Cited by 21Plant tissue culture and regenerationLight effects on plantsFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

Embryogenesis efficiency and genetic stability of Dianthus caryophyllus embryos in response to different light spectra and plant growth regulators

Open access
Aalifar, Mostafa, Arab, Mostafa, Aliniaeifard, Sasan, Dianati, Shirin, Zare Mehrjerdi, Mahboobeh, Limpens, Erik, Serek, Margrethe·2019·Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11240-019-01684-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both quantity and quality of light are determinant factors for growth, regeneration and adaptation in tissues growing in vitro.

    “Both quantity and quality of light are determinant factors for growth, regeneration and adaptation in tissues growing in vitro (Aalifar et al., 2019).”

    From Growth, photosynthetic function, and stomatal characteristics of Persian walnut explants in vitro under different light spectra (2023) · cites this paper as Aalifar et al., 2019

    The indexed passages contain the paper’s title, keywords and bibliographic metadata, but no substantive passage addressing whether both light quantity and quality determine in-vitro growth, regeneration and adaptation. Searches for the claim’s wording and for light intensity, light quality and in-vitro growth found no passage that settles it. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aalifar, M., Arab, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Dianati, S., Zare Mehrjerdi, M., Limpens, E., & Serek, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Arab, Mostafa
  • Aliniaeifard, Sasan
Venue
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)
Published
2019-10-03
Volume
139
Issue
3
Pages
479-492
ISSN
  • 0167-6857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5044
OpenAlex
W2978898587
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Tehran
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
carnation, somatic embryogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, light spectrum, blue light, plant growth regulators, 2,4-D, picloram, benzyladenine, genetic stability, somaclonal variation, ISSR markers, nuclear DNA content, ploidy, micropropagation, embryo maturation, embryo germination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review