna has a higher mean relative batch fecundity, 140.0±64.0 oocyte g -1 of gonad-free weight (Grande et al., 2014), than yellowfin, 74.4 oocyte g -1 of gonad-free weight (Zudaire et al., 2013a), and bigeye tuna, 11.5±7.1 oocyte g -1 of gonad-free fish (Zudaire et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Grande et al., 2014 source
- cites Zudaire et al., 2013a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zudaire et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
Mean size at maturity (L50) for female skipjack tuna in the western Indian Ocean is estimated between 39.9 cm and 42.0 cm FL.
“Mean size at maturity, i.e., length at which 50% of female skipjack tuna are classed as mature (L50), has been estimated at between 39.9 cm and 42.0 cm FL in the western Indian Ocean (Stéquert, 1976; Grande et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Stéquert, 1976
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Grande et al., 2014 source
- Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 3
Mis-assessment and mis-management of a species can lead to stock depletion.
“As mis-assessment and mis-management of a species can lead to stock depletion (Hutchings, 2000; Pauly et al., 2003)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisenone given§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
L50 values for yellowfin tuna range between 75 and 114 cm FL.
“In the case of yellowfin tuna, L50 values range between 75 and 114 cm FL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 3
Life history information such as age and growth, reproduction, maturity and mortality is required to determine population productivity and, hence, resilience to fisheries.
“Life history information such as age and growth, reproduction, maturity and mortality is required to determine population productivity and, hence, resilience to fisheries (King and McFarlane, 2003; Morgan et al., 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
Mean size at maturity estimates for bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean range from 88.1 cm FL (females) and 86.8 cm FL (males) in the eastern Indian Ocean to 102.0 cm (females) and 119.3 cm (males) FL in the western Indian Ocean.
“Mean size at maturity estimates range from 88.1 cm FL (females) and 86.8 cm FL (males) in the eastern Indian Ocean (Nootmorn, 2004) to 102.0 (females) and 119.3 (males) cm FL in the western Indian Ocean (Zhu et al. 2011; Zudaire et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nootmorn, 2004
- cites Zhu et al. 2011
- cites Zudaire et al. 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13
There are no studies addressing breeding strategy and energy allocation to reproduction for bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean.
“For bigeye tuna, there are no studies addressing the breeding strategy and energy allocation to reproduction in the Indian Ocean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 12
Female skipjack tuna follow an income breeder strategy, obtaining required energy directly from food intake rather than from accumulated energy reserves.
“In terms of reproductive strategy, female skipjack tuna follow what has been described as an income breeder strategy, that is, required energy is obtained directly from food intake rather than from accumulated energy reserves (Grande et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grande et al., 2016 source
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14
In equatorial waters of the Indian Ocean, bigeye tuna are able to spawn year round.
“In equatorial waters of the Indian Ocean, bigeye tuna are able to spawn year round (Kume et al., 1971; Stobberup et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kume et al., 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Stobberup et al., 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14
A shorter spawning period (December to February) has been reported for female yellowfin tuna smaller than 100 cm FL.
“A shorter spawning period (i.e., from December to February) has been reported for females smaller than 100 cm FL (Zudaire et al., 2013a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zudaire et al., 2013a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 16
Using nuclear microsatellite markers, there was no differentiation between skipjack tuna samples from the east coast of India and the coast of Japan.
“However, when using nuclear microsatellite markers, there was no differentiation between samples from the two aforementioned regions (Menezes et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Menezes et al., 2008 source
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14
In the western Indian Ocean, high reproductive activity of bigeye tuna has been observed from January to March.
“whereas in the western Indian Ocean, high reproductive activity has been observed from January to March (Zudaire et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zudaire et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.3. Parasites · p. 16
Parasite data from juvenile yellowfin and bigeye tuna from the Maldives proved to be significantly different from those belonging to Indonesian waters.
“More recently parasite data from juvenile yellowfin and bigeye tuna from the Maldives proved to be significantly different from those belonging to Indonesian waters (Moore et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moore et al., 2019 source
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17
Wu et al. (2010) did not detect any genetic differentiation between yellowfin tuna from the western Pacific and western Indian Oceans using mitochondrial markers.
“However, Wu et al . (2010) did not detect any genetic differentiation between yellowfin tuna from the western Pacific and western Indian Oceans using mitochondrial markers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17
Using allozyme markers, Smith et al. (1988) described genetic heterogeneity between yellowfin tuna from the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
“Using allozyme markers, Smith et al. (1988) described genetic heterogeneity between yellowfin tuna from the Pacific and Indian Oceans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al., 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14
The offshore waters of the Mozambique Channel and the eastern Indian Ocean are known as secondary spawning grounds for yellowfin tuna.
“The offshore waters of Mozambique Channel and the eastern Indian Ocean are also known as secondary spawning grounds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17
A global genetic study of yellowfin tuna combining both allozymes and mitochondrial DNA suggested differentiation between the Atlantic, Indian, west-central Pacific and east Pacific oceans.
“A global genetic study of yellowfin tuna combining both allozymes and mitochondrial DNA, suggested differentiation between the Atlantic, Indian, west-central Pacific and east Pacific oceans (Ward et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ward et al., 1997
- Premisereasoning§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14
Bigeye tuna from different areas of the Indian Ocean possess differences in spawning seasonality.
“Bigeye tuna from different areas of the Indian Ocean possess differences in spawning seasonality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17
Sequence data of the mitochondrial D-loop region revealed the presence of four clades of skipjack tuna in the east and west coasts of India.
“Additionally, sequence data of the mitochondrial D-loop region revealed the presence of four clades of skipjack tuna in the east and west coasts of India (Menezes et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Menezes et al., 2012 source
- Premisecitation§ 4. Stock structure · p. 14
The assumption of single Indian-wide stocks is based on results from the Indian Ocean Regional Tuna Tagging Program (RTTP-IO) that suggest rapid and large-scale movements of the three tropical species in the Indian Ocean.
“This assumption is based on the results obtained from the Indian Ocean Regional Tuna Tagging Program (RTTP-IO) that suggest rapid and large-scale movements of the three tropical species in the Indian Ocean (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015 source
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14
Spawning period of tropical tunas seems to shorten as the distance from the equator increases.
“Spawning period seems to shorten as the distance from equator increases (Matsumoto et al., 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Matsumoto et al., 1984
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 16
Menezes et al. (2006) found high levels of genetic differentiation between skipjack tuna collected from the east coast of India and the coast of Japan (Pacific Ocean) after using PCR-RFLP analysis of the mitochondrial D-loop region.
“For example, Menezes et al. (2006) found high levels of genetic differentiation between skipjack tuna collected from the east coast of India and the coast of Japan (Pacific Ocean) after using PCR-RFLP analysis of the mitochondrial D-loop region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Menezes et al., 2006 source
- Premisenone given§ 4. Stock structure · p. 14
There is little information available to determine whether the tropical tuna of the Indian Ocean constitute single or several stocks.
“There is little information available to determine whether the tropical tuna of the Indian Ocean constitute single or several stocks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 4.3. Parasites · p. 16
Authors have suggested that movements of yellowfin and bigeye from the Maldives archipelago into the eastern Indian Ocean were limited.
“Therefore, authors have suggested movements of yellowfin and bigeye from the Maldives archipelago into the eastern Indian Ocean were limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17
In adjacent waters of Sri Lanka, Maldives and Laccadive islands, two differentiated stocks of skipjack tuna have been described after analysing patterns of genetic variation with both a mitochondrial gene and six microsatellite loci.
“In adjacent waters of Sri Lanka, Maldives and Laccadive islands, two differentiated stocks have been described after analysing patterns of genetic variation with both a mitochondrial gene and six microsatellite loci (Dammannagoda et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dammannagoda et al., 2011 source
- Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14
In the eastern Indian Ocean, yellowfin tuna spawning is prolonged from November until April.
“In the east, spawning is prolonged from November until April (John, 1995; John et al., 1998; Nootmorn et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites John, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites John et al., 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nootmorn et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18
Global genetic studies have reported an inter-oceanic division between Atlantic and Indo-Pacific bigeye tuna both by analysing nuclear or mitochondrial markers.
“Global genetic studies have also reported an inter-oceanic division between Atlantic and Indo-Pacific bigeye tuna both by analysing nuclear (Durand et al., 2005) or mitochondrial (Alvarado-Bremer et al., 1998; Chow et al., 2000b; Martinez et al., 2006) markers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21
The evidence of fast and large movements of yellowfin tuna reported by the RTTP-IO supports the assumption of a single well-mixed yellowfin tuna population within the Indian Ocean.
“The evidence of fast and large movements of yellowfin tuna reported by the RTTP-IO supports the assumption of a single well-mixed yellowfin tuna population within the Indian Ocean (IOTC, 2017c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IOTC, 2017c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.5. Otolith microchemistry · p. 20
Otolith microchemistry analyses showed restricted movements of yellowfin and bigeye tuna of the eastern Indian Ocean during their first 4-6 months of life.
“Similarly, otolith microchemistry analyses showed restricted movements of yellowfin and bigeye tuna of the eastern Indian Ocean during their first 4-6 months of life (Proctor et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21
Bigeye released off Tanzania were subsequently recovered as far away as the subtropical Indian Ocean, eastern Indian Ocean and the southern and western coasts of South Africa.
“For instance, bigeye released off Tanzania were subsequently recovered as far away as the subtropical Indian Ocean, eastern Indian Ocean and the southern and western coasts of South Africa (Hallier and Million, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hallier and Million, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 20
Results from tagging programs describe fast and large-scale skipjack movements, with an average monthly distance of 1066 miles between tagging and recovery positions in the first year.
