Cited by 71Philosophy and History of ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy, Science, and History

External representations and scientific understanding

Open access
Kuorikoski, Jaakko, Ylikoski, Petri·2015·Synthese

Published version of a preprint

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11229-014-0591-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 71

Authors
Kuorikoski, J., & Ylikoski, P.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Ylikoski, Petri
Venue
Synthese
Published
2014-11-12
Volume
192
Issue
12
Pages
3817-3837
ISSN
  • 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0964
OpenAlex
W2106852830
Cited by
71
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
23.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Synthese (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
Keywords
external representations, scientific models, inferentialism, extended cognition, scientific understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review