The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Sample Characteristics and Experience with Infidelity on Romantic Jealousy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is further supported by the work of Varga et al., who observed that age may have a moderating effect on the gender differences concerning sexual versus emotional jealousy [116].”
From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [116]
Citations
Cites
Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x · Cited by 1,263
Harris, C. R. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0702_102-128 · Cited by 344
Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement?
DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1103 · Cited by 286
Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective.
Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008) · Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0099345 · Cited by 249
Sexual and Romantic Jealousy in Heterosexual and Homosexual Adults
Harris, C. R. (2002) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00402 · Cited by 189
Sabini, J., & Green, M. C. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204264012 · Cited by 111
Sex Differences in Jealousy in Response to Actual Infidelity
Edlund, J. E., Heider, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Farc, M.-M., & Sagarin, B. J. (2006) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470490600400137 · Cited by 83
Green, M. C., & Sabini, J. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.330 · Cited by 68 · cited 3×
“One study completed with a representative adult sample found no gender difference ( Green and Sabini 2006 ), while other studies with college-age samples demonstrated a gender difference in the expected direction (e.g.”
BackgroundInfluentialEvolutionary and social cognitive explanations of sex differences in romantic jealousy
Ward, J., & Voracek, M. (2004) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530412331283381 · Cited by 33
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.654 · Cited by 23
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Becker, D. V., Sagarin, B. J., Guadagno, R. E., Millevoi, A., & Nicastle, L. D. (2004). When the sexes need not differ: Emotional responses to the sexual and emotional aspects of infidelity. Personal Relationships, 11, 529–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00096.x . · DOI
- Berman, M. I., & Frazier, P. A. (2005). Relationship power and betrayal experience as predictors of reactions to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1617–1627. doi: 10.1177/0146167205277209 . · DOI
- Brase, G. L., Caprar, D. V., & Voracek, M. (2004). Sex differences in responses to relationship threats in England and Romania. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 21, 763–764. doi: 10.1177/0265407504047836 . · DOI
- Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free.
- Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., & Westen, D. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Not gone, not forgotten, and not explained by alternative hypotheses. Psychological Science, 7, 373–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00392.x . · DOI
- Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Choe, J. C., Lim, H. K., Hasegawa, M., Hasegawa, T., & Bennett, K. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6, 121–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00215.x . · DOI
- Buunk, B., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00389.x . · DOI
- Dantzker, M. L., & Eisenman, R. (2005). Sexual attitudes among Hispanic students at a border university: Gender differences and failure to support Buss’s jealousy theory. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 26, 71–80.
- de Souza, A. A. L., Verderane, M. P., Taira, J. T., & Otta, E. (2006). Emotional and sexual jealousy as a function of sex and sexual orientation in a Brazilian sample. Psychological Reports, 98, 529–535. doi: 10.2466/PR0.98.2.529-535 . · DOI
- DeSteno, D. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the “fitness” of the model. Psychological Science, 7, 367–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00391.x . · DOI
- Eisenman, R., & Dantzker, M. L. (2006). Gender and ethnic differences in sexual attitudes at a Hispanic-serving university. The Journal of General Psychology, 133, 153–162. doi: 10.3200/GENP.133.2.153-162 . · DOI
- Fernandez, A. M., Vera-Villarroel, P., Sierra, J. C., & Zubeidat, I. (2007). Distress in response to emotional and sexual infidelity: Evidence of evolved gender differences in Spanish students. The Journal of Psychology, 14, 17–24. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.141.1.17-24 . · DOI
- Geary, D. C., DeSoto, M. C., Hoard, M. K., Sheldon, M. S., & Cooper, M. L. (2001). Estrogens and relationship jealousy. Human Nature, 12, 299–320. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1001-2 . · DOI
- Grice, J. W., & Seely, E. (2000). The evolution of sex differences in jealousy: Failure to replicate previous results. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 348–356. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2284 . · DOI
- Harris, C. R. (2000). Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1082–1091. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1082 . · DOI
- Harris, C. R. (2003a). Factors associated with jealousy over real and imagined infidelity: An examination of the social-cognitive and evolutionary psychology perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 319–329. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00112 . · DOI
- Harris, C. R., & Christenfeld, N. (1996). Gender, jealousy, and reason. Psychological Science, 7, 364–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00390.x . · DOI
- Hupka, R. B., & Bank, A. L. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution or social construction? Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 24–59. doi: 10.1177/106939719603000102 . · DOI
- Kimeldorf, M. B. (2009). Reactions to infidelity: Individual, gender, and situational predictors of relationship outcome and forgiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 69(7-B), 4427.
