The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/520429a · Cited by 2,828
Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review
Nederhof, A. J. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2 · Cited by 786
Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use—A Literature Review
Rijcke, S. D., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv038 · Cited by 467
Quantity and/or Quality? The Importance of Publishing Many Papers
Sandström, U., & van den Besselaar, P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166149 · Cited by 146
The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns
Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., & Yudkevich, M. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101110 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, L.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-155
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095271263
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00007-0
- The paper
- Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00007-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
