The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136099 · Cited by 3,615
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410810844150 · Cited by 1,607 · cited 2×
“Since Jorge Hirsch (2005) proposed the h-index, is has drawn increasingly higher attention by researchers, among which Egghe (2006), Jin et al. (2007), Bornmann and Daniel (2008), Bornmann et al. (2011), and Waltman and Van Eck (2012a) have a relatively large influence.”
BackgroundHow to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures
Eck, N. J. V., & Waltman, L. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21075 · Cited by 966
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 · Cited by 907
Cited by
Bibliometric analysis: The main steps
Passas, I. (2024) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia4020065 · Cited by 842
Xia, H., Liu, Z., Efremochkina, M., Liu, X., & Lin, C. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104009 · Cited by 341
Guo, L., Wang, D., Gu, F., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhou, R. (2021) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-021-09697-7 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Hou, J., Yang, X., & Chen, C.
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2018-03-07
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 869-892
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2791050802
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9
- The paper
- Hou, J., Yang, X., & Chen, C. (2018). Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
