Cited by 18Parasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFecal contamination and water qualityFood Safety and Hygiene

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Participatory probabilistic assessment of the risk to human health associated with cryptosporidiosis from urban dairying in Dagoretti, Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract

We carried out a participatory risk assessment to estimate the risk (negative consequences and their likelihood) from zoonotic Cryptosporidium originating in dairy farms in urban Dagoretti, Nairobi to dairy farm households and their neighbours. We selected 20 households at high risk for Cryptosporidium from a larger sample of 300 dairy households in Dagoretti based on risk factors present. We then conducted a participatory mapping of the flow of the hazard from its origin (cattle) to human potential victims. This showed three main exposure pathways (food and water borne, occupational and recreational). This was used to develop a fault tree model which we parameterised using information from the study and literature. A stochastic simulation was used to estimate the probability of exposure to zoonotic cryptosporidiosis originating from urban dairying. Around 6 % of environmental samples were positive for Cryptosporidium. Probability of exposure to Cryptosporidium from dairy cattle ranged from 0.0055 for people with clinical acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in non-dairy households to 0.0102 for children under 5 years from dairy households. Most of the estimated health burden was born by children. Although dairy cattle are the source of Cryptosporidium, the model suggests consumption of vegetables is a greater source of risk than consumption of milk. In conclusion, by combining participatory methods with quantitative microbial risk assessment, we were able to rapidly, and with…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11250-012-0204-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. APHRC, 2008, The Economic, Health, and Social Context of HIV Infection in Informal Urban Settlements of Nairobi. Nairobi, (African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi).
  2. Carey CM, Lee H, Trevors JT, 2004. Biology, persistence and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts, Water Research, 38 (4), 818–62 · DOI
  3. Chambers R., 1983. Rural Development: Putting the Last First, (Longman, London).
  4. DuPont, H.L., Chappell, C.L., Sterling, C.R., Okhuysen, P.C., Rose, J.B. and Jakubowski, W., 1995. The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers, New England Journal of Medicine, 30, 332 (13), 855–9. · DOI
  5. FDA, 1998, Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria, Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th Edition, Revision A, Chapter 4, (Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring).
  6. Gatei, W., Wamae, C.N., Mbae, C., Waruru, A., Mulinge, E., Waithera, T., Gatika, S.M., Kamwati, S.K., Revathi, G. and Hart, C.A., 2006. Cryptosporidiosis: prevalence, genotype analysis, and symptoms associated with infections in children in Kenya. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 75(1), 78–82. · DOI
  7. Grace, D., Randolph, T., Olawoye, J., Dipelou, M. and Kang’ethe, E., 2008a. Participatory risk assessment: a new approach for safer food in vulnerable African communities. Development in Practice, 18 (4), 611–618 · DOI
  8. Grace, D., Omore, A., Randolph, T., Kang’ethe, E., Nasinyama, G.W. and Mohammed, H., 2008b. Risk assessment for E. coli O157:H7 in marketed raw and fermented milk in selected African countries, Journal of Food Protection, 27(2), 257–263. · DOI
  9. Hoornstra, C. and Hartog, B., 2003. A quantitative risk assessment on Cryptosporidium in food and water. In: G. Duffy (ed.), Cryptosporidium Research Project, (Teagasc, Dublin).
  10. Hunter, P.R. and Thompson, R.C., 2005. The zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium, International Journal of Parasitology, 35(11-12), 1181–90. · DOI
  11. Kange'the, E.K., McDermott, B., M'ibui, G.M., Randolph, T.F., and Langat, A.K., 2007. Investigation into the prevalence of bovine cryptosporidiosis among small-holder dairy households in Dagoretti Division, Nairobi, Kenya, East African Medical Journal, 84 (Supplement), S76–S82.
  12. Mota, A., Mena, K.D., Soto-Beltran, M., Tarwater, P.M. and Cháidez, C., 2009. Risk assessment of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water irrigating fresh produce in Mexico, Journal of Food Protection, 72(10), 2184–8. · DOI
  13. Nasser AM, Tweto E and Nitzan Y., 2007, Die-off of Cryptosporidium parvum in soil and wastewater effluents. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102(1),169–76. · DOI
  14. Pintar, K.D., Fazil, A., Pollari, F., Charron, D.F., Waltner-Toews, D. and McEwen, S.A., 2010. A risk assessment model to evaluate the role of fecal contamination in recreational water on the incidence of cryptosporidiosis at the community level in Ontario, Risk Analysis, 30, (1), 49–64. · DOI
  15. Pönka, A., Kotilainen, H., Rimhanen-Finne, R., Hokkanen, P., Hänninen, M.L., Kaarna, A., Meri, T. and Kuusi, M., 2009. A foodborne outbreak due to Cryptosporidium parvum in Helsinki, Eurosurveillance, 14 (28), 1–3. · DOI
  16. UNAIDS, 2006. Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, (UNAIDS, Geneva)
  17. UNICEF (2008). Nutritional care of HIV-positive children in Kenya, Malawi and Zambia: A progress review, (UNICEF, Nairobi)
  18. WHO, 2009, Risk Assessment of Cryptosporidium in Drinking-water, (World Health Organisation, Geneva).
  19. World Bank, 2008, Kenya Poverty and inequality assessment, Volume 1 Synthesis report, (World Bank, Washington)

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Grace, D., Monda, J., Karanja, N., Randolph, T. F., & Kang’ethe, E. K.
Affiliations
  • International Livestock Research Institute (KE)
  • University of Nairobi (KE)
Corresponding author
Grace, Delia
Venue
Tropical Animal Health and Production
Published
2012-08-12
Volume
44
Issue
S1
Pages
33-40
ISSN
  • 0049-4747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7438
OpenAlex
W2038059553
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tropical Animal Health and Production (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
cryptosporidiosis, Cryptosporidium, zoonoses, participatory risk assessment, quantitative microbial risk assessment, fault tree model, stochastic simulation, exposure pathways, dairy cattle, children under five, HIV/AIDS, vegetable consumption, milk consumption, environmental contamination
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adult, Animals, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cryptosporidiosis, Cryptosporidium, Dairying, Foodborne Diseases, Humans, Kenya, Models, Theoretical, Occupational Diseases, Recreation, Stochastic Processes, Urban Health, Zoonoses, Models, Statistical, Risk Assessment, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review