Growth, photosynthetic function, and stomatal characteristics of Persian walnut explants in vitro under different light spectra
Open accessAbstract
Light plays a crucial role in photosynthesis, which is an essential process for plantlets produced during in vitro tissue culture practices and ex vitro acclimatization. LED lights are an appropriate technology for in vitro lighting but their effect on propagation and photosynthesis under in vitro condition is not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the impact of different light spectra on growth, photosynthetic functionality, and stomatal characteristics of micropropagated shoots of Persian walnut (cv. Chandler). Tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots were grown under different light qualities including white, blue, red, far-red, green, combination of red and blue (70:30), combination of red and far-red (70:30), and fluorescent light as the control. Results showed that the best growth and vegetative characteristics of in vitro explants of Persian walnut were achieved under combination of red and blue light. The biggest size of stomata was detected under white and blue lights. Red light stimulated stomatal closure, while stomatal opening was induced under blue and white lights. Although the red and far-red light spectra resulted in the formation of elongated explants with more lateral shoots and anthocyanin content, they significantly reduced the photosynthetic functionality. Highest soluble carbohydrate content and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II were detected in explants grown under blue and white light spectra. In conclusion, growing walnut explants under combination of red and blue lights leads to better growth, photosynthesis functionality, and the emergence of functional stomata in in vitro explants of Persian walnuts.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In vitro Persian walnut (cv. Chandler) nodal shoots grown under different LED spectra showed that a red+blue combination gave the best overall growth, carotenoid content, and stomatal/photosynthetic functionality. Red and far-red spectra promoted elongation, lateral shoots, anthocyanin, and callus but reduced photosynthetic performance and stomatal aperture.
Key findings
- Red+blue LED spectra produced the best vegetative growth: largest leaf area (38.15 cm²), most leaflets (127.33), and increased leaf area >3×, leaflet number ~2×, leaf fresh weight >2×, and leaf dry weight >4× versus fluorescent control. Shoot thickness was also highest under red+blue (2.99 mm), 35.9% greater than control.
- Red+far-red spectra gave the highest stem length (107.22 mm) and increased stem height by 45.188%, stem fresh weight by 283.61%, and stem dry weight by 179.16% versus fluorescent light. Monochromatic red gave the most lateral shoots (2.66, +166% vs control) and longest internodes (9.91 mm vs 1.53 mm under white). Far-red alone strongly suppressed growth and increased callus weight to 1.84 g versus 0.48 g under fluorescent light (+283.33%).
- Pigment responses differed by spectrum: green and fluorescent light gave higher chlorophyll, red+blue gave the highest carotenoids (+47.82% vs control), and red+far-red gave the highest anthocyanin (+78.94% vs control). Far-red reduced total chlorophyll by 95.1% and carotenoids by 94.34% versus control.
- Blue-containing spectra maintained photosynthetic function: highest Fv/Fm occurred under white, blue, red+blue, fluorescent, and green LEDs, while red and far-red decreased Fv/Fm by 16.25% versus fluorescent light. White and blue LEDs produced the largest stomata; white LED increased stomatal density by 28.88% versus fluorescent light, while far-red gave the lowest density.
Methods
- Completely randomized design with 8 light treatments and six replications (two explants per replication): red (660 nm), green (530 nm), red+blue (70:30), white (400–700 nm), blue (460 nm), red+far-red (70:30), fluorescent control (380–750 nm), and far-red (730 nm), all at 80 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹ under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod for 28 days.
- Micropropagated Persian walnut (cv. Chandler) nodal shoots were grown in DKW medium with 1 mg L⁻¹ BA, 0.01 mg L⁻¹ IBA, 30 g L⁻¹ sucrose, and 7 g L⁻¹ carrageenan; growth, stomatal, pigment, carbohydrate, and chlorophyll fluorescence traits were measured.
- Data were analyzed by ANOVA using SAS 9.4 with Duncan’s multiple range test at P ≤ 0.05; stomatal morphology was evaluated with GraphPad Prism7, and paired t-tests were used for stomatal characteristics.
Limitations
- Stated limitations: Not stated in the paper.
- Evident from text: the study is limited to in vitro proliferation-stage explants of a single cultivar (Chandler) and does not report ex vitro acclimatization, survival, or greenhouse/field performance.
- Evident from text: light intensity was fixed at 80 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹ and treatments ran for 28 days, so no dose–response or longer-term persistence of stomatal/photo synthetic effects is tested.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
16 of 25 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Tissue-cultured plants may look normal in vitro but are unlikely to be actively photosynthesizing.
“Although tissue-cultured plants may look normal in vitro, they are unlikely to be actively photosynthesizing (Askari et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Askari et al., 2022 source
The Discussion directly contradicts the claim about photosynthetic activity: it says photosynthesis inevitably occurs in illuminated, chlorophyllous tissue cultures, though at a reduced rate. The Introduction also describes photosynthesis as restrained, not absent. The supplied passages do not address whether the plants look normal. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Morphogenesis and its related aspects are mainly regulated by various photoreceptors that are activated by photons in the range of blue, red, and far-red light spectra.
“Morphogenesis and its related aspects are mainly regulated by various photoreceptors that are activated by photons in the range of blue, red, and far-red light spectra (Griffin and Toledo-Ortiz, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Griffin and Toledo-Ortiz, 2022 source
- Premisecitation
The use of fluorescent lights in production of tissue culture plants incurs significant costs associated with electricity consumption.
“The use of fluorescent lights in the production of tissue culture plants also incurs significant costs associated with electricity consumption (Kulus and Woźny, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kulus and Woźny, 2020 source
- Premisecitation
Water loss rate of tissue culture plants is significantly higher than that of adapted and greenhouse plants.
“On the other hand, their water loss rate is significantly higher than that of adapted and greenhouse plants (Joshi et al., 2006; Bertolino et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Joshi et al., 2006 source
Table 2 reports much greater water loss from leaves in the multiplication phase (93.44% over three hours) than from hardened plants (39.39%) or in vivo seedlings (15.23%). But rooting-phase leaves lost about as much water as hardened leaves, and the paper does not establish a statistically significant difference or identify a greenhouse-plant comparison. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bertolino et al., 2019 source
The Introduction explains how stomatal aperture affects water loss, but it does not compare tissue-culture plants with adapted or greenhouse plants. Searches for that comparison and for acclimatization found no passage reporting a significantly higher water-loss rate in tissue-culture plants. The cited paper's copy does not address the specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Improper development of the photosynthetic system and malfunctioning of stomata during in vitro culture may lead to a series of morphological and physiological disorders of plant tissue.
“Improper development of the photosynthetic system and malfunctioning of stomata during in vitro culture may lead to a series of morphological and physiological disorders of plant tissue (Urban et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Urban et al., 2017 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) links stomatal regulation to photosynthesis and plant growth, but does not address malfunctioning stomata or improper photosynthetic development during in vitro culture. A search for in vitro culture, tissue-culture abnormalities, and morphological or physiological disorders found no passage addressing the claimed consequences. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Both quantity and quality of light are determinant factors for growth, regeneration and adaptation in tissues growing in vitro.
“Both quantity and quality of light are determinant factors for growth, regeneration and adaptation in tissues growing in vitro (Aalifar et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Aalifar et al., 2019 source
The indexed passages contain the paper’s title, keywords and bibliographic metadata, but no substantive passage addressing whether both light quantity and quality determine in-vitro growth, regeneration and adaptation. Searches for the claim’s wording and for light intensity, light quality and in-vitro growth found no passage that settles it. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The morphology of the stomata was influenced by the far-red and red LED spectra in both monochromatic mode and their combination.
“The morphology of the stomata was influenced by the far-red and red LED spectra in both monochromatic mode and their combination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Length and width of callus were lowest in explants under fluorescent light.
“Furthermore, the length and width of the callus were the lowest in explants under fluorescent light”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Stomatal opening was induced under blue and white lights.
“Red light stimulated stomatal closure, while stomatal opening was induced under blue and white lights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Explants did not grow under far-red light treatment.
“Indeed, explants did not grow under far-red light treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Walnut tissue-cultured explants under combination of blue and red LEDs had largest number of leaflets (127.33).
“They also had the largest leaf area (38.15 cm2), number of leaflets (127.33), and fresh and dry weights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and blue LEDs increased fresh weight of leaves by more than two times compared to fluorescent control.
“Combination of red and blue LEDs in the growth chamber of in vitro explants of Persian walnut increased the leaf area by more than three times, the number of leaflets by almost two times, the fresh weight of leaves by more than two times, and the dry weight of leaves by more than four times compared to their corresponding values under the fluorescent light (control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Internode length increased more than four times under monochromatic red LED compared to fluorescent light.
