Cited by 451Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFirm Innovation and GrowthRegional Economics and Spatial Analysis

Infrastructure and entrepreneurship

Audretsch, David B., Heger, Diana, Veith, Tobias·2015·Small Business Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11187-014-9600-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Audretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Centre for European Economic Research (DE)
  • Rottenburg University of Applied Forest Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Veith, Tobias
Venue
Small Business Economics
Published
2014-08-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
219-230
ISSN
  • 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0913
OpenAlex
W2038344363
Cited by
451
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small Business Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
infrastructure, entrepreneurship, start-up activity, broadband, highways, railways, connectivity, entrepreneurial opportunity recognition, infrastructure policy, sectoral differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review