Accuracy Evaluation of Scopus Author ID Based on the Largest Funding Database in Japan
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scopus AUIDs have high precision and recall: over 98% recall and 99% precision compared to a Japanese funding database.
“When compared to the largest Japan funding database, the recall and precision of Scopus AUIDs were over 98% and 99%, respectively, with the majority of authors having only one AUID [122].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [122]
Cites
Studying scientific migration in Scopus
Moed, H. F., Aisati, M. E., & Plume, A. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0783-9 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1971-x · Cited by 328 · see citing works
A brief survey of automatic methods for author name disambiguation
Ferreira, A. A., Gonçalves, M. A., & Laender, A. H. F. (2012) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/2350036.2350040 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Smalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2009) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2009.1440430113 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101698 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author‐based citation analysis?
Strotmann, A., & Zhao, D. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22695 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration
Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1307-6 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?
Laudel, G. (2003) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1024137718393 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Author Name Disambiguation by Using Deep Neural Network
Tran, H. N., Huynh, T., & Do, T. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05476-6_13 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Quantitative analysis of collaborative and mobility networks
Furukawa, T., Shirakawa, N., & Okuwada, K. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0360-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
‘Seed + expand’: a general methodology for detecting publication oeuvres of individual researchers
Reijnhoudt, L., Costas, R., Noyons, E., et al. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1256-0 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Yamashita, Y., & Yoshinaga, D. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1384-6 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Scientific mobility: An analysis of Germany, Austria, France and Great BritainPreprint
Conchi, S., & Michels, C. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Researcher Name Resolver: identifier management system for Japanese researchers
Kurakawa, K., Takeda, H., Takaku, M., et al. (2014) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-014-0109-z · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Metadata for Name Disambiguation and Collocation
Beall, J. (2010) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi2010001 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
Aman, V. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2895-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kawashima, H., & Tomizawa, H.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kawashima, Hirotaka
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2015-04-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1061-1071
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2057994224
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Optics and Image Analysis
- Keywords
- authorship attribution, precision and recall, Japanese researchers, bibliometric analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