“The internode length was increased more than four times under the monochromatic red LED spectra treatment compared to the fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and far-red LED and monochromatic red spectra induced the generation of smaller stomata compared to the stomata of explants under other light treatments.
“Combination of red and far-red LED and monochromatic red spectra induced the generation of smaller stomata compared to the stomata of explants under other light treatments (Figures 9B, D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Biggest size of stomata was detected under white and blue lights.
“The biggest size of stomata was detected under white and blue lights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Highest amount of callus was observed under far-red light (1.84 g).
“The highest amount of callus was observed under the far-red light (1.84 g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The chlorophyll content (chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll) of walnut explants under green LED and fluorescent light were higher than those under other light spectra.
“The chlorophyll content (chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll) of walnut explants under green LED and fluorescent light were higher than those under other light spectra.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Longest internode length (9.91 mm) was under monochromatic red LED.
“The longest and shortest lengths of the internode (9.91 and 1.53 mm) were detected under the monochromatic red LED and white LED spectra, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Fv/Fm in tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots (cv. Chandler) was significantly affected by different light treatments (P<0.0001).
“The Fv/Fm in tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots (cv. Chandler) was significantly affected by different light treatments (P<0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The length of the stomata increased by 6.659 μm in the white LED spectra treatment compared to the far-red LED spectra treatment.
“The length of the stomata increased by 6.659 µm in the white LED spectra treatment compared to the far-red LED spectra treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Red light stimulated stomatal closure.
“Red light stimulated stomatal closure, while stomatal opening was induced under blue and white lights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Explants grown under fluorescent lights had lowest callus weight (0.48 g) than other treatments.
“the explants that were grown under fluorescent lights had the lowest callus weight (0.48 g) than the callus weight under other treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under single-color far-red LED, stem fresh weight decreased by 21.84% compared to control.
“Under the single-color far-red LED, a decrease in stem length by 60.85%, stem fresh weight by 21.84% and stem dry weight by 70.83% in comparison with the control treatment was detected (Figures 3, 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Anthocyanin content was the highest in walnut in vitro-explants under red and far-red combination, which was 78.94% compared to the anthocyanin content of the control (fluorescent light).
“Anthocyanin content was the highest in walnut in vitro-explants under red and far-red combination, which was 78.94% compared to the anthocyanin content of the control (fluorescent light).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In the present experiment, as a result of using the combined red and far-red LED spectra, the amount of anthocyanin increased by 78.94% compared to the fluorescent light, which is consistent with the studies in which the red LED spectra increased anthocyanin (Lee et al., 2010; Bayat et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Red monochromatic light spectrum caused the highest number of lateral shoots in walnut explants (2.66 numbers).
“Red monochromatic light spectrum caused the highest number of lateral shoots in walnut explants (2.66 numbers).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Monochromatic far-red LED spectra reduced the stomatal length and pore length compared to the stomata of samples under other light treatments.
“Monochromatic far-red LED spectra reduced the stomatal length and pore length compared to the stomata of samples under other light treatments (Figures 9A, C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and blue LEDs increased number of leaflets by almost two times compared to fluorescent control.
“Combination of red and blue LEDs in the growth chamber of in vitro explants of Persian walnut increased the leaf area by more than three times, the number of leaflets by almost two times, the fresh weight of leaves by more than two times, and the dry weight of leaves by more than four times compared to their corresponding values under the fluorescent light (control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Maximum quantum yield of photosystem II was detected in explants grown under blue and white light spectra.
“Highest soluble carbohydrate content and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II were detected in explants grown under blue and white light spectra.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under single-color far-red LED, stem length decreased by 60.85% compared to control.
“Under the single-color far-red LED, a decrease in stem length by 60.85%, stem fresh weight by 21.84% and stem dry weight by 70.83% in comparison with the control treatment was detected (Figures 3, 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Tissue-cultured walnut leaves exposed to lights containing a blue spectrum in their overall spectra, including white, blue, red and blue, fluorescent together with green LEDs, showed the highest Fv/Fm value.
“Tissue-cultured walnut leaves exposed to those lights contained a blue spectrum in their overall spectra, including white, blue, red, and blue, fluorescent together with green LEDs showed the highest Fv/Fm value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and blue LEDs increased leaf area by more than three times compared to fluorescent control.
“Combination of red and blue LEDs in the growth chamber of in vitro explants of Persian walnut increased the leaf area by more than three times, the number of leaflets by almost two times, the fresh weight of leaves by more than two times, and the dry weight of leaves by more than four times compared to their corresponding values under the fluorescent light (control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under white LED, the pore length was 6.2, 8.2, 10.08 μm larger than the pore length of walnut explants exposed to red, a combination of red and far-red and Far-red monochromatic light LEDs.
“Under white LED, the pore length was 6.2, 8.2, 10.08 µm larger than the pore length of walnut explants exposed to red, a combination of red and far-red and Far-red monochromatic light LEDs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Far-red monochromatic LED reduced dry weight of leaf by 4.287% compared to control.
“Far-red monochromatic LED reduced the leaf area by 66.39%, the number of leaflets by 56.95%, the fresh weight of the leaf by 68.47% and the dry weight of the leaf by 4.287% in comparison with the explants in the control condition (Figures 3, 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and far-red LEDs increased plant height by 45.188% compared to fluorescent light control.
“The combination of red and far-red LEDs increased plant height by 45.188%, stem fresh weight by 283.61%, and stem dry weight by 179.16% compared to their corresponding values under the fluorescent light (control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Effect of light spectral treatments on all growth characteristics of in vitro Persian walnut explants was significant (P<0.0001).
“The effect of light spectral treatments on all growth characteristics of in vitro explants of Persian walnut (cv. Chandler) was significant (P<0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using far-red LED spectra increased callus weight by 283.33% compared to fluorescent light.
“As a result of using far-red LED spectra in the walnut tissue culture growth room, the callus weight increased by 283.33% compared to its corresponding value under the fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Far-red monochromatic LED reduced leaf area by 66.39% compared to control.
“Far-red monochromatic LED reduced the leaf area by 66.39%, the number of leaflets by 56.95%, the fresh weight of the leaf by 68.47% and the dry weight of the leaf by 4.287% in comparison with the explants in the control condition (Figures 3, 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Exposure to the white LED spectrum increased the stomatal width by 10.7 μm compared to the stomatal width of samples exposed to a red LED.
“Exposure to the white LED spectrum increased the stomatal width by 10.7 µm compared to the stomatal width of samples exposed to a red LED.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Stomatal size and pore dimensions in in vitro explants of Persian walnut 'Chandler' were considerably influenced by different light spectra (P<0.0001).
“Stomatal size and pore dimensions in in vitro explants of Persian walnut ‘Chandler’ were considerably influenced by different light spectra (P<0.0001) (Figure 8; Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Thickest shoot was observed in explants grown under combination of blue and red LED spectra (2.99 mm).
“The thickest shoot was observed in explants grown under the combination of blue and red LED spectra (2.99 mm)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Far-red monochromatic light spectrum had negative effects on stem length, shoot fresh and dry weights compared to other light spectra.
“Far-red monochromatic light spectrum had negative effects on the stem length, shoots fresh and dry weights compared to their corresponding values under other light spectra.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and far-red LEDs increased stem dry weight by 179.16% compared to fluorescent light control.
“The combination of red and far-red LEDs increased plant height by 45.188%, stem fresh weight by 283.61%, and stem dry weight by 179.16% compared to their corresponding values under the fluorescent light (control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lowest shoot thickness was observed under far-red LEDs (1.90 mm).
“the lowest shoot thickness was observed under the far-red LEDs (1.90 mm).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Far-red monochromatic LED reduced fresh weight of leaf by 68.47% compared to control.
“Far-red monochromatic LED reduced the leaf area by 66.39%, the number of leaflets by 56.95%, the fresh weight of the leaf by 68.47% and the dry weight of the leaf by 4.287% in comparison with the explants in the control condition (Figures 3, 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Walnut tissue-cultured explants under combination of blue and red LEDs had largest fresh and dry weights.
“They also had the largest leaf area (38.15 cm2), number of leaflets (127.33), and fresh and dry weights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Number of lateral shoots and internode length were influenced by light treatments (P<0.0001).
“The number of lateral shoots and internode length were influenced by the light treatments (P<0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Shoot thickness significantly differed among different LED light treatments (P<0.0001).
