The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional stacking of three resistance genes against Phytophthora infestans in potato
Open accessAbstract
Functional stacking of broad spectrum resistance (R) genes could potentially be an effective strategy for more durable disease resistance, for example, to potato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans (Pi). For this reason, three broad spectrum potato R genes (Rpi), Rpi-sto1 (Solanum stoloniferum), Rpi-vnt1.1 (S. venturii) and Rpi-blb3 (S. bulbocastanum) were selected, combined into a single binary vector pBINPLUS and transformed into the susceptible cultivar Desiree. Among the 550 kanamycin resistant regenerants, 28 were further investigated by gene specific PCRs. All regenerants were positive for the nptII gene and 23 of them contained the three Rpi genes, referred to as triple Rpi gene transformants. Detached leaf assay and agro-infiltration of avirulence (Avr) genes showed that the 23 triple Rpi gene transformants were resistant to the selected isolates and showed HR with the three Avr effectors indicating functional stacking of all the three Rpi genes. It is concluded that Avr genes, corresponding to the R genes to be stacked, must be available in order to assay for functionality of each stack component. No indications were found for silencing or any other negative effects affecting the function of the inserted Rpi genes. The resistance spectrum of these 23 triple Rpi gene transformants was, as expected, a sum of the spectra from the three individual Rpi genes. This is the first example of a one-step approach for the simultaneous domestication of three natural R genes against a single disease by genetic transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Cited by
Pivoting the Plant Immune System from Dissection to Deployment
Dangl, J. L., Horvath, D. M., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1236011 · Cited by 1,252
Susceptibility Genes 101: How to Be a Good Host
van Schie, C. C. N., & Takken, F. L. W. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045854 · Cited by 658
Fungicide resistance management: Maximizing the effective life of plant protection products
Corkley, I., Fraaije, B., & Hawkins, N. (2022) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/ppa.13467 · Cited by 280
Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development
Holme, I. B., Wendt, T., & Holm, P. B. (2013) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12055 · Cited by 259
Gene pyramiding for sustainable crop improvement against biotic and abiotic stresses
Dormatey, R., Sun, C., Ali, K., Coulter, J. A., Bi, Z., & Bai, J. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10091255 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, S., Li, Y., Vossen, J. H., Visser, R. G. F., & Jacobsen, E.
- Venue
- Transgenic Research
- Published
- 2011-04-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-99
- ISSN
- 0962-8819 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-9368
- OpenAlex
- W2000045169
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional stacking of three resistance genes against Phytophthora infestans in potato. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11248-011-9510-1
- The paper
- Zhu, S., Li, Y., Vossen, J. H., Visser, R. G. F., & Jacobsen, E. (2012). Functional stacking of three resistance genes against Phytophthora infestans in potato. Transgenic Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9510-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.