Digital competences, computer skills and information literacy in secondary education: mapping and visualization of trends and concepts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fragmentation is in line with Stopar and Bartol (2019), who also identify distinct research clusters.
“This fragmentation of research in this field is in line with Stopar and Bartol (2019) who also identify distinct research clusters.”
From Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining (2022) · cites this paper as Stopar and Bartol (2019)
Cites
Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding.
Ala-Mutka, K. (2011) · European Commission, JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.18046.00322 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
“The impact of digital society is also studied in relation to education (Di Giacomo et al., 2017; Pinto et al., 2020) and research (Ferreira-Mello et al., 2019; Stopar & Bartol, 2019).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Stopar, K., & Bartol, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Ljubljana (SI)
- Corresponding author
- Bartol, Tomaž
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2018-12-19
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-498
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2904350434
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 101.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (J5-8230, P4-0085)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- digital skills, computer skills, information literacy, ICT education, secondary education, science mapping, co-citation analysis, research trends, terminology evolution, interdisciplinary collaboration, 21st century skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