“Shoot thickness significantly differed among different LED light treatments (P<0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Walnut tissue-cultured explants under combination of blue and red LEDs had largest leaf area (38.15 cm2).
“They also had the largest leaf area (38.15 cm2), number of leaflets (127.33), and fresh and dry weights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of blue and red LED spectra increased shoot thickness by 35.9% compared to fluorescent light.
“The combination of blue and red LED spectra increased shoot thickness by 35.9% compared to the shoot thickness of walnut explants under fluorescent light”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and far-red LEDs increased stem fresh weight by 283.61% compared to fluorescent light control.
“The combination of red and far-red LEDs increased plant height by 45.188%, stem fresh weight by 283.61%, and stem dry weight by 179.16% compared to their corresponding values under the fluorescent light (control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of light spectra on the biochemical characteristics of Persian walnut in vitro explants was significant (P<0.0001).
“The effect of light spectra on the biochemical characteristics of Persian walnut in vitro explants was significant (P<0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Average number of lateral shoots under fluorescent light was only one.
“the average number of lateral shoots under the fluorescent light was only one.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Far-red monochromatic LED reduced number of leaflets by 56.95% compared to control.
“Far-red monochromatic LED reduced the leaf area by 66.39%, the number of leaflets by 56.95%, the fresh weight of the leaf by 68.47% and the dry weight of the leaf by 4.287% in comparison with the explants in the control condition (Figures 3, 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots did not produce lateral shoots under white LED.
“The tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots did not produce lateral shoots under white LED”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Carotenoid content was the highest in walnuts grown in vitro under a combination of blue and red LEDs, which was 47.82% higher than its content in the control treatment.
“Carotenoid content was the highest in walnuts grown in vitro under a combination of blue and red LEDs, which was 47.82% higher than its content in the control treatment.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In the present experiment, using the combined blue and red LED spectra on walnut tissue cultured samples, the highest amount of carotenoids was observed, which increased by 47.82% compared to the samples under fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Soluble carbohydrates were significantly reduced by exposure to far-red LED spectra.
“On the other hand, soluble carbohydrates were significantly reduced by exposure to far-red LED spectra (Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Under single-color far-red LED, stem dry weight decreased by 70.83% compared to control.
“Under the single-color far-red LED, a decrease in stem length by 60.85%, stem fresh weight by 21.84% and stem dry weight by 70.83% in comparison with the control treatment was detected (Figures 3, 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Red and far-red light spectra significantly reduced photosynthetic functionality.
“Although the red and far-red light spectra resulted in the formation of elongated explants with more lateral shoots and anthocyanin content, they significantly reduced the photosynthetic functionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the light treatments, explants exposed to the green LED had the highest F0, Fm, and Fv.
“Among the light treatments, explants exposed to the green LED had the highest F0, Fm, and Fv.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A high F0 indicates the lack of proper functioning of the photosystems and closure of reaction centers.
- Findingown data
Tissue cultured walnut micro-shoots under far-red LED treatment have the lowest carotenoid content, 94.34% lower than in the control treatment.
“Tissue cultured walnut micro-shoots under far-red LED treatment have the lowest carotenoid content, 94.34% lower than in the control treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The far-red LED treatment showed the lowest amount of total chlorophyll, which was 95.1% lower than their content in explants under fluorescent light.
“Instead, the far-red LED treatment showed the lowest amount of total chlorophyll, which was 95.1% lower than their content in explants under fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Combination of red and blue LEDs increased dry weight of leaves by more than four times compared to fluorescent control.
“Combination of red and blue LEDs in the growth chamber of in vitro explants of Persian walnut increased the leaf area by more than three times, the number of leaflets by almost two times, the fresh weight of leaves by more than two times, and the dry weight of leaves by more than four times compared to their corresponding values under the fluorescent light (control).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Shortest internode length (1.53 mm) was under white LED.
“The longest and shortest lengths of the internode (9.91 and 1.53 mm) were detected under the monochromatic red LED and white LED spectra, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Highest soluble carbohydrate content was detected in explants grown under blue and white light spectra.
“Highest soluble carbohydrate content and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II were detected in explants grown under blue and white light spectra.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The efficiency of photosynthetic quantum performance decreased under the red and far-red lights, by 16.25% compared to fluorescent light treatment.
“These results indicate a decrease in the efficiency of photosynthetic quantum performance under the red and far-red lights, which decreased by 16.25% compared to fluorescent light treatment (Figures 6, 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The energy content of different light spectra is absorbed by chlorophyll pigments, which directly affects the electron transport chain of the photosynthetic apparatus.
- Findingown data
The combination of red and far-red LED spectra reduced the width of the stomata by 9.65 μm compared to the stomatal width of samples grown under blue LED.
“The combination of red and far-red LED spectra reduced the width of the stomata by 9.65 µm compared to the stomatal width of samples grown under blue LED.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The lowest F0, Fm, and Fv intensity were detected in explants exposed to far-red light.
“The lowest F0, Fm, and Fv intensity were detected in explants exposed to far-red light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The light spectra significantly influenced all photosynthetic pigments in Persian walnut in vitro explants.
“The light spectra significantly influenced all photosynthetic pigments (Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Light spectra treatments significantly affected all morphological characteristics of in vitro Persian walnut explants (P<0.0001).
“The effect of light spectra treatments on all morphological characteristics of in vitro explants of Persian walnut was significant (P<0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Number of lateral shoots in red light-exposed samples increased by 166% compared to fluorescent light.
“the number of lateral shoots in red light-exposed samples increased by 166% compared to their number in samples exposed to fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Monochromatic red light restricted leaf emergence and area.
“On the other hand, monochromatic red light restricted leaf emergence and area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Chlorophyll pigments, carotenoids, and anthocyanins significantly decreased with the in vitro growth of walnut under far-red light.
“The chlorophyll pigments, carotenoids, and anthocyanins significantly decreased with the in vitro growth of walnut under far-red light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The emission of chlorophyll fluorescence (photosynthesis biophysics) of in vitro explants of Persian walnut 'Chandler' was significantly influenced (P<0.0001) by a light spectrum of the in vitro environment.
“The emission of chlorophyll fluorescence (photosynthesis biophysics) of in vitro explants of Persian walnut ‘Chandler’ was significantly influenced (P<0.0001) by a light spectrum of the in vitro environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The energy content of different light spectra is absorbed by chlorophyll pigments, which directly affects the electron transport chain of the photosynthetic apparatus.
- Findingown data
The stomatal length and width and pore length and width in walnut tissue-cultured explants grown under white and blue LED spectra were more significant than other light treatments.
“The stomatal length and width and pore length and width in walnut tissue-cultured explants grown under white and blue LED spectra were more significant than other light treatments (Figure 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The number of lateral shoots (proliferation rate) under the red LED spectra increased by 166% compared to the fluorescent light.
“The number of lateral shoots (proliferation rate) under the red LED spectra increased by 166% compared to the fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In the present experiment, lighting environment containing red light alone or with far-red downregulated the photosynthesis functionality.
“In the present experiment, lighting environment containing red light alone or with far-red downregulated the photosynthesis functionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LED spectra in tissue cultured walnut micro-shoots significantly affected leaf area, number of leaves, and fresh and dry weight of leaves.
“LED spectra in tissue cultured walnut micro-shoots significantly affected leaf area, number of leaves, and fresh and dry weight of leaves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In the present study, the light spectra significantly affect the length of the generated shoots.
“In the present study, the light spectra significantly affect the length of the generated shoots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using the white LED spectra in the tissue-cultured growth rooms increased the stomatal density by 28.88% compared to the fluorescent light.
“Using the white LED spectra in the tissue-cultured growth rooms increased the stomatal density by 28.88% compared to the fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant difference was observed between blue and red combination LED spectra and fluorescent light in stomatal density.
“However, no significant difference was observed between blue and red combination LED spectra and fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Combining blue and red LED spectra and blue LED alone on tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots increased the shoot thickness by 35.9% compared to the fluorescent light.
“In the present study, combining blue and red LED spectra and blue LED alone on tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots increased the shoot thickness by 35.9% compared to the fluorescent light, consistent with the results obtained in Gossypium hirsutum (Li et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
In the present experiment, monochromatic red and far-red light and their combination (for example, the absence of blue light) led to the generation of small stomata with narrow apertures.
“In the present experiment, monochromatic red and far-red light and their combination (for example, the absence of blue light) led to the generation of small stomata with narrow apertures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Both blue and red light spectra can induce the opening of the stomata, but the role of red light in the beginning of the stomata is indirect.
