Cited by 286Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEmotions and Moral Behavior

Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement?

DeSteno, David, Bartlett, Monica Y., Braverman, Julia, Salovey, Peter·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two studies are presented that challenge the evidentiary basis for the existence of evolved sex differences in jealousy. In opposition to the evolutionary view, Study I demonstrated that a sex difference in jealousy resulting from sexual versus emotional infidelity is observed only when judgments are recorded using a forced-choice response format. On all other measures, no sex differences were found; both men and women reported greater jealousy in response to sexual infidelity. A second study revealed that the sex difference on the forced-choice measure disappeared under conditions of cognitive constraint. These findings suggest that the sex difference used to support the evolutionary view of jealousy (e.g., D. M. Buss, R. Larsen, D. Westen, & J. Semmelroth, 1992; D. M. Buss et al., 1999) likely represents a measurement artifact resulting from a format-induced effortful decision strategy and not an automatic, sex-specific response shaped by evolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1103

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anger was identified as a major component of the response to infidelity.

    “Anger was identified as a major component of the response to infidelity [25,26].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2002-11
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
1103-1116
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2135727864
Cited by
286
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
jealousy, sex differences, evolutionary psychology, sexual infidelity, emotional infidelity, measurement artifacts, response format effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attitude, Biological Evolution, Extramarital Relations, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Jealousy, Male, Random Allocation, Sexual Behavior, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review