CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41Publishing and Scholarly Communicationscientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Market Power of Publishers in Setting Article Processing Charges for Open Access Journals

Open access
Asai, Sumiko·2020·Scientometrics
DOI 10.1007/s11192-020-03402-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-020-03402-y

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A major difference of OA from the traditional subscription-based model is that coverage of article processing charges is redirected from publishers to authors.

    “the major difference of OAfrom the traditional subscription-based model is that, in OA publishing, method coverage of article processing charges (APCs) is redirected from publishers to authors [130,161]”

    From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [161]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Asai, S.
Affiliations
Meiji University (JP)
Corresponding author
Asai, Sumiko
ORCID
Asai, Sumiko
Venue
Scientometrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-02-29
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
1037-1049
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
DOI
10.1007/s11192-020-03402-y
OpenAlex
W3006876445
Cited by
41
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
24.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Meiji Repository (M-REPO) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K03470)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
article processing charges, open access journals, market power, citation impact, journal size, mergers and acquisitions, scholarly publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review