- Findingown data
Light spectra treatments with increased percentages of blue light, i.e., blue and white light, induced generation of large stomata with wide apertures.
“Instead, light spectra treatments with increased percentages of blue light, i.e., blue and white light, induced generation of large stomata with wide apertures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Both blue and red light spectra can induce the opening of the stomata, but the role of red light in the beginning of the stomata is indirect.
- Findingown data
In our experiment, the highest amount of leaf fresh and dry weight was observed in explants grown under combined of blue and red LED spectra.
“In our experiment, according to the results obtained from the treatments of different light spectra in tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots, the highest amount of leaf fresh and dry weight was observed in explants grown under combined of blue and red LED spectra.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the current experiment, the combination of blue and red spectra increased the leaf area and the number of leaves and leaflets compared to other light treatments.
“In the current experiment, the combination of blue and red spectra increased the leaf area and the number of leaves and leaflets compared to other light treatments (Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
When walnut in vitro-explants were grown under red and far-red light spectra and monochromatic red-light spectrum, a significant increase in stem height and internode length was observed.
“When walnut in vitro-explants were grown under red and far-red light spectra and monochromatic red-light spectrum, a significant increase in stem height and internode length was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A combination of red and far-red spectra serves as an environmental cue for inducing anthocyanin production in the leaves of Persian walnut in-vitro explants.
“The findings indicate that a combination of red and far-red spectra serves as an environmental cue for inducing anthocyanin production in the leaves of Persian walnut in-vitro explants (Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The stomata of tissue-cultured plants are abnormal with wide openings and malfunctioning to close completely in response to external closing factors.
“Meanwhile, the stomata of tissue-cultured plants are abnormal with wide openings and malfunctioning to close completely in response to external closing factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fabbri et al., 1986 source
- Interpretationown data
Best growth and vegetative characteristics of in vitro explants of Persian walnut were achieved under combination of red and blue light.
“Results showed that the best growth and vegetative characteristics of in vitro explants of Persian walnut were achieved under combination of red and blue light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Different light spectra could influence the photosynthetic performance of tissue-cultured explants.
- Rests on an assumption: Photosynthesis is directly affected by the light spectrum.
- Rests on an assumption: Photosynthesis provides the carbohydrates needed for plant growth.
- Interpretationreasoning
These results indicate that GA signaling in walnut in vitro-explants is required for red and far-red light-induced shoot elongation.
“These results indicate that GA signaling in walnut in vitro-explants is required for red and far-red light-induced shoot elongation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Elongation by far-red light is due to the activation of shade avoidance response by far-red light and suppression of this process by blue light.
- Rests on an assumption: Red light spectrum induces the levels of plant growth regulators, especially endogenous gibberellins, which play an essential role in cell elongation by stimulating mitosis in the apical and subapical meristem, which can lead to long stems and reduced diameter of the explants.
- Premisecitation
GA turnover is higher in tissues exposed to far-red light.
“GA turnover is higher in tissues exposed to far-red light (Beall et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beall et al., 1996 source
- Interpretationown data
Red LED positively affects the formation of lateral shoots in tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots.
“This shows that red LED positively affects the formation of lateral shoots in tissue-cultured walnut nodal shoots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The increase in internode length under the red and far-red spectra is due to increased cell length and cell division.
“The increase in internode length under the red and far-red spectra is due to increased cell length and cell division.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Elongation by far-red light is due to the activation of shade avoidance response by far-red light and suppression of this process by blue light.
- Rests on an assumption: Red light spectrum induces the levels of plant growth regulators, especially endogenous gibberellins, which play an essential role in cell elongation by stimulating mitosis in the apical and subapical meristem, which can lead to long stems and reduced diameter of the explants.
- May combine two claims. 28
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFluorescent lights have limited possibilities to control and adjust intensity and composition of light spectra, and these parameters are not stable and change during growth of tissue culture plants.
“They have limited possibilities to control and adjust the intensity and composition of the light spectra, and these parameters are not stable and change during the growth of tissue culture plants (Darko et al., 2014; Bantis et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Darko et al., 2014 source
Section 2 (page unavailable) says the spectrum and intensity of fluorescent lights are not stable over a long time. It contrasts fluorescent lighting with LEDs’ spectral flexibility and ease of control, but does not directly state that fluorescent lights have limited adjustment options or that their parameters change specifically during the growth of tissue-culture plants. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bantis et al., 2016 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLEDs allow manipulation of the light's quality suitable for plants' needs.
“LEDs allow manipulation of the light’s quality suitable for plants’ needs (Trivellini et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Trivellini et al., 2023 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationSampling for stomatal morphology was done 3 h after the start of the light period because this time is adequate for plants to open stomata and reach a steady-state stomatal conductance.
“Sampling was done 3 h after the start of the light period in the Phytotron, simultaneously under different light spectra, because this time is adequate for plants following experiencing the dark period to open stomata and reach a steady-state stomatal conductance (Seif et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Seif et al., 2021 source
The available Abstract (page not specified) says the study evaluated stomatal anatomy and closing ability, but it gives no sampling time or reason for choosing one. Searches for three hours after light onset, stomatal conductance, and steady state returned no passage addressing whether stomata had opened after the dark period. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTissue culture plants have round and open stomata with higher stomatal density and index compared to adapted greenhouse plants.
“Tissue culture plants have round and open stomata with higher stomatal density and index compared to adapted greenhouse plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Joshi et al., 2006 source
The paper’s results (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) describe round, wide-open stomata in in vitro Wrightia tomentosa plants and higher stomatal frequency than in vivo plants; it also identifies greenhouse-raised seedlings among its controls. It does not report a higher stomatal index: the methods list frequency, closure, and malformation, but not index. The round shape is described specifically for multiplication-phase cultures, not all tissue-culture plants. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bertolino et al., 2019 source
The Introduction discusses variation in stomatal shape, density, and index, but does not compare tissue-culture plants with greenhouse-adapted plants. Searches for tissue culture, greenhouse adaptation, and the claimed stomatal differences found no passage addressing that comparison; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicropropagation of all species of Juglans genus is very difficult, but it is widely used for mass propagation of Persian walnuts.
“Micropropagation of all species of Juglans genus is very difficult, but it is widely used for the mass propagation of Persian walnuts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Julian et al., 2020 source
The Abstract (page not given) describes recalcitrance and rooting difficulties for a particular walnut hybrid, supporting the claim that micropropagation can be difficult. It does not extend that difficulty to all Juglans species or say that micropropagation is widely used for mass propagation of Persian walnuts; the References list work on Juglans regia but do not establish widespread use. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompared to conventional systems, LED lighting systems have unique advantages such as durability, small size, long operating lifetime, relatively cool emitting surface, a linear photon output with the electrical input current, and the ability to control spectral composition.
“Compared to conventional systems, LED lighting systems have unique advantages such as durability, small size, long operating lifetime, relatively cool emitting surface, a linear photon output with the electrical input current, and the ability to control spectral composition (Brown et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al., 1995 source
The introductory passage describes LEDs as small, solid-state devices with long lives; the Discussion describes their low heat load and easily manipulated spectral output. The paper does not state that photon output varies linearly with electrical input current, and low heat load on plants does not establish that the emitting surface is cool. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationChlorophyll extraction took place in a dark room because chlorophyll is light sensitive.
“Since chlorophyll is light sensitive, extraction took place in a dark room (Bergsträsser et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bergsträsser et al., 2015 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen producing Persian walnut in vitro explants, it is crucial to undergo hardening and acclimatization processes due to dysfunctional stomata of walnut in vitro-plantlets, resulting in excessive transpiration and heightened sensitivity to environments with increased evaporative demands and solar radiation.
“When producing Persian walnut in vitro explants, it is crucial to undergo hardening and acclimatization processes. This is due to the dysfunctional stomata of walnut in vitro-plantlets, resulting in excessive transpiration and heightened sensitivity to environments with increased evaporative demands and solar radiation (Chandra et al., 2010; Rathore et al., 2013; Manokari and Shekhawat, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Chandra et al., 2010 source
- cites Rathore et al., 2013 source
- cites Manokari and Shekhawat, 2017 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: Plants are heterotrophic or mixotrophic under in vitro conditions, and their photosynthetic activity is limited because the carbon source is provided in the form of sugar.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest concentrations of soluble carbohydrates were detected in explants of Persian walnut grown in vitro under a monochromatic blue light spectrum, as well as the combination of red-light spectra with blue and far-red.
