Are Leaders Really Leading? Journals That Are First in Web of Science Subject Categories in the Context of Their Groups
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While generally high correlation between journal ranks between WoS and Scopus were observed, considerable variations in rank for individual journals were also noticed.
“while generally high correlation between journal ranks between WoS and Scopus were observed to be high, considerable variations in rank for individual journals were also noticed”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [181]
Cites
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In 1972 Eugene Garfield published his seminal paper on journal ranking, and identified 7 journals with a JIF2 greater than 10 among the 152 most cited journals (Garfield 1972).”
BackgroundA review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22748 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Journal impact measures in bibliometric research
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1014848323806 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories
Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Ràfols, I. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20967 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2008) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Bollen, J., Rodriquez, M. A., & Herbert Van De Sompel, A. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0176-z · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. P. (2003) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1022378804087 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories
Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S. F., & Ràfols, I. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0784-8 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The evolution of research activity in Spain
Jiménez‐Contreras, E., Anegón, F. D. M., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00008-2 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online
Wittorf, R. (1996) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199610)47:10 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals
Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2002) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10153 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Ràfols, I., & Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21086 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23408 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
DELGADO‐LÓPEZ‐CÓZAR, E., & CABEZAS‐CLAVIJO, Á. (2013) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1087/20130206 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Boyack, K. W., & Wouters, P. F. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution
Mansilla, R., Köppen, E., Cocho, G., & Miramóntes, P. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.01.001 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
The Disaster of the Impact Factor
Moustafa, K. (2015) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9517-0 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Dorta–González, P., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0929-9 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Campanario, J. M. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0334-1 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the Stability of Citation-Based Journal Rankings
Pajić, D. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.005 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The journal Impact Factor and alternative metrics
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2016) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201642823 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0188-6 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
On first quartile journals which are not of highest impact
García, J. A., Sánchez, R. M. R., Fdez-Valdivia, J., et al. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0534-3 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ten good reasons to use the Eigenfactor™ metrics
Franceschet, M. (2010) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.001 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Ranking of the subject areas of Scopus
García, J. A., Sánchez, R. M. R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21589 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Mathematical derivation of the impact factor distribution
Egghe, L. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.01.004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
MuICE: Mutual Influence and Citation Exclusivity Author Rank
Amjad, T., Daud, A., Che, D., et al. (2015) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.12.001 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Chang, C., McAleer, M. J., & Oxley, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0335-0 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Epstein, D. (2007) · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A comparison of the Web of Science and publication-level classification systems of science
Perianes‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruiz‐Castillo, J. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.007 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The iceberg hypothesis revisited
Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero‐Bote, V. P., & Anegón, F. D. M. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0209-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Detecting impact factor manipulation with data mining techniques
Yang, D., Li, X., Sun, X., & Wan, J. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2144-6 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Neophilia ranking of scientific journals
Packalén, M., & Bhattacharya, J. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2157-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Confidence intervals for Journal Impact Factors
Bornmann, L. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2365-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The impact factor rank-order distribution revisited
Egghe, L. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0338-5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Jacsó, P. (2012) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521211276064 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Informetrics for librarians: Describing their important role in the evaluation process
Aguillo, I. F. (2016) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2016.ene.01 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The effect of additional citations in the stability of Journal Citation Report categories
Campanario, J. M., & Cabos, W. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1116-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationGarcía, J. A., Sánchez, R. M. R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22615 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Campanario, J. M. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2506-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
- Authors
- Campanario, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Campanario, Juan Miguel
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2018-02-02
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-130
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2785944772
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- leading journals, journal impact factor, journal rankings, Eigenfactor, altmetrics, citation analysis, journal publishers, ranking stability, Journal Citation Reports
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review