“Results obtained from these programs describe fast and large-scale skipjack movements, with an average monthly distance of 1066 miles between tagging and recovery positions in the first year (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015 source
- Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21
Short-term recoveries of yellowfin tuna were associated with relatively long distances (249 miles on average), about 5 times longer than the distances of short-term recoveries in other oceans.
“For instance, short-term recoveries were associated with relatively long distances (249 miles on average), about 5 times longer than the distances of short-term recoveries in other oceans (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015 source
- Premisereasoning§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23
There is, in general, a lack of information regarding life-history traits of skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna at an oceanic scale in the Indian Ocean.
“Firstly, there is, in general, a lack of information regarding life-history traits of skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna at an oceanic scale in the Indian Ocean.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 19
SNP analyses indicated a gradient in gene flow between the Indonesian archipelago, the eastern Indian Ocean, and the Maldives, consistent with an isolation by distance model.
“Similarly, SNP analyses indicated a gradient in geneflow between the Indonesian archipelago, the eastern Indian Ocean, and the Maldives, consistent with an isolation by distance model (Proctor et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.5. Otolith microchemistry · p. 20
In the Indian Ocean, initial investigations of otolith trace element data proved useful for yellowfin tuna stock delineation.
“In the Indian Ocean, initial investigations of otolith trace element data proved useful for yellowfin tuna stock delineation (ArtetxeArrate et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ArtetxeArrate et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18
Indo-Pacific bigeye tuna intermingle off southern Africa with Atlantic bigeye tuna.
“Indo-Pacific bigeye tuna intermingle off southern Africa with Atlantic bigeye tuna (Chow et al., 2000b; Durand et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chow et al., 2000b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Durand et al., 2005 source
- Interpretationnone given§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 19
In general, results relying on mitochondrial DNA showed higher heterogeneity than those based on nuclear DNA.
“In general, results relying on mitochondrial DNA showed higher heterogeneity than those based on nuclear DNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18
At intra-oceanic scale, the comparison between samples from the westernmost and easternmost parts of the Indian Ocean did not reveal any genetic differentiation in yellowfin tuna.
“At intra-oceanic scale, the comparison between samples from the westernmost and easternmost parts of the Indian Ocean, did not reveal any genetic differentiation (Chow et al., 2000a; Nishida et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chow et al., 2000a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nishida et al., 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21
Kolody and Hoyle (2013) found that tag releases from the Maldives area were sometimes retained there, without mixing into the rest of the population.
“However, Kolody and Hoyle (2013) found that tag releases from the Maldives area were sometimes retained there, without mixing into the rest of the population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kolody and Hoyle, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.5. Otolith microchemistry · p. 20
The study detected some level of separation between two potential nursery regions (Seychelles-Somalia and Mozambique Channel) using young-of-the-year yellowfin tuna from the western Indian Ocean.
“Moreover, the study detected some level of separation between two potential nursery regions (Seychelles-Somalia and Mozambique Channel) using young-of-the-year (YOY) yellowfin tuna from the western Indian Ocean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ArtetxeArrate et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21
Adam and Sibert (2002) found evidences of low emigration rates of skipjack tuna from Maldives to the rest of the Indian Ocean.
“Although the heterogeneity of skipjack movement patterns was high, Adam and Sibert (2002) found evidences of low emigration rates from Maldives to the rest of the Indian Ocean.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam and Sibert, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18
A study using the mitochondrial D-loop region supported the presence of three genetically different stocks of yellowfin tuna in the north Indian Ocean.
“Additionally, a study using the mitochondrial D-loop region supported the presence of three genetically different stocks of yellowfin tuna in the north Indian Ocean (Kunal et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kunal et al., 2013 source
- Premisenone given§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23
Different studies calculate growth models based on fish from different size/age classes, which cautions the extrapolation of the results outside the range of the data.
“Moreover, the fact that different studies calculate growth models based on fish from different size/age classes, caution the extrapolation of the results outside the range of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 19
For the three species of tropical tunas, different population structure was suggested depending on the analyses.
“For the three species of tropical tunas, different population structure was suggested depending on the analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21
There may be some degree of separation between the yellowfin tuna populations of the west and east Indian Ocean.
“Thus, there may be some degree of separation between the yellowfin tuna populations of the west and east Indian Ocean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 22
Movement dynamics within the eastern Indian Ocean have not yet been adequately evaluated.
“Therefore, movement dynamics within the eastern Indian 620 Ocean have not yet been adequately evaluated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 24
The combination of different approaches has proved to be a powerful and reliable way to clarify unresolved questions related to stock structure.
“the combination of different approaches has proved to be a powerful and reliable way to clarify unresolved questions related to stock structure (Welch et al., 2015; Pita et al., 2016; Izzo et al., 2017; Proctor et al., 2019)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- Rests on an assumption: Each method provides information about stock structure at different spatial and/or temporal scales.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
- May combine two claims. 36
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisecitation§ Abstract : · p. 1Understanding life history strategies and stock structure is essential to determine species resilience and how they might respond to exploitation.
“Understanding life history strategies and stock structure is essential to determine species resilience and how they might respond to exploitation.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · p. 3 · plain
“Understanding life history strategies and stock structure is essential in determining how a species might respond to fishing pressure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Jennings et al., 1998 source
- cites Begg et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Juan-Jordá et al., 2013 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says life history strategies are fundamental to understanding how species respond to human exploitation, and the Discussion (page unavailable) applies them to management of exploited scombrids. The passages do not establish that understanding stock structure is essential for determining resilience or responses to exploitation. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · p. 3 · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 12Tropical tunas are oviparous, have asynchronous oocyte development, and spawn multiple batches of oocytes each spawning season.
“Tropical tunas are oviparous, have an asynchronous oocyte development and spawn multiple batches of oocytes each spawning season (Joseph, 1963; Hunter et al., 1986; Stéquert and Ramcharrun, 1995; Schaefer, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Joseph, 1963
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hunter et al., 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Stéquert and Ramcharrun, 1995 source
In “Structure de la gonade” (page unavailable), the paper describes skipjack ovaries containing oocytes at different developmental stages. In “Fréquence de ponte des individus” (page unavailable), it infers repeated egg releases during a spawning period, but presents that inference cautiously. The findings concern western Indian Ocean skipjack, not tropical tunas generally, and the paper does not explicitly classify them as oviparous. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14Koya et al. (2012) observed year-round spawning of skipjack tuna in Indian waters but reported a peak in activity between December-March and a smaller peak from June to August.
“Koya et al., (2012) also observed year-round spawning in Indian waters but reported a peak in activity between December-March and a smaller peak from June to August.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Koya et al., 2012
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 17Genomic analyses have revealed asymmetrical dispersal from the Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna into the Atlantic and highlighted that yellowfin tuna found along all the South African coast are derived from the Indian population.
“Moreover, genomic analyses have revealed asymmetrical dispersal from the Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna into the Atlantic and highlighted that yellowfin tuna found along all the South African coast are derived from the Indian population (Barth et al., 2017; Mullins et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Barth et al., 2017 source
The Discussion section, “Demographic Histories and Asymmetric Gene Flow,” reports migration estimates about ten times higher from the Indo-Pacific to the Atlantic than in the reverse direction. But the Sample Collection section lists only one South African site, Cape Town, and the Results section says all except one of its seven specimens grouped with the Indo-Pacific clade. The paper therefore does not establish that yellowfin tuna along all of South Africa’s coast derive from the Indian population. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mullins et al., 2018 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18Microsatellite loci supported a single worldwide panmictic bigeye tuna population, whereas mitochondrial markers show genetic differentiation between Atlantic and Indo-Pacific bigeye tuna populations.
“Microsatellite loci supported a single worldwide panmictic bigeye tuna population, whereas mitochondrial markers show genetic differentiation between Atlantic and Indo-Pacific bigeye tuna populations, as previous studies did.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gonzalez et al., 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 24Skipjack tuna has undergone distribution range reduction in the Indian Ocean, contrary to what occurred in the Pacific Ocean.
“Worm and Tittensor (2011) reported that skipjack tuna has undergone distribution range reduction in the Indian Ocean, contrary to what occurred in the Pacific Ocean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Worm and Tittensor (2011) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Abstract : · p. 1High fishing pressure over the past three decades has raised concerns about the sustainability of skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean.
“High fishing pressure over the past three decades has raised concerns about their sustainability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13Mean batch fecundity of bigeye tuna in the western Indian Ocean is estimated at 0.75±0.52 million oocytes.
“Finally, mean batch fecundity of bigeye tuna in the western Indian Ocean has been estimated at 0.75±0.52 million oocytes (Zudaire et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zudaire et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 3The difficulty of monitoring the fisheries within the Indian Ocean not only affects the stock assessment process, but also the implementation of the agreed management measures in the IOTC area.
“The difficulty of monitoring the fisheries within the Indian Ocean not only affects the stock assessment process, but also the implementation of the agreed management measures in the IOTC area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract : · p. 1Regional stock structure studies indicate that the panmictic population assumption of these stocks should be investigated further.
“regional stock structure studies indicate that the panmictic population assumption of these stocks should be investigated further.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 4Spatial structure is recognized in current stock assessments, which need to determine relative abundances among regions.
“although spatial structure is recognized in current stock assessments, which need to determine relative abundances among regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hoyle, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hoyle and Langley, 2020 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 3Understanding of stock structure helps determine the appropriate units for stock assessment and suitable spatial scale for management.
“the understanding of stock structure helps determine the appropriate units for stock assessment and suitable spatial scale for management (Kerr et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kerr et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13In the eastern and west-central Indian Ocean, L50 for female yellowfin tuna has been estimated at 109.6 cm and 114.0 cm respectively, and for males at 104.9 cm and 120.0 cm FL.