“The highest concentrations of soluble carbohydrates were detected in explants of Persian walnut grown in vitro under a monochromatic blue light spectrum, as well as the combination of red-light spectra with blue and far-red.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In the present experiment, the highest amount of soluble carbohydrates was observed in walnut in vitro-explants grown under the treatment of blue LED spectra, red and far-red and red and blue light combinations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The ratio of red and blue LED spectra can affect biochemical compounds, such as soluble carbohydrate, starch and amino acids.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRed and far-red light spectra resulted in formation of elongated explants with more lateral shoots and anthocyanin content.
“Although the red and far-red light spectra resulted in the formation of elongated explants with more lateral shoots and anthocyanin content, they significantly reduced the photosynthetic functionality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pore width was reduced by 3.5 μm in the red LED spectra and 3.57 μm in the combined red and far-red LED spectra, compared to the blue and red combined LED spectra.
“The pore width was reduced by 3.5 µm in the red LED spectra and 3.57 µm in the combined red and far-red LED spectra, compared to the blue and red combined LED spectra.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWalnut tissue-cultured explants under combination of blue and red LEDs showed most expansive leaf area and highest number of leaves than other light treatments.
“Walnut tissue-cultured explants under a combination of blue and red LEDs showed the most expansive leaf area and the highest number of leaves than the explants under other light treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest stem length (107.22 mm) and highest shoot fresh and dry weights were recorded in samples exposed to a combination of red and far-red spectra.
“The highest stem length (107.22 mm) and the highest values of shoot fresh and dry weights were recorded in samples exposed to a combination of red and far-red spectra.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLargest callus width was observed in explants grown under far-red light treatment, increased by 78% compared to fluorescent light.
“The largest callus width was also observed in the explants grown under far-red light treatment, which was increased by 78% compared to the fluorescent light.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pore width increased by 8.803 μm under the green LED, 10.24 μm under the white LED, and 6.299 μm under the fluorescent light, compared to the pore width of the combination of red and far-red LEDs.
“The pore width increased by 8.803 µm under the green LED, 10.24 µm under the white LED, and 6.299 µm under the fluorescent light, compared to the pore width of the combination of red and far-red LEDs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExplants treated with white LED spectra had the highest stomatal density, and those treated with far-red LED spectra had the lowest stomatal density.
“Explants treated with white LED spectra had the highest stomatal density, and those treated with far-red LED spectra had the lowest stomatal density.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In the present study, the growth of in vitro explants of Persian walnut under white LED spectra treatment resulted in the highest stomatal density compared to other light treatments, which is consistent with other studies in which white LED spectra increased stomatal density (do Nascimento Vieira et al., 2015; Seif et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn the conditions where both blue and red lights were used, the growth of explants increased, and the red and blue LED spectra in different combinations improved the growth of leaves (number of leaves, leaf area, and leaf length).
“In the conditions where both blue and red lights were used, the growth of explants increased, and the red and blue LED spectra in different combinations improved the growth of leaves (number of leaves, leaf area, and leaf length).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRed LED, a combination of red and far-red, green and far-red decreased stomatal density.
“However, red LED, a combination of red and far-red, green and far-red decreased stomatal density.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest amount of F0 was detected in the samples exposed to green LED lights, which increased by 174.08% compared to the fluorescent treatment.
“The high F0 indicates the lack of proper functioning of the photosystems and closure of reaction centers, the highest amount of F0 was detected in the samples exposed to green LED lights, which increased by 174.08% compared to the fluorescent treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A high F0 indicates the lack of proper functioning of the photosystems and closure of reaction centers.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhotosynthetic performance of walnut explants was maintained by blue light and downregulated by red light in the present study.
“Photosynthetic performance of walnut explants maintained by blue light and downregulated by red light in the present study.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“Additionally, red light downregulated the photosynthetic functionality of the walnut tissue cultured samples, while blue light maintained it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The energy content of different light spectra is absorbed by chlorophyll pigments, which directly affects the electron transport chain of the photosynthetic apparatus.
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe largest and smallest sizes of stomata were detected under blue-containing and red-containing spectra, respectively, while the combination of blue and red LEDs resulted in intermediate sizes of stomata.
“The largest and smallest sizes of stomata were detected under blue-containing and red-containing spectra, respectively, while the combination of blue and red LEDs resulted in intermediate sizes of stomata.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Both blue and red light spectra can induce the opening of the stomata, but the role of red light in the beginning of the stomata is indirect.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenLight intensity for eight light treatments was determined using a PAR-FluorPen device and was considered similarly for all treatments.
“Light intensity for eight light treatments was determined using a PAR-FluorPen device (FP 100-MAX, Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech Republic) and was considered similarly for all treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFor stomatal characteristics, data obtained from one leaf was considered not independent, and paired t-test was used to find significant differences.
“For stomatal characteristics, data obtained from one leaf was considered not independent, and paired t-test was used to find significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPlantlet adaptation is considered as a challenging stage in walnut micropropagation.
“However, plantlet adaptation is considered as a challenging stage in walnut micropropagation (Litz et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Litz et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGrowing walnut explants under combination of red and blue lights leads to better growth, photosynthesis functionality, and emergence of functional stomata in in vitro explants of Persian walnuts.
“In conclusion, growing walnut explants under combination of red and blue lights leads to better growth, photosynthesis functionality, and the emergence of functional stomata in in vitro explants of Persian walnuts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Different light spectra would alter stomatal morphology in vitro.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Different light spectra could influence the photosynthetic performance of tissue-cultured explants.
- Rests on an assumption: Photosynthesis is directly affected by the light spectrum.
- Rests on an assumption: Photosynthesis provides the carbohydrates needed for plant growth.
- Rests on an assumption: The light spectrum strongly influences the stomata and its reactions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe experiment used a completely randomized design with 8 treatments and six replications (two explants per replication).
“To investigate the effect of different spectra of light on in vitro explants of Persian walnut, an experiment in a completely randomized design with 8 treatments and six replications (two explants per replication) was designed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRed light is usually increasing stem height and internode length and rooting, but blue light is generally needed for the synthesis of chlorophyll and the development of stomata and leaf area expansion.
“Red light is usually increasing stem height and inter node length and rooting, but blue light is generally needed for the synthesis of chlorophyll and the development of stomata and leaf area expansion (Poudel et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Poudel et al., 2008 source
- cites Li et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe growth and development of Persian walnut 'Chandler' explants in vitro can be affected by different light spectra, which also have an impact on their photosynthetic functionality and stomatal characteristics.
“The growth and development of Persian walnut ‘Chandler’ explants in vitro can be affected by different light spectra, which also have an impact on their photosynthetic functionality and stomatal characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe combination of blue and red LED spectra proved to be particularly beneficial for the growth and vegetative characteristics of walnut explants in vitro, as well as for the production of carotenoids.
“The combination of blue and red LED spectra proved to be particularly beneficial for the growth and vegetative characteristics of walnut explants in vitro, as well as for the production of carotenoids.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhite and blue light spectra improve the efficiency of light energy conversion and increases energy accumulation for carbon absorption in carbon reactions.
“Therefore, white and blue light spectra improve the efficiency of light energy conversion and increases energy accumulation for carbon absorption in carbon reactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Different light spectra would alter stomatal morphology in vitro.
“it was assumed that different light spectra would alter stomatal morphology in vitro.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Different light spectra could influence the photosynthetic performance of tissue-cultured explants.
“it was assumed that different light spectra could influence the photosynthetic performance of tissue-cultured explants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Photosynthesis is directly affected by the light spectrum.
“Photosynthesis is directly affected by the light spectrum”
The paper relies on this without support.
Photosynthesis provides the carbohydrates needed for plant growth.
“photosynthesis provides the carbohydrates needed for plant growth”
The paper relies on this without support.
The light spectrum strongly influences the stomata and its reactions.
“Because the light spectrum strongly influences the stomata and its reactions”
The paper relies on this without support.
The energy content of different light spectra is absorbed by chlorophyll pigments, which directly affects the electron transport chain of the photosynthetic apparatus.
“The energy content of different light spectra is absorbed by the chlorophyll pigments, which directly affects the electron transport chain of the photosynthetic apparatus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Plants are heterotrophic or mixotrophic under in vitro conditions, and their photosynthetic activity is limited because the carbon source is provided in the form of sugar.
“Plants are heterotrophic or mixotrophic under in vitro conditions, and their photosynthetic activity is limited (the carbon source is provided in the form of sugar).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Elongation by far-red light is due to the activation of shade avoidance response by far-red light and suppression of this process by blue light.
