The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Price, D. J. D. S. (1963) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/pric91844 · Cited by 4,264
Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities
Goodwin, J., & Garfield, E. (1980) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3104125 · Cited by 1,639
(2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-2755-9 · Cited by 979
Communication among scientists and engineers
Nelson, C. E., & Pollock, D. (1970) · Cited by 472
Butler, L. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00007-0 · Cited by 447
Hicks, D. (1999) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02457380 · Cited by 388
The Four Literatures of Social Science
Hicks, D. (2006) · Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research · doi:10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_22 · Cited by 332
Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations
Clemens, E. S., Powell, W. W., McIlwaine, K., & Okamoto, D. (1995) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230730 · Cited by 290
A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences
Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(98)00028-4 · Cited by 279
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1989) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02093234 · Cited by 273
Cited by
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 · Cited by 5,274
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,002
Comparing alternatives to the web of science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature
Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001 · Cited by 733
Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective
Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Nederhof, A. J.
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-100
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2147002372
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
- The paper
- Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