“In the eastern and west-central Indian Ocean, L50 for females has been estimated at 109.6 cm and 114.0 cm respectively, whereas L50 reported for males was at 104.9 cm and 120.0 cm FL (Nootmorn et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Nootmorn et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhu et al., 2008 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13Tropical tuna show an indeterminate fecundity type, with oocyte maturation continuous during extended spawning periods.
“Tropical tuna show an indeterminate fecundity type (i.e., oocyte maturation is continuous during their extended spawning periods) (Grande et al., 2012; Zudaire et al., 2013b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Grande et al., 2012 source
- cites Zudaire et al., 2013b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 4Since 2008, Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna assessments used a spatial stratification, and so did recent bigeye assessments.
“Since 2008, Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna assessments used a spatial stratification (Langley et al., 2008; Fu et al., 2018), and so did recent bigeye assessments (Langley, 2016; Fu, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Langley et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fu et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Langley, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 4Each tropical tuna species is considered to form a single stock in the Indian Ocean for management purposes.
“Each tropical tuna species is considered to form a single stock in the Indian Ocean for management purposes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites IOTC, 2017a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites IOTC, 2017b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites IOTC, 2017c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Introduction · p. 3Although catch limitations of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean were agreed due to the overfished status of the stock, the measure failed to achieve its goal as catches has increased by around 9% in 2018 from 2014/2015 levels despite limitations.
“although catch limitations of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean were agreed due to the overfished status of the stock (IOTC Resolution 19/01), the measure failed to achieve its goal as catches has increased by around 9% in 2018 from 2014/2015 levels despite limitations (IOTC, 2019b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IOTC, 2019b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14In the western Indian Ocean, spawning of skipjack tuna occurs throughout the year, with peaks of intensity between November-March and June-July, coinciding with the northeastern and southwestern monsoon periods respectively.
“In the western Indian Ocean, spawning of skipjack tuna occurs throughout the year, with peaks of intensity between November-March and June-July, coinciding with the northeastern and southwestern monsoon period respectively (Stéquert et al., 2001; Grande et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13Sardenne et al. (2017) suggested an income-capital breeding strategy for bigeye tuna after concluding that liver neutral fatty acids levels were similar to those from yellowfin.
“However, Sardenne et al., 2017 suggested an income-capital breeding strategy for bigeye tuna after concluding that liver neutral fatty acids levels were similar to those from yellowfin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sardenne et al., 2017 source
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 4These models consider spatial differences in catches but assume a single-stock recruitment relationship (i.e. a unique spawning population with no reproductively isolated units).
“These models consider spatial differences in catches but assume a single-stock recruitment relationship (i.e. a unique spawning population with no reproductively isolated units).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 13Grande et al. (2010) estimated batch fecundity from 100,828 to 627,325 oocytes in female skipjack ranging from 32 to 68 cm FL.
“Grande et al. (2010) estimated batch fecundity from 100,828 oocytes to 627,325 oocytes in female skipjack ranging from 32 to 68 cm FL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grande et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Introduction · p. 4Scientific evidence on how tropical tuna are structured in the Indian Ocean is required to validate the adequacy of the divisions used in this approach and to resolve the single stock hypothesis assumption, as different scenarios may lead to different management strategies and implications.
“However, scientific evidence on how tropical tuna are structured in the Indian Ocean is required to validate the adequacy of the divisions used in this approach and to resolve the single stock hypothesis assumption, as different scenarios may lead to different management strategies and implications”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14In the Pacific Ocean, mean spawning interval has been determined as 1.18, 1.53 and 1.09 days for skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna respectively.
“in the Pacific Ocean the mean spawning interval has been determined as 1.18 , 1.53 and 1.09 days for skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna respectively (Schaefer, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schaefer, 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18Proctor et al. (2019) proposed that the observed pattern of differentiation may indicate limited gene flow between the central and eastern Indian Ocean, with more pronounced gene flow among Indonesian and Western Pacific regions.
“Proctor et al. (2019) proposed that the observed pattern of differentiation may indicate limited gene flow between the central and eastern Indian Ocean, with more pronounced gene flow among Indonesian and Western Pacific regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14In the eastern Indian Ocean, the spawning season of bigeye tuna is reported from December to January, with another peak in June.
“In the eastern Indian Ocean, the spawning season is reported from December to January, with another peak in June (Nootmorn, 2004), whereas in the western Indian Ocean, high reproductive activity has been observed from January to March (Zudaire et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nootmorn, 2004
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4. Stock structure · p. 14Current stock assessments are conducted assuming that there are single, Indian-wide stocks of skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye tuna, and that there is no exchange of fish among Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans.
“Current stock assessments are conducted assuming that there are single, Indianwide stocks of skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye tuna; and that there is no exchange of fish among Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1. Fisheries Data · p. 15Morita and Koto (1970) suggested a two-stock structure for Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna, with western and eastern stocks separated approximately at 100°E and possibly mixing in adjacent waters.
“Similarly, analysing Japanese longline fishery data (1961-1965), Morita and Koto, (1970) suggested a twostock structure for the Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna; the western and eastern stocks separated approximately at 100°E and possibly mixing in adjacent waters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Morita and Koto, 1970
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18Results from genome wide SNPs indicate a marked genetic difference between yellowfin tuna samples from the central Indian Ocean (Maldives) and the western Pacific Ocean, but not between samples from eastern Indian Ocean (Indonesia) and the western Pacific Ocean.
“Results from genome wide SNPs also indicate a marked genetic difference between samples from the central Indian Ocean (Maldives) and the western Pacific Ocean, but not between samples from eastern Indian Ocean (Indonesia) and the western Pacific Ocean (Proctor et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14Yellowfin tuna predominantly spawn from November to February in equatorial waters, primarily on spawning grounds west of 75°E.
“Yellowfin tuna predominantly spawn from November to February in equatorial waters, primarily on spawning grounds west of 75°E (Shung, 1973; Hassani and Stéquert, 1991; Zudaire et al., 2013a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Shung, 1973
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hassani and Stéquert, 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zudaire et al., 2013a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1. Fisheries Data · p. 15Nishida (1992) concluded that there were two major and two minor stocks of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean, using CPUE, age-specific CPUE and size variations from longline fishery data.
“Later, Nishida (1992) concluded that there were two major and two minor stocks of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean, using catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE), agespecific CPUE and size variations obtained from longline fishery data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nishida, 1992 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.4. Reproductive biology · p. 14Secondary spawning peaks for yellowfin tuna have been described in June for the western Indian Ocean, between April and June around Sri Lanka, and from October to December off northern Australia and Madagascar.
“Secondary spawning peaks have also been described; in June for the western Indian Ocean, between April and June around Sri Lanka, and from October to December off northern Australia and Madagascar (Stéquert and Marsac, 1989; Stéquert et al., 2001; Zudaire et al., 2013a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Stéquert and Marsac, 1989
- cites Stéquert et al., 2001 source
- cites Zudaire et al., 2013a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1. Fisheries Data · p. 15For bigeye tuna, a single stock was suggested for the Indian Ocean based on distribution, size composition and sexual maturity, although some differences between eastern and western bigeye tuna were reported.
“In the case of the bigeye tuna, a single stock was suggested for the Indian Ocean, based on the distribution, size composition and sexual maturity of the fish, although some differences between eastern and western bigeye tuna were reported (Kume et al., 1971).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kume et al., 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1. Fisheries Data · p. 15The two major yellowfin tuna stocks were defined at 40°-80°E and 80°-120°E, and the two minor stocks were defined westward 40°E and eastward of 120°E, named far western and far eastern respectively, with the latter possibly being part of the Pacific stock.
“The two major stocks (named western and eastern) were defined at 40°-80°E and 80°-120°E respectively. The two minor stocks were defined westward 40°E and eastward of 120°E, and named far western and far eastern respectively, with the latter possibly being part of the Pacific stock.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nishida, 1992 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 22This may lead to biased results and data misinterpretation.
“This may lead to biased 615 results and data misinterpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23There is still not a consensus on spawning time and location of tropical tuna in the Indian Ocean, which is important to inform assumptions about total reproductive output.
“Similarly, there is still not a consensus on spawning time and location of tropical tuna in the Indian Ocean, which is important to inform assumptions about total reproductive output.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 20Despite rapid movements described for skipjack tuna tagged in the Mozambique Channel, most tagged tuna returned to this area within one year, coinciding with the March-May fishing season, a pattern recurrent over the studied years.
“Despite the rapid movements described for skipjack tuna tagged in the Mozambique Channel, most tagged tuna returned to this area within one year, coinciding with the March-May fishing season, a pattern that was recurrent over the studied years (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21Results obtained from the RTTP-IO describe fast and large-scale bigeye movements, with an average monthly distance between tagging and recovery positions of 918 miles in the first year, with distances increasing slowly in subsequent years.
“Results obtained from the RTTP-IO also describe fast and large-scale bigeye movements. The average monthly distance between tagging and recovery positions is 918 miles in the first year, with distances increasing slowly in subsequent years (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23Despite strong evidence of sexual-dimorphism in yellowfin and bigeye tuna growth, which can lead to elevated sex-biased fishing mortality rates, this is not currently being considered in stock assessments due to a lack of the necessary data.
“Despite strong evidence of sexual-dimorphism in yellowfin and bigeye tuna growth (Eveson et al., 2015), which can lead to elevated sex-biased fishing mortality rates, this is not currently being considered in stock assessments due to a lack of the necessary data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eveson et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 19Overall, results obtained from the application of a single type of molecular marker should be interpreted with caution.
“Overall, it seems that results obtained from the application of a single type of molecular marker should be interpreted with caution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23Most studies are regionally limited, which impedes a global overview of the complex interaction between the environment and these species and makes it difficult to incorporate life-history parameters at the appropriate scale into stock assessment models.
