Cited by 140Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Validation of the satisfaction with life scale to Brazilians: evidences of measurement noninvariance across Brazil and US

Open access
Zanon, Cristian, Bardagi, Marucia P., Layous, Kristin, Hutz, Claudio S.·2014·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-013-0478-5

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zanon, C., Bardagi, M. P., Layous, K., & Hutz, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade São Francisco (BR)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Zanon, Cristian
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
443-453
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W1986849114
Cited by
140
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (Universidad Católica de Colombia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Satisfaction with Life Scale, subjective well-being, cross-cultural invariance, gender differences, cross-national comparison, scale validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review