Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Universally coupled massive gravity

Pitts, J. B., Schieve, W. C.·2007·Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
DOI 10.1007/s11232-007-0055-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11232-007-0055-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. R. Schulmann, A. J. Kox, M. Janssen, and J. Illy, eds., The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 8, The Berlin Years: Correspondence, 1914–1918, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J. (1998); A. Beck and D. Howard, eds., The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 4, The Swiss Years: Writings, 1912–1914, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J. (1996); M. Janssen, Ann. Phys. (8), 14, No. S1, 58 (2005).
  2. M. Janssen and J. Renn, “Untying the knot: How Einstein found his way back to field equations discarded in the Zurich notebook,” in: The Genesis of General Relativity: Sources and Interpretations (Boston Stud. Phil. Sci., Vol. 250, J. Renn, ed.), Vol. 2, Einstein’s Zurich Notebook: Commentary and Essays, Springer, New York (2007); http://www.tc.umn.edu/~janss011/pdf%20files/knot.pdf. · DOI
  3. M. Fierz and W. Pauli, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 173, 211 (1939); N. Rosen, Phys. Rev., 57, 147, 150 (1940); A. Papapetrou, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect. A, 52, 11 (1948); S. N. Gupta, Phys. Rev., 96, 1683 (1954). · DOI · Paper page
  4. R. H. Kraichnan, Phys. Rev., 98, 1118 (1955). · DOI
  5. M. Kohler, Z. Phys., 134, 286 (1953). · DOI
  6. R. P. Feynman, F. B. Morinigo, W. G. Wagner, B. Hatfield, J. Preskill, and K. S. Thorne, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1995).
  7. V. I. Ogievetsky and I. V. Polubarinov, Ann. Phys., 35, 167 (1965). · DOI · Paper page
  8. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev., 138, B988 (1965). · DOI · Paper page
  9. S. Deser, Gen. Relativity Gravitation, 1, 9 (1970); arXiv:gr-qc/0411023v2 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  10. L. P. Grishchuk, A. N. Petrov, and A. D. Popova, Comm. Math. Phys., 94, 379 (1984). · DOI
  11. A. A. Logunov and M. A. Mestvirishvili, Theor. Math. Phys., 86, 1 (1991). · DOI
  12. J. B. Pitts and W. C. Schieve, Gen. Relativity Gravitation, 33, 1319 (2001); arXiv: gr-qc/0101058v2 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  13. J. B. Pitts and W. C. Schieve, Found. Phys., 34, 211 (2004); arXiv:gr-qc/0406102v1 (2004). · DOI
  14. N. Boulanger and M. Esole, Class. Q. Grav., 19, 2107 (2002); arXiv:gr-qc/0110072v2 (2001). · DOI
  15. S. Deser, Class. Q. Grav., 4, L99 (1987). · DOI
  16. N. Boulanger, T. Damour, L. Gualtieri, and M. Henneaux, Nucl. Phys. B, 597, 127 (2001); arXiv:hep-th/0007220v2 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  17. S. V. Babak and L. P. Grishchuk, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 024038 (2000); arXiv:gr-qc/9907027v2 (1999). · DOI
  18. N. Pinto-Neto, and P. I. Trajtenberg, Braz. J. Phys., 30, No. 1, 181 (2000). · DOI
  19. T. Padmanabhan, “From gravitons to gravity: Myths and reality,” arXiv:gr-qc/0409089v1 (2004). · arXiv
  20. M. Visser, Gen. Relativity Gravitation, 30, 1717 (1998); arXiv:gr-qc/9705051v2 (1997). · DOI
  21. S. V. Babak and L. P. Grishchuk, Internat. J. Mod. Phys. D, 12, 1905 (2003); arXiv: gr-qc/0209006v2 (2002). · DOI
  22. I. V. Tyutin and E. S. Fradkin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 15, 331 (1972). · DOI
  23. P. G. O. Freund, A. Maheshwari, and E. Schonberg, Astrophys. J., 157, 857 (1969). · DOI · Paper page
  24. D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, Phys. Rev. D, 6, 3368 (1972). · DOI · Paper page
  25. W. Israel, Differential Forms in General Relativity (2nd ed.), Dublin Inst. Adv. Studies, Dublin (1979).
  26. P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Nucl. Phys. B, 60, 478 (1973). · DOI · Paper page
  27. P. Havas, “Energy-momentum tensors in special and general relativity,” in: Developments in General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Quantum Theory (F. I. Cooperstock, L. P. Horwitz, and J. Rosen, eds.), IOP, Bristol (1990), p. 131.
  28. E. Kretschmann, Ann. Phys. (8), 53, 575 (1917).
  29. M. Friedman, Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J. (1983).
  30. J. D. Norton, Erkenntnis, 42, 223 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  31. C. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, Freeman, San Francisco (1973).