“Elongation by far-red light is due to the activation of shade avoidance response by far-red light and suppression of this process by blue light.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Red light spectrum induces the levels of plant growth regulators, especially endogenous gibberellins, which play an essential role in cell elongation by stimulating mitosis in the apical and subapical meristem, which can lead to long stems and reduced diameter of the explants.
“Red light spectrum induces the levels of plant growth regulators, especially endogenous gibberellins, which play an essential role in cell elongation by stimulating mitosis in the apical and subapical meristem, which can lead to long stems and reduced diameter of the explants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ratio of red and blue LED spectra can affect biochemical compounds, such as soluble carbohydrate, starch and amino acids.
“the ratio of red and blue LED spectra can affect biochemical compounds, such as soluble carbohydrate, starch and amino acids.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Both blue and red light spectra can induce the opening of the stomata, but the role of red light in the beginning of the stomata is indirect.
“Both blue and red light spectra can induce the opening of the stomata, but the role of red light in the beginning of the stomata is indirect.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A high F0 indicates the lack of proper functioning of the photosystems and closure of reaction centers.
“The high F0 indicates the lack of proper functioning of the photosystems and closure of reaction centers”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reported stomatal P values do not support P<0.0001 for all dimensions
MinorThe results assign P<0.0001 to stomatal size and pore dimensions collectively, but Table 1 reports P values of 0.0196 for stomatal length and 0.0007 for both stomatal width and pore length.
“Stomatal size and pore dimensions in in vitro explants of Persian walnut ‘Chandler’ were considerably influenced by different light spectra (P<0.0001) (Figure 8; Table 1).”
“| P value | 0.0196 | 0.0007 | < 0.0001 | 0.0007 |”
The stated threshold for non-significance contradicts the analysis
MinorThe statistical methods call P ≤ 0.05 not significant, while Table 1 treats values below 0.05 as statistically significant.
“For stomata morphological, physiological, and vegetative traits, data were subjected to ANOVA, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered as not significant.”
“| Statistically significant (P < 0.05)? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |”
Stomatal measurements are assigned to opposite leaf surfaces
MinorThe methods place the stomatal analysis on the adaxial surface, whereas Figure 8 identifies the imaged stomata as being on the abaxial surface.
“The morphology of stomata was analyzed on the lower epidermis (adaxial surface)”
“Figure: Figure 8 Stomata on abaxial surface of in vitro walnut (cv. Chandler) leaves developed under different light spectral conditions.”
Light-treatment duration is reported as both 28 and 30 days
MinorThe lighting methods say explants were grown under the treatments for 28 days, but the growth measurements are described as occurring 30 days after treatment began.
“explants of walnuts were grown for 28 days under different light spectra treatments”
“At the end of the experiment, following removing the explant samples from the culture containers (30 days after application of light treatments)”
Cites
Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents
Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Wellburn, A. R. (1983) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0110591 · Cited by 6,813 · see citing works
Bj�rkman, O., & Demmig, B. (1987) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00402983 · Cited by 2,514 · see citing works
Determination of Starch and Amylose in Vegetables
McCready, R. M., Guggolz, J., Silviera, V., & OWENS, H. S. (1950) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60045a016 · Cited by 1,689 · see citing works
In Vitro Propagation of Paradox Walnut Rootstock
Driver, J. A., & Kuniyuki, A. H. (1984) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.19.4.507 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
The Role of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in The Detection of Stress Conditions in Plants
Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Rinderle, U. (1988) · C R C Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/15476510.1988.10401466 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
Lin, K.-H., Huang, M.-Y., Huang, W.-D., Hsu, M.-H., Yang, Z.-W., & Yang, C.-M. (2013) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.002 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Sucrose-Specific Induction of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis Requires the MYB75/PAP1 Gene
Teng, S., Keurentjes, J. J. B., Bentsink, L., Koornneef, M., & SMEEKENS, S. C. M. (2005) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.105.066688 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Johkan, M., Shoji, K., Goto, F., et al. (2010) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.45.12.1809 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture of plants
Hazarika, B. N. (2006) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.038 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Urban, J., Ingwers, M. W., McGuire, M. A., & Teskey, R. O. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx052 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Guidi, L., Piccolo, E. L., & Landi, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00174 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Acclimatization of Micropropagated Plants to Ex Vitro Conditions
Pospíšilová, J., Tichá, I., Kadleček, P., et al. (1999) · Biologia Plantarum · doi:10.1023/a:1002688208758 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Photosynthesis under artificial light: the shift in primary and secondary metabolism
Darko, E., Heydarizadeh, P., Schoefs, B., & Sabzalian, M. R. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0243 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Brown, C. S., Schuerger, A. C., & Sager, J. C. (1995) · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science · doi:10.21273/jashs.120.5.808 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Gupta, S. D., & Jatothu, B. (2013) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-013-0277-0 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Acclimatization of tissue cultured plantlets: from laboratory to land
Chandra, S., Bandopadhyay, R., Kumar, V., & Chandra, R. (2010) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/s10529-010-0290-0 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Muneer, S., Kim, E. Y., Park, J., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms15034657 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Effect of red-and blue-light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of grapes
Poudel, P. R., Kataoka, I., & Mochioka, R. (2008) · Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture · doi:10.1007/s11240-007-9317-1 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Cellular, Molecular, and Physiological Aspects of In Vitro Plant Regeneration
Bidabadi, S. S., & Jain, S. M. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9060702 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Li, H., Xu, Z., & Tang, C. (2010) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-010-9763-z · Cited by 261 · see citing works
The effect of light quality on the growth and development of in vitro cultured Doritaenopsis plants
Shin, K. S., Murthy, H. N., Heo, J.-W., et al. (2008) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-007-0128-0 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Co-ordination of hydraulic and stomatal conductances across light qualities in cucumber leaves
Savvides, A. M., Fanourakis, D., & van Ieperen, W. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err348 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Bergsträsser, S., Fanourakis, D., Schmittgen, S., Cendrero-Mateo, M., Jansen, M., Scharr, H., & Rascher, U. (2015) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0043-0 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Bantis, F., Ouzounis, T., & Radoglou, K. (2016) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.014 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Irradiance from Distinct Wavelength Light-emitting Diodes Affect Secondary Metabolites in Kale
Lefsrud, M. G., Kopsell, D. A., & Sams, C. E. (2008) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2243 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Xu, F., Cao, S., Shi, L., Chen, W., Su, X., & Yang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf501120u · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Lee, S.-H., Tewari, R. K., Hahn, E.-J., et al. (2007) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-006-9191-2 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Li, H., Tang, C., Xu, Z., et al. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.5539/jas.v4n4p262 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Bayat, L., Arab, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Seif, M., Lastochkina, O. V., & Li, T. (2018) · AoB Plants · doi:10.1093/aobpla/ply052 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationChlorophyll fluorescence yield changes as a tool in plant physiology I. The measuring system
Schreiber, U. (1983) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/bf00054144 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Litz (2020) · doi:10.1079/9781780648279.0000 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Far-red light: A regulator of plant morphology and photosynthetic capacity
Tan, T., Li, S., Fan, Y., et al. (2021) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2021.06.007 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Response of photosynthetic capacity of tomato leaves to different LED light wavelength
Yang, X., Xu, H., Shao, L., Li, T., Wang, Y., & Wang, R. (2018) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.03.013 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Li, Y., Xin, G., Liu, C., et al. (2020) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-020-02523-z · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Light and Plant Growth Regulators on In Vitro Proliferation
Cavallaro, V., Pellegrino, A., Muleo, R., & Forgione, I. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11070844 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Alvarenga, I. C. A., Pacheco, F. V., Silva, S. T., et al. (2015) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-015-0766-7 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
XiaoYing, L., Shi-rong, G., Zhigang, X., et al. (2011) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.46.2.217 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Water Relations of Cut Flowers: An Update
van Doorn, W. G. (2012) · Horticultural reviews · doi:10.1002/9781118351871.ch2 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Hung, C. D., Hong, C., Kim, S.-K., et al. (2016) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-016-2164-0 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Fanourakis, D., Heuvelink, E., & Carvalho, S. M. P. (2013) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.013 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Advances in Rootstock Breeding of Nut Trees: Objectives and Strategies
Vahdati, K., Sarikhani, S., Arab, M. M., et al. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10112234 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationHyperhydricity in Plant Tissue Culture
Polivanova, O. B., & Bedarev, V. A. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11233313 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Lin, Y., Li, J., Li, B., et al. (2010) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-010-9871-9 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Pospíšilová, J., Synková, H., Haisel, D., et al. (2007) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2007.748.2 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Ghorbanzadeh, P., Aliniaeifard, S., Esmaeili, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-020-10269-z · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationAgati, G., Guidi, L., Landi, M., & Tattini, M. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17648 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Xiaoying, L. (2012) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY · doi:10.5897/ajb11.1191 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Light Treatments to Improve Efficiency of in Vitro Propagation Systems
Economou, A. S., & Read, P. E. (1987) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.22.5.751 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Zhou, B. O., Sun, M., Li, Y., & Kawabata, S. (2012) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcs088 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana grown at high relative air humidity
Nejad, A. R., & Meeteren, U. V. (2005) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00567.x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll a fluorescence in two rubber tree clones