“Most studies are regionally limited, which impedes a global overview of the complex interaction between the environment and these species and makes it difficult to incorporate life-history parameters at the appropriate scale into stock assessment models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 22Very few tags have been returned from the eastern Indian Ocean, which may reflect a lack movement from west to east, but more certainly, this is a consequence of poor reporting rates by longliners operating in the east Indian Ocean.
“For instance 617 very few tags have been returned from the eastern Indian Ocean (Murua et al., 2015), which may reflect a 618 lack movement from west to east, but more certainly, this is a consequence of poor reporting rates by 619 longliners operating in the east Indian Ocean.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murua et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 22Fonteneau and Hallier (2015) advised that current tagging programs targeting tropical tuna may still not be adequate to estimate the potential stock mixing rates.
“Fonteneau and Hallier (2015) advised that current tagging programs 616 targeting tropical tuna, may still not be adequate to estimate the potential stock mixing rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23There are discrepancies regarding the growth and reproduction parameters of skipjack, yellowfin and bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean, which increases uncertainties in assessments of their status and advice for their management.
“However, there are discrepancies regarding the growth and reproduction parameters of these key species in the Indian Ocean, which increases uncertainties in assessments of their status and advice for their management.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 22Electronic tags may present a complementary platform to elucidate tropical tuna real movements.
“Electronic tags may present a complementary platform to 621 elucidate tropical tuna real movements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 22Conventional tagging studies depend on tag-recapture efforts, and can be sensitive to the distribution of releases and assumptions related to the tagged population (e.g. random selection, independence and complete mixing).
“Conventional tagging studies, however, depend on tag-recapture efforts, and can be sensitive to the 613 distribution of releases and assumptions related to the tagged population (e.g. random selection, 614 independence and complete mixing) (Pollock and Pine, 2007; Berger et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pollock and Pine, 2007 source
- cites Berger et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 20Skipjack tagged in Tanzania showed the larger and fastest migrations (average distances of 1129 miles after one month at liberty), followed by skipjack tagged in Mozambique Channel (an average of 894 miles travelled).
“Skipjack tagged in Tanzania showed the larger and fastest migrations (e.g. average distances of 1129 miles after one month at liberty), followed by skipjack tagged in Mozambique Channel (an average of 894 miles travelled).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21Langley and Million (2012) suggested that the 28-29oC SST isotherm may limit the eastward dispersal of the tagged fish.
“Langley and Million (2012) suggested that the 28-29ºC SST isotherm may limit the eastward dispersal of the tagged fish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Langley and Million, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23Skipjack tuna have fast growth rates and reach sexual maturity the fastest among three tropical tuna species.
“For example, skipjack tuna have fast growth rates and reach sexual maturity the fastest among three tropical tuna species (Murua et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murua et al., 2017 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18A recent study using SNP data proved restricted connectivity between Indian Ocean (central and eastern) and the western Pacific Ocean bigeye tuna, with samples from central Indonesia having limited connectivity also with the previous areas.
“However, a recent study using SNP data proved restricted connectivity between Indian Ocean (central and eastern) and the western Pacific Ocean bigeye tuna, with samples from central Indonesia having limited connectivity also with the previous areas (Proctor et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.6. Tagging · p. 21The reported fast and extensive movements of bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean led to the assumption that its population is highly mobile, supporting the current assumption of a single stock for the Indian Ocean.
“The reported fast and extensive movements of bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean led to the assumption that its population is highly 611 mobile, supporting the current assumption of a single stock for the Indian Ocean (IOTC, 2017a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IOTC, 2017a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 23Growth, mortality and reproduction are determinant factors for population productivity and key variables for stock assessment and management advice.
“Growth, mortality and reproduction are determinant factors for population productivity and, thus, key variables for stock assessment and management advice (Maunder et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maunder et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 4.4. Genetics · p. 18Most studies carried out to describe the structure of bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean did not observe signs of heterogeneity, supporting the existence of a single panmictic population in this ocean.
“Few studies have been carried out to describe the structure of bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean. Most of them did not observe signs of heterogeneity, supporting the existence of a single panmictic population in this ocean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 24A holistic study that integrates results gained from several methods including different spatial and temporal scales will be beneficial in defining appropriate units for the management of tropical tuna species in the Indian Ocean.
“Thus, a holistic study that integrates results gained from several methods including different spatial and temporal scales, will be beneficial in defining appropriate units for the management of tropical tuna species in the Indian Ocean.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Conclusions and future research directions · p. 24Natural markers can contribute valuable insights of population structuring and highlight migration behaviours or population dynamics that might be sufficiently independent to guarantee spatially structured management.
“Therefore, they can contribute valuable insights of population structuring and highlight migration behaviours or population dynamics that might be sufficiently independent to guarantee spatially structured management.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Natural markers such as parasite tags or otolith microchemistry can inform about the degree of connectivity over an ecological time scale (individual life span).
- Rests on an assumption: Natural markers can provide information on the environmental history experienced by individuals throughout different life stages.
The paper relies on this without support.
Current assumptions of single stocks for yellowfin, skipjack and bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean are based on the latest result of tag-recoveries from the RTTP-IO.
“the current assumptions of single stocks for yellowfin, skipjack and bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean, are based on the latest result of tag-recoveries from the RTTP-IO”
The paper relies on this without support.
RTTP-IO tag-recoveries provide evidence of rapid and large-scale movements for yellowfin, skipjack and bigeye tuna.
“which provide evidence of rapid and large-scale movements for these tuna species”
The paper relies on this without support.
Tagging events do not represent the whole Indian Ocean.
“However, tagging events do not represent the whole Indian Ocean.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Distances between tag release and recovery positions do not provide a full picture of the real movements of tagged tunas.
“Moreover, the distances between tag release and recovery positions do not provide a full picture of the real movements of tagged tunas”
The paper relies on this without support.
Electronic tagging can more effectively track the real movements of tagged tunas than tag release-recovery distances.
“which can, more effectively, be tracked by electronic tagging.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Natural markers such as parasite tags or otolith microchemistry can inform about the degree of connectivity over an ecological time scale (individual life span).
“Natural markers, such as parasite tags or otolith microchemistry, can inform about the degree of connectivity over an ecological time scale (i.e. individual life span)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Natural markers can provide information on the environmental history experienced by individuals throughout different life stages.
“and hence provide information on the environmental history experienced by individuals throughout different life stages.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Each method provides information about stock structure at different spatial and/or temporal scales.
“As each method provides information about stock structure at different spatial and/or temporal scales”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tuna larvae have a very narrow diet and are highly selective in consuming limited species of zooplankton in the shallow mixed layer.
“They have a very narrow diet and are highly selective in their consumption of limited species of zooplankton inhabiting the shallow mixed layer (such as appendicularians, cladocerans, and cyclopoid copepods in the genera Farranula and Corycaeus) (Llopiz and Hobday, 2015; Artetxe-Arrate et al., 2021).”
From Impacts of phytoplankton availability on bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) recruitment in the Indian Ocean (2024) · cites this paper as Artetxe-Arrate et al., 2021
Section 3.2, p. 9 states that larvae and small juveniles eat planktonic organisms in the shallow mixed layer. It does not say that larvae have a very narrow diet, are highly selective, or consume only a limited set of zooplankton species; it does not name the taxa in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
2005 is placed at the beginning of the 20th century
MinorThe passage describes record catches as occurring at the beginning of the 20th century but dates them to 2005, which is in the 21st century.
“At the beginning of the 20 th”
“with 1,204,041 t reported in 2005.”
Bigeye table row cites the skipjack reference
MinorTable 1 attributes a bigeye spawning-season entry to IOTC 2017b, but the reference list identifies IOTC 2017b as skipjack tuna supporting information.
“| BET | Indian Ocean | 1: December to January | (IOTC 2017b) |”
“IOTC (2017b). Skipjack Tuna Supporting Information.”
October is included in the southwest monsoon
MinorThe fisheries description calls July-October the southwest monsoon, whereas the paper defines that monsoon as June-September and October-November as an inter-monsoon period.
“During the southwest monsoon (July152 - October, Fig.4e and f)”
“the southwest monsoon (June-September) and the northeast monsoon (December-March), with two inter-monsoon periods in between, one from April to May and the second from October to November”
Yellowfin table row cites the bigeye reference
MinorTable 1 attributes a yellowfin spawning-season entry to IOTC 2017a, but the reference list identifies IOTC 2017a as bigeye tuna supporting information.
“| YFT | Equatorial Area (0-10ºS) | December to March | (IOTC 2017a) |”
“IOTC (2017a). Bigeye Tuna Supporting Information.”
