Influence of Omitted Citations on the Bibliometric Statistics of the Major Manufacturing Journals
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Notices of the American Mathematical Society
American Mathematical Society (2012) · Notices of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/noti · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Moed, H. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3714-7 · Cited by 1,334 · see citing works
On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals.
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001317097960 · Cited by 1,218 · see citing works
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists
Reynolds, M. R., & Ross, S. M. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269818 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor
Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V., Jorge, R. A., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.08-107938 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Adam, D. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415726a · Cited by 447 · see citing works
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment
Cagan, R. L. (2013) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.012955 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar
Li, J., Burnham, J. F., Lemley, T., & Britton, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries · doi:10.1080/15424065.2010.505518 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management)
Moed, H. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview
Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410810858010 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts
Jacso, P. (2006) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520610675816 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation
Hicks, D. M. (2008) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9154-0 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications
Schubert, A. P., & Glänzel, W. (1983) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02097178 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Moed, H. F. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21424 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Ike Antkare one of the great stars in the scientific firmament
Antkare, I. (2010) · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Errors in DOI Indexing by Bibliometric Databases
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationAccuracy of Cited References: The Role of Citation Databases
Buchanan, R. A. (2006) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.67.4.292 · Cited by 66 · cited 10× · see citing works
“The contributions by Buchanan (2006), Jacsó (2006), Li et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCiting-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor
Zitt, M. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.004 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals
Nix, J., Lowry, P. B., Humpherys, S. L., & Malwitz, J. (2007) · The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) · doi:10.1109/tpc.2007.908733 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Irreproducible Results—a Response to Thomson Scientific
Rossner, M., Epps, H. V., & Hill, E. (2008) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.200809957 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. A., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22898 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationScientific journal publishers and omitted citations in bibliometric databases: Any relationship?
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. A., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2014) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.003 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationRankings of information and library science journals by JIF and by h-type indices
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.006 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Jacsó, P. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0769-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. A. (2010) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.1174 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
Empirical Analysis and Classification of Database Errors in Scopus and Web of Science
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationDo Scopus and WoS Correct “Old” Omitted Citations?
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1867-8 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Franceschini, Fiorenzo
- Maisano, Domenico
- Mastrogiacomo, Luca
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2015-04-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1083-1122
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2030192775
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- citation errors, bibliometric databases, Web of Science, Scopus, impact factor, journal classification, citation statistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review