  32. J. B. Pitts, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B. Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys., 37, 347 (2006); arXiv:gr-qc/0506102v4 (2005). · DOI
  33. D. Giulini, “Some remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence,” in: Approaches to Fundamental Physics: An Assessment of Current Theoretical Ideas (Lect. Notes Phys., Vol. 721, E. Seiler and I.-O. Stamatescue, eds.), Springer, New York (2007); arXiv:gr-qc/0603087 (2006). · arXiv
  34. P. Bergmann, “Topics in the theory of general relativity,” in: Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Benjamin, New York (1957); R. U. Sexl, Fortschr. Phys., 15, 269 (1967); J. Stachel, “The meaning of general covariance: The hole story,” in: Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds (J. Earman, A. I. Janis, G. J. Massey, and N. Rescher, eds.), Univ. Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1993), p. 129.
  35. M. J. Gotay and J. E. Marsden, “Stress-energy-momentum tensors and the Belinfante-Rosenfeld formula,” in: Mathematical Aspects of Classical Field Theory (Contemp. Math., Vol. 132, M. J. Gotay, J. E. Marsden, and V. Moncrief, eds.), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R. I. (1992), p. 367; http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~gotay/SEMTensors.pdf. · DOI · Paper page
  36. V. I. Ogievetskii and I. V. Polubarinov, Sov. Phys. JETP, 21, 1093 (1965); R. F. Bilyalov, Russ. Math., 46, No. 11, 6 (2002).
  37. L. Rosenfeld, Acad. Roy. Belgique, Cl. Sci. Mém., 18, No. 6, 1 (1940).
  38. N. Rosen, “Flat space and variational principle,” in: Perspectives in Geometry and Relativity (B. Hoffmann, ed.), Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington (1966), p. 325; Gen. Relativity Gravitation, 4, 435 (1973); R. D. Sorkin, Modern Phys. Lett. A, 17, 695 (2002); http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000565/.
  39. R. M. Wald, General Relativity, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago (1984). · DOI · Paper page
  40. E. R. Huggins, “Quantum mechanics of the interaction of gravity with electrons: Theory of a spin-two field coupled to energy,” Doctoral dissertation, Calif. Inst. Tech., Pasadena, Calif. (1962).
  41. A. N. Petrov and J. Katz, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 458, 319 (2002); arXiv:gr-qc/9911025v3 (1999). · DOI
  42. M. G. Hare, Can. J. Phys., 51, 431 (1973); A. S. Goldhaber and M. M. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D, 9, 1119 (1974); L. S. Finn and P. J. Sutton, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 044022 (2002); arXiv:gr-qc/0109049v2 (2001). · DOI
  43. S. Deser, “Bimetric gravity revisited,” in: Developments in General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Quantum Theory (F. I. Cooperstock, L. P. Horwitz, and J. Rosen, eds.), IOP, Bristol (1990), p. 77.
  44. V. I. Zakharov, JETP Letters, 12, 312 (1970); H. van Dam and M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B, 22, 397 (1970); Gen. Relativity Gravitation, 3, 215 (1972); M. Carrera and D. Giulini, “Classical analysis of the van Dam-Veltman discontinuity,” arXiv:gr-qc/0107058v2 (2001). · arXiv
  45. Yu. M. Loskutov, Theor. Math. Phys., 107, 686 (1996). · DOI
  46. K. Sundermeyer, Constrained Dynamics: With Applications to Yang-Mills Theory, General Relativity, Classical Spin, Dual String Model (Lect. Notes Phys., Vol. 169), Springer, Berlin (1982).
  47. J. B. Pitts, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 33, 279 (2006); arXiv:hep-th/0601185v2 (2006). · DOI
  48. A. Anderson and J. W. York Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 1154 (1998); arXiv:gr-qc/9807041v1 (1998). · DOI
  49. S. S. Gershtein, A. A. Logunov, and M. A. Mestvirishvili, “On one fundamental property of gravitational field in the field theory,” arXiv:gr-qc/0412122v5 (2004). · DOI
  50. G. Velo and D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rev., 186, 1337 (1969). · DOI · Paper page
  51. I. Schmelzer, “General ether theorie and graviton mass,” arXiv:gr-qc/9811073v1 (1998). · arXiv
  52. Yu. V. Chugreev, Theor. Math. Phys., 138, 293 (2004). · DOI
  53. N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Georgi, and M. D. Schwartz, Ann. Phys., 305, 96 (2003); arXiv:hep-th/0210184v2 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  54. R. Delbourgo and A. Salam, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 12, 297 (1975); S. Hamamoto, Progr. Theoret. Phys., 95, 441 (1996); 97, 141 (1997); M. J. Du., J. T. Liu, and H. Sati, Phys. Lett. B, 516, 156 (2001); arXiv:hep-th/0105008v1 (2001); F. A. Dilkes, M. J. Du., J. T. Liu, and H. Sati, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 041301 (2001); arXiv:hep-th/0102093v3 (2001). · DOI
  55. I. A. Batalin, and I. V. Tyutin, Internat. J. Mod. Phys. A, 6, 3255 (1991). · DOI
  56. A. S. Vytheeswaran, Internat. J. Mod. Phys. A, 13, 765 (1998); arXiv:hep-th/9701050v2 (1997). · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pitts, J. B., & Schieve, W. C.
Venue
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-05
Volume
151
Issue
2
Pages
700-717
ISSN
  • 0040-5779
  • 1573-9333
DOI
10.1007/s11232-007-0055-7
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.