Falqueto, A. R., Júnior, R. A. D. S., Gomes, M. T. G., et al. (2017) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.019 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Seif, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Arab, M., Mehrjerdi, M. Z., Shomali, A., Fanourakis, D., Li, T., & Woltering, E. (2021) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp20280 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationNakatsuka, A., Yamagishi, M., Nakano, M., et al. (2009) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.01.008 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Ohtake, N., Ishikura, M., Suzuki, H., et al. (2018) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci13469-18 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Gago, J., Martínez-Núñez, L., Landín, M., Flexas, J., & Gallego, P. P. F. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085989 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Aalifar, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Arab, M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00511 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationAliniaeifard, S., & Meeteren, U. V. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru370 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationScheer, H. (2003) · Advances in photosynthesis and respiration · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2087-8_2 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Beall, F. D., Yeung, E. C., & Pharis, R. P. (1996) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b96-093 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Miler, N., Kulus, D., Woźny, A., et al. (2018) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-018-9939-5 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Olsen, R. L., Pratt, R. B., Gump, P., et al. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00337.x · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Guard Cell Chloroplasts Are Essential for Blue Light-Dependent Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis
Suetsugu, N., Takami, T., Ebisu, Y., Watanabe, H., Iiboshi, C., Doi, M., & Shimazaki, K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108374 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Sousaraei, N., Mashayekhi, K., Mousavizadeh, S. J., et al. (2021) · Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s13580-020-00328-5 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationKwon, A.-R., Cui, H.-Y., Lee, H., et al. (2015) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-015-1812-0 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
LED lighting to produce high-quality ornamental plants
Trivellini, A., Toscano, S., Romano, D., & Ferrante, A. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12081667 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Wu, H.-C., & Lin, C. (2012) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.47.10.1490 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Fabbri, A., Sutter, E., & Dunston, S. K. (1986) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/0304-4238(86)90107-x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Photosynthetic Membranes and Their Light-Harvesting Antennas
Green, B. R., Anderson, J. M., & Parson, W. W. (2003) · Advances in photosynthesis and respiration · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2087-8_1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Light quality affectsin Vitro growth of grape ‘Teleki 5BB’
Heo, J.-W., Shin, K. S., Kim, S., et al. (2006) · Journal of Plant Biology · doi:10.1007/bf03031155 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Ouzounis, T., Fretté, X. C., Ottosen, C., et al. (2014) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12300 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Spectral effects on embryogenesis and plantlet growth of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’
Chung, J.-P., Huang, C., & Dai, T.-E. (2010) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.028 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Vahdati, K., Leslie, C. A., Zamani, Z., et al. (2004) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.2.324 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationRamírez-Mosqueda, M. A., Iglesias-Andreu, L. G., & Bautista-Aguilar, J. R. (2016) · Sugar Tech · doi:10.1007/s12355-016-0459-5 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
New Insights into the Regulation of Stomatal Opening by Blue Light and Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase
Kinoshita, T., & Hayashi, Y. (2011) · International review of cytology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386039-2.00003-1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Guiamba, H. D. S. S., Zhang, X., Sierka, E. M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.918038 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Increasing the performance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings by LED illumination
Hamedalla, A. M., Ali, M. M., Ali, W. M., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-04859-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Ma, X., Wang, Y., Liu, M., et al. (2015) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.006 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Aalifar, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Arab, M., et al. (2020) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.03.018 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationAsayesh, Z. M., Vahdati, K., Aliniaeifard, S., & Askari, N. (2017) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.03.045 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationAsayesh, Z. M., Vahdati, K., & Aliniaeifard, S. (2017) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.04.023 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, J.-G., Oh, S., Cha, S.-H., et al. (2010) · Journal of Bio-Environment Control · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Yousef, A. F., Ali, M. M., Rizwan, H. M., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249373 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Vieira, L. D. N., Fraga, H. P. D. F., dos Anjos, K. G., et al. (2015) · Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40626-015-0035-5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Manivannan, A., Soundararajan, P., Park, Y. G., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.607007 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Light Intensity: The Role Player in Cucumber Response to Cold Stress
Ashrostaghi, T., Aliniaeifard, S., Shomali, A., et al. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12010201 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationKumar, K., & Rao, I. U. (2012) · Journal of ornamental and horticultural plants · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Al–Mayahi, A. M. W. (2016) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-016-2120-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Light-induced Synthesis of Anthocyanin in Carrot Cells in Suspension
Takeda, J. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/41.6.749 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Stomatal characteristics during micropropagation of Wrightia tomentosa
Joshi, P., Joshi, N., & Purohit, S. D. (2006) · Biologia plantarum · doi:10.1007/s10535-006-0019-z · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Griffin, J. H. C., & Toledo-Ortiz, G. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erac220 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Rathore, N. S., Rathore, N., & Shekhawat, N. S. (2013) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-013-1301-2 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Moosavi-Nezhad, M., Alibeigi, B., Estaji, A., et al. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11233337 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationAliniaeifard, S., Asayesh, Z. M., Driver, J. A., & Vahdati, K. (2020) · Trees · doi:10.1007/s00468-020-01992-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationProduction of Anthocyanins by Plant Cell and Tissue Culture Strategies
(2012) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/978160805114411201010067 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Stomatal and cuticular traits on carnation tissue culture under different ventilation conditions
Majada, J. P., Centeno, M. L., Feito, I., et al. (1998) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1023/b:grow.0000009706.70078.1c · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Vahdati, K., Asayesh, Z. M., Aliniaeifard, S., & Leslie, C. A. (2017) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci11922-17 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationAsayesh, E. J., Aliniaeifard, S., Askari, N., Roozban, M. R., Sobhani, M., Tsaniklidis, G., Woltering, E. J., & Fanourakis, D. (2021) · Horticulturae · doi:10.3390/horticulturae7110485 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, C., Gu, Q., Zhao, L., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.772644 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Guo, B., Liu, Y., Yan, Q., et al. (2007) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s10725-007-9192-0 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Aalifar, M., Arab, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Dianati, S., Zare Mehrjerdi, M., Limpens, E., & Serek, M. (2019) · Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-019-01684-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationRanwala, N. K. D., Decoteau, D. R., Ranwala, A. P., et al. (2002) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1023/a:1021272902811 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
LED Light Spectrum Affects the Photosynthetic Performance of Houttuynia Cordata Seedlings
Zhaoqing, W. (2015) · American Journal of Optics and Photonics · doi:10.11648/j.ajop.20150303.12 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Askari, N., Aliniaeifard, S., & Visser, R. G. F. (2022) · Horticulturae · doi:10.3390/horticulturae8010044 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationImproved control of water loss from micropropagated grapevines (Vitis vinifera cv. Nebbiolo)
Gribaudo, I., Novello, V., & Restagno, M. (2015) · Vitis · doi:10.5073/vitis.2001.40.137-140 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The effect of spectral light quality on in vitro culture of sugarcane
Silva, M. M. D. A., de Oliveira, A. L. B., Oliveira-Filho, R. A., et al. (2016) · Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences · doi:10.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i2.31109 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Kulus, D., & Woźny, A. (2020) · BioTechnologia · doi:10.5114/bta.2020.92930 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Chen, X., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Liu, J.-K., & Feng, L. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Short-Term Conservation of Juglans regia L. via Synthetic Seed Technology
Sota, V., Benelli, C., Myrselaj, M., et al. (2023) · Horticulturae · doi:10.3390/horticulturae9050559 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vitro Hardening – The Role of Ventilation on Acclimation Stress in Kniphofia leucocephala
McCartan, S. A., BECKETT, R. P., Ivanova, M., et al. (2004) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1023/b:grow.0000038243.00593.06 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Micropropagation of valuable walnut genotypes for timber production: new advances and insights
Licea-Moreno, R. J., Fira, A., & Chocov, G. (2020) · Annals of Silvicultural Research · doi:10.12899/asr-1932 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
In vitro cultivation of grape culture under solid-state lighting
Kurilčik, A., Miklušytė-Čanova, R., Žilinskaitė, S., et al. (2007) · Laba (Lietuvos akademinių bibliotekų direktorių asociacija) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Department of Botany, K. M. C. F. P. S., Manokari, M., Shekhawat, M., & Biotechnology Laboratory, D. O. P. S. (2017) · Botanica Pacifica · doi:10.17581/bp.2017.06105 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Trivedi, A., & Sengar, R. (2017) · International Journal of Chemical Studies · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Asayesh, Z. M., Aliniaeifard, S., & Vahdati, K. (2021) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22034/jon.2021.1922749.1105 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationBrown, P. J., Leslie, C. A., & Dandekar, A. (2020) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781780648279.0246 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dewir, Y. H., Chakrabarty, D., Hahn, E.-J., et al. (2007) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2007.764.21
Trivedi, A., Sengar, R. S., Singh, R., et al. (2017) · Biotech Today: An International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.5958/2322-0996.2017.00008.4
Ferredoxin and Flavodoxin Mediated Electron Transfer in Photosystem I
Fromme, R. (2008) · Photosynthetic Protein Complexes · doi:10.1002/9783527623464.ch15
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Aliniaeifard, 2018, Growth and photosynthetic performance of Calendula officinalis under monochromatic red light, Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol., 5, 123, 10.22059/ijhst.2018.261042.248 · DOI
- Anuchai, 2020, A review of artificial light technology; leds on in vitro cultured plant morphology and physiology, Int. J. Ind. Educ. Technol., 2, 22
- Galbiati, 1994, Photoinduction of anthocyanin in maize: a genetic approach, 39, 89
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ptak, A., Szewczyk, A., Simlat, M., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-81696-1 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Guo, R. H., Jin, Y., Liu, J., Yang, H., Cheng, L., & Yu, B. (2025) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants14071039 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“In this study, blue light increased stomatal length in Atlantic potato leaves compared to white light, consistent with findings in walnut plants [49].”