Cites
A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean
Saji, N. H., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P. N., & Yamagata, T. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43854 · Cited by 5,510 · see citing works
Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths:pathways, mechanisms and applications
Campana, S. E. (1999) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps188263 · Cited by 2,171 · see citing works
The monsoon circulation of the Indian Ocean
Schott, F. A., & McCreary, J. P. (2001) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/s0079-6611(01)00083-0 · Cited by 1,798 · see citing works
Indian Ocean circulation and climate variability
Schott, F. A., Xie, S., & McCreary, J. P. (2009) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2007rg000245 · Cited by 1,594 · see citing works
Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines
Heithaus, M. R., Frid, A., Wirsing, A. J., & Worm, B. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.003 · Cited by 1,350 · see citing works
Pauly, D. F., & Zeller, D. C. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10244 · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing
Agnew, D. J., Pearce, J., Pramod, G., Peatman, T., Watson, R., Beddington, J. R., & Pitcher, T. J. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004570 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Global gridded data set of the oxygen isotopic composition in seawater
LeGrande, A. N., & Schmidt, G. A. (2006) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2006gl026011 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Collapse and recovery of marine fishes
Hutchings, J. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35022565 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Electronic tagging and population structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna
Block, B. A., Teo, S. L. H., Walli, A., Boustany, A., Stokesbury, M. J. W., Farwell, C. J., Weng, K. C., Dewar, H., & Williams, T. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03463 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
An holistic approach to fish stock identification
Begg, G. A., & Waldman, J. R. (1999) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-7836(99)00065-x · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview
Begg, G. A., Friedland, K. D., & Pearce, J. B. (1999) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-7836(99)00062-4 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Pauly, D., Alder, J., Bennett, E., Christensen, V., Tyedmers, P., & Watson, R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088667 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Life history correlates of responses to fisheries exploitation
Jennings, S., Reynolds, J. D., & Mills, S. C. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0300 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Stock identification methods : applications in fishery science
Cadrin, S. X., Friedland, K. D., & Waldman, J. R. (2005) · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Marine fish life history strategies: applications to fishery management
King, J. R., & McFarlane, G. A. (2003) · Fisheries Management and Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00359.x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Failing the high seas: A global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations
Cullis-Suzuki, S., & Pauly, D. F. (2010) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.002 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Megafaunal Impacts on Structure and Function of Ocean Ecosystems
Estes, J. A., Heithaus, M. R., McCauley, D. J., Rasher, D. B., & Worm, B. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085622 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Indian Ocean Decadal Variability: A Review
Han, W., Vialard, J., McPhaden, M. J., Lee, T., Masumoto, Y., Feng, M., & de Ruijter, W. P. M. (2014) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-13-00028.1 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Carey, F. G., Teal, J. M., KANWISHER, J. W., et al. (1971) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/11.1.137 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Schaefer, K. M. (2001) · Fish Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1546-5098(01)19007-2 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Tuna : physiology, ecology, and evolution
Block, B. A., & Stevens, E. D. (2001) · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Kerr, L. A., Hintzen, N. T., Cadrin, S. X., Clausen, L. W., Dickey-Collas, M., Goethel, D. R., Hatfield, E. M. C., Kritzer, J. P., & Nash, R. D. M. (2017) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw188 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
A rapid ontogenetic shift in the diet of juvenile yellowfin tuna from Hawaii
Graham, B. S., Grubbs, R. D., Holland, K. N., & Popp, B. N. (2006) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0360-y · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Three pillars of sustainability in fisheries
Asche, F., Garlock, T., Anderson, J. L., Bush, S. R., Smith, M. D., Anderson, C. M., Chu, J., Garrett, K. A., Lem, A., Lorenzen, K., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1807677115 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Stephenson, R. L. (1999) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-7836(99)00076-4 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species
Hallier, J.-P., & Gaertner, D. (2008) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps07180 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Risks of ignoring fish population spatial structure in fisheries management
Ying, Y., Chen, Y., Lin, L., et al. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f2011-116 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Potier, M., Marsac, F., Cherel, Y., Lucas, V., Sabatié, R., Olivier, M., & Ménard, F. (2006) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2006.08.020 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationWiggert, J. D., Murtugudde, R. G., & Christian, J. R. (2006) · Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.01.027 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna
Arrizabalaga, H., Dufour, F., Kell, L., Merino, G., Ibaibarriaga, L., Chust, G., Irigoien, X., Santiago, J., Murua, H., Fraile, I., et al. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.07.001 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
The Physiological Ecology of Tunas
Cameron, J. N., Sharp, G. D., & Dizon, A. E. (1979) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1443248 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
The design and analysis of field studies to estimate catch‐and‐release mortality
POLLOCK, K. H., & PINE, W. E. (2007) · Fisheries Management and Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2007.00532.x · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Identifying migrations in marine fishes through stable‐isotope analysis
Trueman, C. N., MacKenzie, K. M., & Palmer, M. R. (2012) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03361.x · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Range contraction in large pelagic predators
Worm, B., & Tittensor, D. P. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102353108 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Tuna metabolism and energetics
Korsmeyer, K. E., & Dewar, H. (2001) · Fish physiology · doi:10.1016/s1546-5098(01)19003-5 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Graham, J. B., & Dickson, K. A. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01267 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
(1986) · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Young, J., & Davis, T. (1990) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps061017 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Ely, B., Viñas, J., Bremer, J. A. A., Black, D. R., Lucas, L., Covello, K., Labrie, A. V., & Thelen, E. (2005) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-5-19 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Systematics of the tunas and mackerels (Scombridae)
Collette, B. B., Reeb, C., & Block, B. A. (2001) · Fish Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1546-5098(01)19002-3 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Ménard, F., Lorrain, A., Potier, M., & Marsac, F. (2007) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-007-0789-7 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationOtolith chemistry in stock delineation: A brief overview, current challenges and future prospects
Tanner, S. E., Reis‐Santos, P., & Cabral, H. N. (2015) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.07.019 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Graves, J., Ferris, S., & Dizon, A. (1984) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00393264 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Grewe, P., Feutry, P., Hill, P. L., Gunasekera, R., Schaefer, K., Itano, D., Fuller, D., Foster, S., & Davies, C. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16916 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationOpportunistic predation in tuna: a size-based approach
Ménard, F., Labrune, C., Shin, Y., et al. (2006) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps323223 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Otolith Elemental Composition as a Natural Marker of Fish Stocks
Campana, S. E. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012154351-8/50013-7 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Ménard, F., Marsac, F., Bellier, E., & Cazelles, B. (2006) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2006.00415.x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial management of Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries: potential and perspectives
Kaplan, D. M., Chassot, E., Amandé, J. M., Dueri, S., Demarcq, H., Dagorn, L., & Fonteneau, A. (2014) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fst233 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Durand, J.-D., Collet, A., Chow, S., Guinand, B., & Borsa, P. (2005) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-005-1564-2 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Genetic evidence for inter-oceanic subdivision of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) populations
Alvarado Bremer, J. R., Stequert, B., Robertson, N. W., & Ely, B. (1998) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s002270050420 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Dickson, K. A. (1995) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/bf00002352 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Effects of biological, economic and management factors on tuna and billfish stock status
Pons, M., Branch, T. A., Melnychuk, M. C., Jensen, O. P., Brodziak, J., Fromentin, J., Harley, S. J., Haynie, A. C., Kell, L. T., Maunder, M. N., et al. (2016) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12163 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Reglero, P., Tittensor, D., Álvarez-Berastegui, D., Aparicio-González, A., & Worm, B. (2014) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10666 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Biogeography of tuna and billfish communities
Reygondeau, G., Maury, O., Beaugrand, G., Fromentin, J. M., Fonteneau, A., & Cury, P. (2012) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02582.x · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Juan‐Jordá, M. J., Murua, H., Arrizabalaga, H., Dulvy, N. K., & Restrepo, V. R. (2017) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12256 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationvan der Elst, R., Everett, B. I., Jiddawi, N. S., Mwatha, G., Afonso, P. S., & Boulle, D. P. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2004.1492 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Duffy, L. M., Kuhnert, P., Pethybridge, H., Young, J. W., Olson, R. J., Logan, J. M., Goñi, N., Romanov, E. V., Allain, V., Staudinger, M. D., et al. (2017) · Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.03.003 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, habitat based on temperature and oxygen requirements
Barkley, R. A. (1978) · Fishery Bulletin · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Ward, R., Elliott, N. G., Innes, B. H., Smolenski, A., & Grewe, P. (1997) · Oceanographic Literature Review · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(97)88982-x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Jaquemet, S., Potier, M., & Ménard, F. (2010) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2010.11.011 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Temple, A. J., Kiszka, J. J., Stead, S. M., et al. (2017) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-017-9494-x · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Chow, S., Okamoto, H., Miyabe, N., Hiramatsu, K., & Barut, N. C. (2000) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00851.x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Murua, H., Rodriguez-Marin, E., Neilson, J. D., Farley, J. H., & Juan-Jordá, M. J. (2017) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-017-9474-1 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationThe fishery performance indicators for global tuna fisheries
McCluney, J. K., Anderson, C. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09466-6 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Genetic diversity and historical demography of Atlantic bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)
Martínez, P., González, E., Castilho, R., & Zardoya, R. (2005) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.022 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Schaefer, K. M., Fuller, D. W., & Block, B. A. (2009) · Reviews: methods and technologies in fish biology and fisheries · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9640-2_8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Catalano, S. R., Whittington, I. D., Donnellan, S. C., & Gillanders, B. M. (2013) · International Journal for Parasitology Parasites and Wildlife · doi:10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.11.001 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
(1997) · Oceanographic literature review · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationPecoraro, C., Babbucci, M., Franch, R., Rico, C., Papetti, C., Chassot, E., Bodin, N., Cariani, A., Bargelloni, L., & Tinti, F. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32331-3 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Wexler, J. B., Margulies, D., & Scholey, V. P. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2011.05.002 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Climate Change Impacts on Fisheries and Aquaculture
Phillips, B. F., & Pérez-Ramírez, M. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119154051 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries: an ecological trap?
