The Application of Bibliometric Analysis: Disciplinary and User Aspects
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484 · see citing works
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386 · see citing works
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669 · see citing works
The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z · Cited by 3,139 · see citing works
Self-citationCitation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 · Cited by 2,942 · see citing works
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/520429a · Cited by 2,828 · see citing works
Performance-based university research funding systems
Hicks, D. M. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/(issn)2330-1643 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities
Wallin, J. A. (2005) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x · Cited by 913 · see citing works
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S. A., Jones, R. D., Kain, R. J. P., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M. A., et al. (2015) · Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4929.1363 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2007) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Michael Hall, C. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?
Weingart, P. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20806 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagné, É. (2006) · J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. · doi:10.1002/asi.20349 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Metrics: A profusion of measures
Noorden, R. V. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/465864a · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Abbott, A., Cyranoski, D., Jones, N., Maher, B., Schiermeier, Q., & Noorden, R. V. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/465860a · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Global biodiversity research during 1900–2009: a bibliometric analysis
Liu, X., Zhang, L., & Hong, S. (2011) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9981-z · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Leydesdorff, L., Wouters, P., & Bornmann, L. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2150-8 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review
Harvey, L. (2008) · Quality in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13538320802507711 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23408 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology
Glänzel, W. (1996) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02018475 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Grandjean, P., Eriksen, M. L., Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2011) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-10-96 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationUsage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage‐based impact metrics
Bollen, J., & Herbert Van De Sompel, A. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20746 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Universality of scholarly impact metricsPreprint
Kaur, J., Radicchi, F., & Menczer, F. (2013) · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Universality of scholarly impact metrics
Kaur, J., Radicchi, F., & Menczer, F. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.002 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
A bibliometric analysis of global Zika research
Martínez-Pulgarín, D. F., Acevedo-Mendoza, W. F., Cardona-Ospina, J. A., et al. (2015) · Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2015.07.005 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Analysis of the interdisciplinary nature of library and information science
Prebor, G. (2010) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000610380820 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Weller, K. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_16 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Bornmann, L., Stefaner, M., Anegón, F. D. M., & Mutz, R. (2013) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-12-2012-0214 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Competencies for bibliometrics
Cox, A. M., Gadd, E., Petersohn, S., & Sbaffi, L. (2017) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000617728111 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Surveying the Use of Theory in Library and Information Science Research: A Disciplinary Perspective
McKechnie, L. E. F., & Pettigrew, K. E. (2002) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 56 · see citing works
How to improve the use of metrics
Frey, B. S., & Osterloh, M. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/465870a · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The bibliometric bandwagon: Characteristics of bibliometric articles outside the field literature
Jonkers, K., & Derrick, G. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22620 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The metric tide: Literature review
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Wouters, P. F., et al. (2015) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.5066.3520 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The decade of metrics? Examining the evolution of metrics within and outside LIS
Larivière, V. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/bult.2012.1720380605 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Petersohn, S. (2016) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-150972 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Tide or Tsunami? The Impact of Metrics on Scholarly Research.
Bonnell, A. G. (2016) · Australian universities' review · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ellegaard, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Ellegaard, Ole
- ORCID
- Ellegaard, Ole
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2018-05-04
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-202
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2773943570
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- bibliometric analysis, library and information science, disciplinary differences, citation patterns, keyword co-occurrence, citation impact, interdisciplinary research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review