External representations and scientific understanding
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some of the robotics-related frameworks found in reinforcement learning settings provide explanations for policies that a robot selects at a given time step [132], [156].
“Moreover, some of the robotics-related frameworks found in reinforcement learning settings provide explanations for policies that a robot selects at a given time step [132], [156].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
Plan explicability is reformulated in terms of its comprehensibility by an end-user.
“As plan explicability is reformulated in terms of its comprehensibility by an end-user.”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
The robot's model is adapted to the updates of human's model of the problem.
“The robot's model is adapted to the updates of human's model of the problem.”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
Chakraborti et al. formulate the multi-model planning problem as a tuple consisting of the planner's model of the problem and the corresponding human approximation thereof.
“In addition, Chakraborti et al. formulate the multi-model planning problem as a tuple consisting of the planner's model of the problem and the corresponding human approximation thereof [132].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
Numerical counterfactual explanations can be extracted from interpretable feature-value pairs as a result of pruning in the search space.
“They can be extracted from interpretable featurevalue pairs as a result of pruning in the search space [132].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
It is worth noting that the run-time of explanation generation algorithms is reported in addition to the evaluation metrics for several frameworks.
“It is worth noting that the run-time of explanation generation algorithms is reported in addition to the evaluation metrics for several frameworks [132], [139], [146], [152], [156], [159].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Kuorikoski, J., & Ylikoski, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Ylikoski, Petri
- Venue
- Synthese
- Published
- 2014-11-12
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3817-3837
- ISSN
- 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0964
- OpenAlex
- W2106852830
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 23.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Synthese (publishedVersion)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Keywords
- external representations, scientific models, inferentialism, extended cognition, scientific understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review