Cited by 45Science Education and PedagogyExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesEducational Methods and Outcomes

Taking on the Heat—a Narrative Account of How Infrared Cameras Invite Instant Inquiry

Open access
Haglund, Jesper, Jeppsson, Fredrik, Schönborn, Konrad J.·2016·Research in Science Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11165-015-9476-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., & Schönborn, K. J.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Haglund, Jesper
Venue
Research in Science Education
Published
2015-06-12
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
685-713
ISSN
  • 0157-244X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1898
OpenAlex
W1638658198
Cited by
45
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
23.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Science Education (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
infrared camera, thermal sciences, heat, heat flow model, fourth grade, elementary school science, social learning, scientific models, group interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review