Marsac, F., Fonteneau, A., & Ménard, F. (2000) · Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationEvans, K., Langley, A. D., Clear, N., et al. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f08-148 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Physiological Ecology of Tunas
(1978) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-639180-0.x5001-0 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Farley, J. H., Clear, N., Leroy, B. M., Davis, T. L. O., & McPherson, G. (2006) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf05255 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationSynopsis of Biological Data on Skipjack Tuna, Katsuwonus Pelamis
Matsumoto, W. M., Skillman, R. A., & Dizon, A. E. (2013) · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Pecoraro, C., Zudaire, I., Bodin, N., Murua, H., Taconet, P., Díaz‐Jáimes, P., Cariani, A., Tinti, F., & Chassot, E. (2016) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-016-9460-z · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep diving behavior observed in yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares)
Dagorn, L., Holland, K. N., Hallier, J.-P., Taquet, M., Moreno, G., Sancho, G., Itano, D., Aumeeruddy, R., Girard, C., Million, J. M. F., et al. (2006) · Aquatic Living Resources · doi:10.1051/alr:2006008 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Determining natal origin for improved management of Atlantic bluefin tuna
Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N., Díaz-Arce, N., Walter, J., Richardson, D. E., Rooker, J., Nøttestad, L., Hanke, A. R., Franks, J., Deguara, S., Lauretta, M., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2090 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationBioenergetics, Trophic Ecology, and Niche Separation of Tunas
(2016) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.amb.2016.06.002 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Global patterns in marine predatory fish
van Denderen, P. D., Lindegren, M., MacKenzie, B. R., Watson, R. A., & Andersen, K. H. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0388-z · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Conceptual and practical advances in fish stock delineation
Pita, A., Casey, J., Hawkins, S. J., Villarreal, M. R., Gutiérrez, M.-J., Cabral, H., Carocci, F., Abaunza, P., Pascual, S., & Presa, P. (2016) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.10.029 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Life in 3-D: life history strategies in tunas, mackerels and bonitos
Juan-Jordá, M. J., Mosqueira, I., Freire, J., & Dulvy, N. K. (2013) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-012-9284-4 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Genetic structuring and migration patterns of Atlantic bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus (Lowe, 1839)
Gonzalez, E. G., Beerli, P., & Zardoya, R. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-252 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
ROGER, C. (1994) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.1994.tb00055.x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Potier, M., Marsac, F., Lucas, V., Sabatié, R., Hallier, J.-P., & Ménard, F. (2004) · Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.4314/wiojms.v3i1.28447 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationRAD-seq derived genome-wide nuclear markers resolve the phylogeny of tunas
Díaz‐Arce, N., Arrizabalaga, H., Murua, H., et al. (2016) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.06.002 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationBarth, J. M. I., Damerau, M., Matschiner, M., Jentoft, S., & Hanel, R. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evx067 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Kaji, T., Tanaka, M., Oka, M., et al. (1999) · Fisheries Science · doi:10.2331/fishsci.65.700 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Sardenne, F., Bodin, N., Chassot, E., Amiel, A., Fouché, E., Degroote, M., Hollanda, S. J., Pethybridge, H., Lebreton, B., Guillou, G., et al. (2016) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2016.06.001 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Fonteneau, A., & Hallier, J.-P. (2015) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.03.022 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Management effectiveness of large pelagic fisheries in the high seas
Pons, M., Melnychuk, M. C., & Hilborn, R. W. (2017) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12253 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Growth: Theory, estimation, and application in fishery stock assessment models
Maunder, M. N., Crone, P. R., Punt, A. E., Valero, J. L., & Semmens, B. X. (2016) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2016.03.005 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Reproductive potential of Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the western Indian Ocean
Zudaire, I., Murua, H., Grande, M., et al. (2013) · Fishery Bulletin · doi:10.7755/fb.111.3.4 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationNatal origin and population connectivity of bigeye and yellowfin tuna in the Pacific Ocean
Rooker, J. R., Wells, R. J. D., Itano, D., Thorrold, S. R., & Lee, J. M. (2016) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/fog.12154 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Kunal, S. P., Kumar, G., Menezes, M. R., & Meena, R. M. (2013) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-013-0445-3 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Druon, J.-N., Chassot, E., Murua, H., & Lopez, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00315 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationZudaire, I., Murua, H., Grande, M., Pernet, F., & Bodin, N. (2014) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2013.12.010 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationMorgan, M. J., Murua, H., Kraus, G., Lambert, Y., Marteinsdóttir, G., Marshall, C. T., O’Brien, L., & Tomkiewicz, J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f09-009 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationOtolith δ18O of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis as an indicator of ambient water temperature
Kitagawa, T., Ishimura, T., Uozato, R., Shirai, K., Amano, Y., Shinoda, A., Otake, T., Tsunogai, U., & Kimura, S. (2012) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10202 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
(2000) · Time to knit · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(97)84975-7 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Food consumption of yellowfin tuna,Thunnus albacares, in Sri Lankan waters
Maldeniya, R. (1996) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/bf00002384 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Izzo, C., Ward, T. M., Ivey, A. R., Suthers, I. M., Stewart, J., Sexton, S. C., & Gillanders, B. M. (2017) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-017-9468-z · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Foreign Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing in Somali Waters Perpetuates Conflict
Glaser, S. M., Roberts, P. M., & Hurlburt, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00704 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Stéquert, B. (2001) · Aquatic Living Resources · doi:10.1016/s0990-7440(01)01126-3 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Grande, M., Murua, H., Zudaire, I., Goñi, N., & Bodin, N. (2014) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.04.011 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation(2005) · Zoological studies · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Netting Billions: A Global Valuation of Tuna
Macfadyen, G., Huntington, T., Defaux, V., et al. (2016) · Cited by 47 · see citing works
SONG, L. M., Zhang, Y., Xu, L. X., Jiang, W. X., & WANG, J. Q. (2008) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00476.x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Song, L.-M., Zhou, J., Zhou, Y.-Q., Nishida, T., Jiang, W.-X., & Wang, J.-Q. (2009) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-009-9474-7 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Mullins, R. B., McKeown, N. J., Sauer, W. H. H., & Shaw, P. W. (2018) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsy102 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Chiang, H.-C., Hsu, C.-C., Wu, G. C.-C., Chang, S., & Yang, H. (2007) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2007.11.006 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Walmsley, S. F., Purvis, J., & Ninnes, C. (2006) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.08.006 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Dammannagoda, S. T., Hurwood, D. A., & Mather, P. B. (2008) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2007.10.006 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Reproductive Biology of Yellowfin Tuna T. albacares in the West-Central Indian Ocean
Zhu, G., Xu, L., Zhou, Y., & Song, L. (2008) · Journal of Ocean University of China · doi:10.1007/s11802-008-0327-3 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Menezes, M. R., Ikeda, M., & Taniguchi, N. (2006) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.00993.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flynn, A. J., & Paxton, J. (2012) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf12185 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Nursery origin of yellowfin tuna in the Hawaiian Islands
Wells, R. J. D., Rooker, J. R., & Itano, D. (2012) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09833 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Eveson, J. P., Million, J., Sardenne, F., & Le Croizier, G. (2015) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.05.016 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Appleyard, S. A., Ward, R. D., & Grewe, P. M. (2002) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1006/jfbi.2002.1866 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, G. C.-C., Chiang, H.-C., Chou, Y.-W., Wong, Z.-R., Hsu, C.-C., Chen, C.-Y., & Yang, H. (2010) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2010.03.015 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Menezes, M. R., Kumar, G., & Kunal, S. P. (2012) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03270.x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Zudaire, I., Murua, H., Grande, M., Goñi, N., Potier, M., Ménard, F., Chassot, E., & Bodin, N. (2015) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-015-2763-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationWelch, D. J., Newman, S. J., Buckworth, R. C., Ovenden, J. R., Broderick, D., Lester, R. J. G., Gribble, N. A., Ballagh, A. C., Charters, R. A., Stapley, J., et al. (2015) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.010 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Dammannagoda, S. T., Hurwood, D. A., & Mather, P. B. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f10-136 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
(1989) · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationArtetxe-Arrate, I., Fraile, I., Crook, D. A., Zudaire, I., Arrizabalaga, H., Greig, A., & Murua, H. (2019) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf19067 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationBycatch in the Maldivian pole-and-line tuna fishery
Miller, K. I., Nadheeh, I., Jauharee, A. R., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177391 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Fish piracy: combating illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing
Gray, K. M., Legg, F. G., & Andrews-Chouicha, E. (2004) · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Christ, H. J., White, R., Hood, L., Vianna, G. M. S., & Zeller, D. C. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00269 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Arai, T., Kotake, A., KAYAMA, S., et al. (2005) · Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom · doi:10.1017/s0025315405012336 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Effect of oceanic turbulence on the survival of yellowfin tuna larvae
Kimura, S., Nakata, H., Margulies, D., Suter, J., & HUNT, S. L. (2004) · NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI · doi:10.2331/suisan.70.175 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Dizon, A. E., Neill, W. H., & Magnuson, J. J. (1977) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/bf00001418 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Grande, M., Murua, H., Zudaire, I., & Korta, M. (2012) · Journal of Sea Research · doi:10.1016/j.seares.2012.06.008 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation(2012) · Eprints@CMFRI Open Access Institutional Repository (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute) · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Daily increment formation in otoliths of juvenile skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis
Tanabe, T., KAYAMA, S., Ogura, M., & Tanaka, S. (2003) · Fisheries Science · doi:10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00680.x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Population Genetic Structure of Tunas Inferred from Molecular Markers: A Review