LEDs in Plant Tissue Culture: Boosting Micropropagation of Castanea sativa Cultivars
Marino, L. A., Ruffa, P., Mozzanini, E., et al. (2025) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-025-11812-6 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Chaudhary, A., & Poudyal, S. (2025) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114188 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Use of Light-Emitting Diodes on the In Vitro Rooting of Apple Tree Rootstocks
Scolaro, A. M. T., Martin, M. S. D., Vieira, R. L., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Plant Biology · doi:10.3390/ijpb16010012 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Similarly, Saeedi et al. [39] reported that a combination of blue and red LED spectra was particularly effective in promoting the growth and vegetative characteristics of walnut explants in vitro, while also enhancing carotenoid production.”
Enhancing the vase life of cut roses through spectral optimisation during greenhouse cultivation
Davarzani, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Mehrjerdi, M. Z., et al. (2025) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/aab.70083 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationSharma, U. K., Sankhyan, H. P., Rana, V. S., et al. (2024) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2024.12.010 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mahdavi, Z., Daylami, S. D., Vakilian, K. A., et al. (2025) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-025-03166-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Leaf area was selected as a proxy for plant growth, given its strong association with photosynthetic capacity, light absorption, and metabolic efficiency (Kruger and Volin 2006; Saeedi et al. 2023 ; Mahdavi et al. 2025a , b ).”
Self-citationSingh, T., Sharma, U., Kumar, R., & Agrawal, V. (2025) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-025-10526-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Zhong, L., Hao, S., Zhai, T., et al. (2024) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2024.112953 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Manokari, M., Badhepuri, M. K., Faisal, M., et al. (2024) · Trees · doi:10.1007/s00468-024-02563-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
In vitro propagation of walnut varieties from Uttarakhand
Juyal, S., Gautam, A., & Pant, M. (2024) · Environment Conservation Journal · doi:10.36953/ecj.30570524 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Saeedi et al. (2023) reported that DKW medium fortified with BA (1 mg/l) and IBA (0.0.1 mg/l) was best for nodal shoot induction in J. regia (cv. Chandler).”
InfluentialYu, S., Li, K.-H., Song, H.-L., et al. (2025) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-025-02986-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Plants use light both as an energy source for photosynthesis and as a signaling mechanism to regulate a variety of developmental and physiological responses, including photomorphogenesis, chlorophyll synthesis, and stomatal conductance (Saeedi et al. 2023).”
Davarzani, M., Zarbakhsh, S., Sarikhani, S., et al. (2026) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants15030460 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationDeepika, Sharma, S., Kumar, P., et al. (2026) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-026-03371-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“The integration of LED technology and ventilated culture vessels has proven highly effective in overcoming these limitations (Miler et al. 2019; Saeedi et al. 2023); Saeedi et al. (2024) showed that blue–red and red–far-red LEDs promoted growth, while white, green, and far-red improved leaf…”
Self-citationMogilevskaya, I. V., Zholobova, O. O., Васильевна, Т. Т., et al. (2025) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-025-11725-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Many studies have compared either the effect of monochromatic R (660 nm); and B (460 nm) light with each other or combined B (440–480 nm) and R (630–665 nm) light with monochromatic light (Saeedi et al. 2023).”
InfluentialSharma, U. K., Sankhyan, H. P., Rana, V. S., et al. (2026) · Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology · doi:10.1007/s44473-025-00034-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kumar, A., Kanika, Rani, S., et al. (2026) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-026-10647-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Manokari, M., Shekhawat, A., Faisal, M., et al. (2026) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-026-10640-x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“(Braga et al. 2022; Saeedi et al. 2023; Manokari et al. 2024).”
Parab, A. R., Kho, Y. H., Ramlal, A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s13562-026-01127-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Walter, R., Miranda, D. P., Vale, E. M., Carvalho, V. S., & Campostrini, E. (2025) · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/14620316.2025.2505176
“…plays a crucial role in in vitro cultivation, elevated concentrations of sucrose can lead to adverse effects on the plants’ photosynthetic machinery (Saeedi et al., 2023), resulting in a reduction in the water gradient potential and, consequently, a decrease in water and nutrient uptake (Ayub et…”
Xie, J., Yang, C., Wang, J., et al. (2025) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114310
Park, J.-H., Lee, J., Kim, S.-H., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-28615-0
Bege, J., Pang, W. Q., Wahyuni, D. K., et al. (2026) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-026-12287-9
“Additionally, light quality and intensity can regulate the synthesis of secondary metabolites that are implicated in stress responses and may influence gene expression (Paradiso and Proietti 2021; Saeedi et al. 2023).”
Adaptation of Hydrangea L. regenerant plants to ex vitro conditions
Осіпов, М. Ю., & Поліщук, В. В. (2026) · Agrobìologìâ · doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2026-203-1-112-118
Deligani, Z. M., Arab, M. M., Younessi‐Hamzekhanlu, M., et al. (2026) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-026-03513-z
“…artificial neural networks (ANNs), have been successfully applied to optimize micropropagation processes in several fruit tree species, including Pyrus and Prunus (Jamshidi et al. 2016, 2019, 2020; Arab et al. 2016, 2017, 2018; Vahdati et al. 2009; Saeedi et al. 2023; Ashrafi et al. 2010 ).”
Self-citationAcclimatization of Micropropagated Woody Plants
Ruffoni, B., Savona, M., Mascarello, C., et al. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28071-8_13
Light Manipulation for Improving In Vitro Response
Muleo, R., Nacheva, L., Cavallaro, V., & Pavese, V. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28071-8_4
Editorial: Light application in controlled environment horticulture
Lastochkina, O. V., & Marino, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Horticulture · doi:10.3389/fhort.2026.1980079
Olivares-García, C. A., Hernández-Sánchez, A. A., & Mata‐Rosas, M. (2026) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-026-10720-y
- Authors
- Saeedi, S. A., Vahdati, K., Sarikhani, S., Daylami, S. D., Davarzani, M., Gruda, N. S., & Aliniaeifard, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Tehran (IR)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Vahdati, Kourosh
- Aliniaeifard, Sasan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-11-17
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 1292045-1292045
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10690960
- OpenAlex
- W4388763942
- Semantic Scholar
- d2eb110f50733dbb3e8620fbaa7508ea8db964f4
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Iran National Science Foundation
- University of Tehran
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Keywords
- Juglans regia, Chandler cultivar, light spectrum, LED lighting, red and blue light, far-red light, stomatal traits, photosynthetic activity, micropropagation, explants, anthocyanins, soluble sugars, acclimatization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review