- Levy, K. N., & Kelly, K. M. (2010). Sex differences in jealousy: A contribution from attachment theory. Psychological Science, 21, 166–173. doi: 10.1177/0956797609357708 . · DOI
- Mathes, E. W. (2005). Relationship between short-term sexual strategies and sexual jealousy. Psychological Reports, 96, 29–35. doi: 10.2466/pr0.96.1.29-35 . · DOI
- Miller, S. L., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Sex differences in response to sexual versus emotional infidelity: The role of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 287–291. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.013 . · DOI
- Murphy, M. M., Vallacher, R. R., Shackelford, T. K., Bjorklund, D. F., & Yunger, J. L. (2006). Relationship experience as a predictor of romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 761–769. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.004 . · DOI
- Pietrzak, R. H., Laird, J. D., Stevens, D. A., & Thompson, N. S. (2002). Sex differences in human jealousy: A coordinated study of forced-choice, continuous rating-scale, and physiological responses on the same subjects. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 83–94. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00078-2 . · DOI
- Sagarin, B. J. (2005). Reconsidering evolved sex differences in jealousy: Comment on Harris (2003). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 62–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_5 . · DOI
- Sagarin, B. J., & Guadagno, R. E. (2004). Sex differences in the context of extreme jealousy. Personal Relationships, 11, 319–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00085.x . · DOI
- Sagarin, B. J., Becker, D. V., Guadagno, R. E., Nicastle, L. D., & Millevoi, A. (2003). Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy: The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 17–23. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00106-X . · DOI
- Schutzwohl, A. (2007). Decision strategies in continuous ratings of jealousy feelings elicited by sexual and emotional infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 815–828. Retrieved from http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep05815828.pdf . · DOI
- Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 299–307. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000202 . · DOI
- Sheets, V. L., & Wolfe, M. D. (2001). Sexual jealousy in heterosexuals, lesbians, and gays. Sex Roles, 44, 255–276. doi: 10.1023/A:1010996631863 . · DOI
- Takahashi, H., Matsuura, M., Yahata, N., Koeda, M., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2006). Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity. NeuroImage, 32, 1299–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.049 . · DOI
- Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
- Voracek, M. (2001). Marital status as a candidate moderator variable of male-female differences in sexual jealousy: The need for representative population samples. Psychological Reports, 88, 553–566. doi: 10.2466/PR0.88.2.553-566 . · DOI
- Wade, T. J., & Fowler, K. (2006). Sex differences in response to sexual and emotional infidelity: Considerations of rival attractiveness and financial status. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 37–50. doi: 10.1556/JCEP.4.2006.1.3 . · DOI
- Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). Gender differences in sexual jealousy: Adaptionist or social learning explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 115–140. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(93)90011-6 . · DOI
- Wiederman, M. W., & Kendall, E. (1999). Evolution, sex, and jealousy: Investigation with a sample from Sweden. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 121–128. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00046-4 . · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences
Rokach, A., & Chan, S. H. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20053904 · Cited by 77
What is Infidelity? A Vignette Study on Norms and Attitudes toward Infidelity
Bozoyan, C., & Schmiedeberg, C. (2023) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2022.2104194 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Varga, C. M., Gee, C. B., & Munro, G.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Towson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Varga, Colleen M.
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 2011-07-28
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 854-866
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2106866492
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- romantic jealousy, infidelity, sexual infidelity, emotional infidelity, gender differences, age differences, hypothetical scenarios, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review