Kumar, G., & Kocour, M. (2015) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2015.1024826 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
West Indian Ocean variability and East African fish catch
Jury, M. R., McClanahan, T. R., & Maina, J. M. (2010) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2010.04.006 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Grande, M., Murua, H., Zudaire, I., Arsenault‐Pernet, E. J., Pernet, F., & Bodin, N. (2016) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.13125 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationRomanov, E. V., Potier, M., Заморов, В. В., & Ménard, F. (2009) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-009-1151-z · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Potier, M., Romanov, E. V., Cherel, Y., Sabatié, R., Заморов, В. В., & Ménard, F. (2008) · Aquatic Living Resources · doi:10.1051/alr:2008026 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Tuna oceanography—an applied science
Sharp, G. D. (2001) · Fish physiology · doi:10.1016/s1546-5098(01)19010-2 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
An integrated Bayesian modeling approach for the growth of Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna
Dortel, E., Sardenne, F., Bousquet, N., Rivot, É., Million, J. M. F., Croizier, G. L., & Chassot, E. (2014) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.07.006 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Biological and environmental influence on tissue fatty acid compositions in wild tropical tunas
Sardenne, F., Kraffe, E., Amiel, A., Fouché, E., Debrauwer, L., Ménard, F., & Bodin, N. (2017) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.11.007 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Adam, M. S. (2002) · Aquatic Living Resources · doi:10.1016/s0990-7440(02)01155-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Genetic diversity of skipjack tuna in the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans
FUJINO, K., SASAKI, K., & OKUMURA, S.-I. (1981) · NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI · doi:10.2331/suisan.47.215 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Fecundity regulation strategy of the yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Western Indian Ocean
Zudaire, I., Murua, H., Grande, M., Korta, M., Arrizabalaga, H., Areso, J. J., & Delgado-Molina, A. (2012) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2012.07.022 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationAndrews, A. H., Pacicco, A. E., Allman, R. J., Falterman, B. J., Lang, E. T., & Golet, W. J. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2019-0328 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
(2011) · Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · Cited by 25 · see citing works
(2004) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Distribution of tuna larvae between Madagascar and the Equator, Indian Ocean
Conand, F., & Richards, W. J. (1982) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kornilova, G. N. (1980) · Journal of Ichthyology · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Appleyard, S. A., Ward, R. D., & Grewe, P. M. (2002) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01701.x · Cited by 21
La fécondité du listao<i>(Katsuwonus</i><i>pelamis)</i>de l'ouest de l'océan Indien
Stéquert, B., & Ramcharrun, B. (1995) · Aquatic Living Resources · doi:10.1051/alr:1995006 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Shih, C.-L., Hsu, C.-C., & Chen, C.-Y. (2013) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2013.09.009 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Smale, M. J. (1986) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00643.x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Bard, F.-X., Kouame, B. K., & Hervé, A. (2002) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Kim, Y., Delgado, D., Cano, I. A., & Sawada, Y. (2015) · Fisheries Science · doi:10.1007/s12562-015-0901-8 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Seychelles Tuna Fishery and Climate Change
Marsac, F. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119154051.ch16 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Indian Ocean Tuna tagging programme: building better science for more sustainability
Murua, H., Eveson, J. P., & Marsac, F. (2015) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.07.001 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationMenezes, M. R., Noguchi, D., Nakajima, M., & Taniguchi, N. (2008) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01912.x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Movement of juvenile tuna deduced from parasite data
Moore, B. R., Lestari, P., Cutmore, S. C., Proctor, C., & Lester, R. J. G. (2019) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz022 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Varghese, S. P. (2016) · Indian Journal of Fisheries · doi:10.21077/ijf.2016.63.1.39681-03 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hoyle, S. D., & Langley, A. D. (2020) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105586 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Qiu, F., Kitchen, A., Beerli, P., & Miyamoto, M. M. (2012) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.002 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
NISHIDA, T. (1992) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.1992.tb00033.x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Jatmiko, I., Zedta, R. R., Agustina, M., & Setyadji, B. (2019) · ILMU KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences · doi:10.14710/ik.ijms.24.2.61-68 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Marsac, F., Fonteneau, A., & Michaud, A. 1. (2014) · IRD Éditions eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.irdeditions.9700 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationBluefin tuna science remains vague
Collette, B. B. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3928 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Origin and Population Connectivity of Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Atlantic Ocean
Kitchens, L. L. (2017) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Morphometric Comparison of the Yellowfin Tuna from Six Grounds in the Indian Ocean
Kurogane, K., & HIYAMA, Y. (1958) · NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI · doi:10.2331/suisan.24.487 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
(1979) · Eprints@CMFRI Open Access Institutional Repository (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
PARASITES AS POTENTIAL STOCK MARKERS FOR TUNA IN INDONESIAN WATERS
Lestari, P., Lester, R. J. G., & Proctor, C. (2017) · Indonesian Fisheries Research Journal · doi:10.15578/ifrj.23.1.2017.23-28 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Nishida, T., Chow, S., & Grewe, P. (1998) · AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationBiological characteristics of bigeye tuna(Thunnus obesus) in southern and central Indian Ocean
Xu, L. (2010) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Nugraha, B., Baskoro, M. S., Pane, A. B., et al. (2017) · Indonesian Fisheries Research Journal · doi:10.15578/ifrj.16.1.2010.25-32 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Manach, F. L., Gough, C., Harris, A., Humber, F., Harper, S., & Zeller, D. (2016) · Global Atlas of Marine Fisheries · doi:10.2307/jj.41003803.158
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 181 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Bard, 1984, Croissance de l'albacore (Thunnus albacares) Atlantique d'après les données de marquage, Rec. Doc. Sci. ICCAT, 20, 104
- Fonteneau, 1980, La croissance de l'albacore de l'Atlantique, Est. Rec. Doc. Sci. ICCAT, 9, 152
- Goujon, 2010, Biological characteristics of tuna, FAO Fish. Aquac. Dep.
- Govindraj, 2000, Oceanic tuna resources in the north west region of Indian EEZ, Bull. Fish. Surv. India, 27, 20
- Graham, 1975, Heat exchange in the yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, and skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, and the adaptive significance of elevated body temperatures in scombrid fishes, Fish. Bull., 73, 219
- Hassani, 1991, Sexual maturity spawning and fecundity of the yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) of the Western Indian Ocean, Indo-Pacific Tuna Manag. Prog. Coll. Work. Doc., 4, 1
- John, 1998, Some aspects on the reproductive biology of Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacres) in the Bay of Bengal, Bull. Fish. Surv. India, 26, 42
- Joseph, 1963, Fecundity of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) from the Pacific Ocean, Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Comm. Bull., 7, 257
- Kume, 1971, Stock structure of the Indian bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus (Lowe), on the basis of distribution, size composition and sexual maturity, Bull. Far Seas Fish. Res. Lab, 4, 141
- Majid, 1991, Status of yellowfin tuna (Thuunus albacares) fishery in Pakistan, IPTP Coll. Vol. Work. Doc., 34
- Marsac, 1991, Growth of Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna estimated from size frequencies data collected on French purse seiners. TWS/91/17, IPTP, Coll. Vol. Work. Doc., 6, 34
- Marsac, 1998, Interannual and ENSO-associated variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system with possible impacts on the yellowfin tuna fisheries of the Indian and Atlantic oceans, Coll. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 345
- Marsac, 1999, Oceanographic changes during the 1997–1998 El Niño in the Indian Ocean and their impact on the purse seine fishery. 1st session of the IOTC working party on tropical tunas, Mahe, Seychelles, 4–8/09/99. WPTT/99/03, IOTC Proc., 2, 147
- Morita, 1970, Some consideration on the population structure of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean based on the longline fishery data, Bull. Far. Seas Fish. Res. Lab, 4, 125
- Nishida, 2001, RFLP analysis on single copy nuclear gene loci in yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) to examine the genetic differentiation between the western and eastern, IOTC Proc., 4, 437
- Olivier, 2002, Study of the growth of Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Western Indian Ocean based on length frequency data, IOTC Proc., 5, 316
- Potier, 2002, On-going research activities on trophic ecology of tuna in equatorial ecosystems of Indian Ocean, IOTC Proc., 5, 368
- Shuford, 2007, Elemental fingerprints in otoliths of juvenile yellowfin tuna from spawning grounds in the Atlantic Ocean, Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 60, 314
- Shung, 1973, The sexual activity of yellowfin tuna caught by the longline fishery in the Indian Ocean based on the examination of ovaries, Bull. Far Seas Fish. Res. Lab., 9, 123
- Solovieff, 1970, Distribution and biology of bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean, Rybn. Khoz., 3, 313
- Stéquert, 1976, Etude de la maturité sexuelle, de la ponte et de la fécondité du listao (Katsuwonus pelamis) de la côte nord-ouest de Madagascar, Cah. ORSTOM. Série Océanographie, 14, 227
- Stéquert, 1996, Age and growth of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, from the western Indian Ocean, based on otolith microstructure, Oceanogr. Lit. Rev., 43
- Stobberup, 1998, A review of the biology of bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus, and fisheries for this species in the Indian Ocean, 81
- Ye, 2003, Study on tuna longline fishery in the Eastern Indian Ocean: The Biology of Thunnus obesus Captured, Ocean Univ. Qingdao, 33, 343
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cai, W.-W., Hu, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2022) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md20100626 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“However, Skipjack tuna becomes the most important raw material for tuna canning industry due to its low value [32,33].”
BackgroundKong, J., Hu, X., Cai, W.-W., Wang, Y., Chi, C., & Wang, B. (2023) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md21020105 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Wang, J., Wang, Y.-M., Li, L., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.813780 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) is the main resource of canned fish and shares of more than 70% of tuna catches (3, 26, 27).”
BackgroundHu, L., Zhang, H., Hu, Z., et al. (2022) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111509 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Tan, Z., Yang, X., Zhao, W., Ma, J., Fan, X., Liu, Z., & Dong, X. (2025) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.143365 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A fishing route optimization decision support system: The case of the tuna purse seiner
Granado, I., Hernando, L., Uriondo, Z., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023.07.009 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Zhang, N., Yang, R., Fu, Z., Yu, G., & Ma, Z. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13223454 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“A low salinity of 28.5‰ has been observed off the coast of Hainan, China [20], but the optimal salinity for yellowfin tuna growth is 31.2 to 33.3‰ [21].”
BackgroundInfluentialImpact of Salinity Changes on the Antioxidation of Juvenile Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares)
Zhou, S., Zhang, N., Fu, Z., Yu, G., Ma, Z., & Zhao, L. (2023) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse11010132 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Hu, L., Zhang, H., Hu, Z., et al. (2022) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109162 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Tan, Z., Yang, X., Yu, X., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., & Dong, X. (2025) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116605 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Dupaix, A., Ménard, F., Filmalter, J. D., et al. (2024) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12813 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationCosta, E. F. S., Campanyà‐Llovet, N., Cuvelier, D., Menezes, G. M. M., & Colaço, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1243918 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Artetxe-Arrate, I., Fraile, I., Farley, J. H., Darnaude, A. M., Clear, N., Dettman, D. L., Davies, C. R., Marsac, F., & Murua, H. (2021) · Oceans · doi:10.3390/oceans2030026 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“However, the lack of studies at an oceanic scale impedes a global overview of the current stock structure of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean [11].”
BackgroundSelf-citationOkemwa, G. M., Abubakar, A. A., Mzingirwa, F., Kimani, E. N., Kamau, J. N., Njiru, J. M., & Sauer, W. (2023) · Regional Studies in Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2023.102877 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Hasyim, S., Hidayat, R., Farhum, S. A., & Zainuddin, M. (2022) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d230459 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Syamsuddin, M., Subiyanto, S., Bratasena, T., Syamsudin, F., Purba, N. P., Ihsan, Y. N., Puspita, A., Zainuddin, M., & Nofrita, N. (2024) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106049.2024.2408281 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hidayat, R., Zainuddin, M., Mallawa, A., Mustapha, M. A., & Putri, A. R. S. (2021) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d220905 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Liu, M., Jiang, J. H., Xu, D., et al. (2024) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141787 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nur, M., Tenriware, T., & Nasyrah, A. F. A. (2023) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d241005 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…amino acids, unsaturated fats crucial for nutritional needs, growth enhancement, cognitive benefits, cholesterol reduction, and various health advantages (Nepomuceno et al. 2020; Rampazzo et al. 2020; Wibowo et al. 2020; Artetxe-Arrate et al. 2021; Husain et al. 2021; Bintoro et al. 2023).”
BackgroundIstnaeni, Z. D., Gaol, J. L., Zainuddin, M., & Fitrianah, D. (2023) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d240948 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Huang, J., Fu, Z., Yu, W., et al. (2025) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse13030602 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Widely distributed across global tropical and subtropical waters, yellowfin tuna thrive in warm waters and exhibit strong temperature adaptability [12].”
Genomic differentiation and interoceanic population structure of two large pelagic scombrid species
Weist, P., Kusche, H., Tørresen, O., Hermida, M., Lopes, E. P., Jentoft, S., & Hanel, R. (2024) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03117 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ougier, S., Pascal Bach, A., Loc’h, F. L., et al. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173842 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lian, P., & Gao, L. (2024) · Journal of Oceanology and Limnology · doi:10.1007/s00343-023-2330-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ghifary, M., Nugroho, M. A. A., Barokah, B., Purwarianti, A., Birowo, C. T., Machdi, I., Gaol, F. L., Purnama, I. K. E., Riandi, O., Azhar, T. N., et al. (2023) · Penerbit BRIN eBooks · doi:10.55981/brin.668 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The effect of climate oscillations on skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the Indian Ocean
Liu, S., Zhang, L., Wang, R., Song, P., Miao, X., Li, H., Li, Y., & Lin, L. (2023) · Journal of Marine Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2023.103939 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fraile, I., Luque, P., Campana, S. E., Farley, J. H., Krusic‐Golub, K., Clear, N., Eveson, J. P., Artetxe-Arrate, I., Zudaire, I., Murua, H., et al. (2024) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps14555 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, Y., Zhang, Y., Geng, Z., & Zhu, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2024.1392273 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Fei, J., Zhang, J., Wang, X., et al. (2025) · Fishes · doi:10.3390/fishes10040164 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Báez, J. C., Czerwinski, I. A., Ramos, M. L., et al. (2025) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/fog.12743 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Laiz‐Carrión, R., Borrego‐Santos, R., Quintanilla-Hervás, J. M., Quezada‐Romegialli, C., Malca, E., Swalethorp, R., Abascal, F. J., Pennino, M. G., Vargas‐Yáñez, M., Johnstone, C., et al. (2025) · Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2025.105585 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Abdussamad, E. M., Surya, S., Koya, K. P. S., Rohit, P., Abbas, A. M., Prakasan, D., & Ismail, S. (2024) · Indian Journal of Fisheries · doi:10.21077/ijf.2024.71.1.131129-17 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“However, escalating fishing pressure over recent decades has raised concerns regarding their sustainable utilisation and management (Artetxe-Arrate et al., 2021), as any substantial fluctuations in their abundance could precipitate trophic cascades (Heithaus et al., 2008) and substantially impact…”
BackgroundResultXu, H. Z., Fujimori, Y., Tomiyasu, M., et al. (2025) · Fisheries Science · doi:10.1007/s12562-025-01866-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Yellowfin tuna (YFT, Thunnus albacares ) ranks as the second largest economically significant species in tuna fisheries (Torres-Faurrieta et al. 2016), with a widespread distribution in the tropical and subtropical regions of the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans (Artetxe-Arrate et al. 2021).”
Hu, L., Zhu, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2024) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114462 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Domínguez‐Bustos, Á. R., Cabrera‐Castro, R., Ramos, M. L., Abaunza, P., & Báez, J. C. (2024) · Fisheries Management and Ecology · doi:10.1111/fme.12749 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lurkpranee, S., & Kitakado, T. (2024) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107256 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Variability of Autumn Tropical Pacific Yellowfin Tuna Tied to the Spring North Atlantic Tripole
Zhang, G., & Li, J.-P. (2025) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2024gl114459 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Deteksi Objek dan Pengukuran Panjang serta Berat Ikan Menggunakan YOLOv3-ResNet18
Liawatimena, S., Abdurahman, E., Trisetyarso, A., & Wibowo, A. (2023) · Penerbit BRIN eBooks · doi:10.55981/brin.668.c554 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Liu, M., Jiang, J., Xu, D., et al. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4883100
Fuatkait, D. S., Baesardy, E. J., & Batlajery, A. (2024) · Amanisal Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Perikanan Tangkap · doi:10.30598/amanisal.v13i2.14353
“Pertumbuhan ikan cakalang dipengaruhi oleh faktor biologis seperti pertumbuhan gonad dan jenis kelamin(Bintoro et al., 2021), serta faktor fisik seperti suhu (Artetxe-Arrate et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMzingirwa, F., Okemwa, G., Farthing, M., Bova, C. S., Halafo, J., Mshana, J., Abubakar, A. A., Ishmael, N., & Sauer, W. (2025) · African Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.2989/1814232x.2024.2425717
A Flotsam-Associated Fishery in the Indian Ocean, and Potential Impact on Pelagic By-Catch SpeciesPreprint
Punyadeva, N. B. P., Deepananda, K. H. M. A., Gunawardane, N. D. P., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5262945
Jiang, M.-F., Wang, J.-T., & Chen, X.-J. (2025) · Acta Oceanologica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s13131-025-2488-y
Meat Grade Prediction of Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus Albacares) Using EfficientNetB3
Fernandez, K. J. G., Mantawil, M. D. C., Reño, A. J. B., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM) · doi:10.1109/hnicem64917.2024.11258639
“Thunnus Albacares (Yellowfin Tuna) is a commercially significant fish species, highly prized in global sashimi and canned tuna markets due to its rich flavor and texture [1].”
Liang, T.-Y., Lan, K., & Wu, Y. (2026) · Fisheries Science · doi:10.1007/s12562-026-01960-3
“YFT primarily inhabit the central and northern Indian Ocean (30° S to 20° N) with a preference for temperatures of 15–17.9 °C (Song et al. 2008; Artetxe-Arrate et al. 2021), while BET is mainly distributed in the central Indian Ocean at 12–13.9 °C (Song et al. 2009; Artetxe-Arrate et al. 2021).”
InfluentialZhang, J., Chen, X., Song, H., Zhang, H., Zhu, G., Teng, Y., & Shi, J. (2026) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1093/mcfafs/vtaf048
Lurkpranee, S., & Kitakado, T. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7038571
Legie, V. S., Kolondam, B. J., & Rumondor, M. J. (2026) · International Journal of Research and Review · doi:10.52403/ijrr.20260658
Mohamed, A. A., Omar, O. E., Gedi, O. A., & Ahmed, A. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2026.1848506
Wang, Y., Wang, M., Zou, Y., et al. (2026) · Aquaculture Reports · doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2026.103754
Li, X.-H., Huang, Q., Wang, F.-Y., Sheng, Y., & Wang, B. (2026) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2026.120350
Herdiana, Y., Hartati, I. D., Natsir, M., Chodrijah, U., Jafani, A. S., Darmawan, R., Nikijuluw, V. P. H., Prasetia, R., Simanjuntak, C. P. H., Wicaksono, V. A., et al. (2026) · Fishes · doi:10.3390/fishes11090504
Regional variability in growth and biometrics of yellowfin tuna in Indian waters
Kar, C., & Purkayastha, A. (2026) · Academia Biology · doi:10.20935/acadbiol8495
- Venue
- Advances in Marine Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 39-89
- ISSN
- 0065-2881 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094687832
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 181
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- archimer.ifremer.fr
- Licence
- Locations
- Advances in marine biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- tropical tuna, skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, bigeye tuna, Indian Ocean tuna fisheries, life history, stock structure, panmixia, biogeography, feeding ecology, growth, reproductive biology, genetic markers, otolith microchemistry, fish tagging, sustainable fisheries
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Fisheries, Fishes, Tuna, Indian Ocean
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review