CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 257Recommender Systems and TechniquesMuseums and Cultural HeritageWeb Applications and Data Management

Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead

Open access
Ardissono, Liliana, Kuflik, Tsvi, Petrelli, Daniela·2012·User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
DOI 10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Curators often overwhelm visitors with irrelevant data, and considering user interests and needs helps avoid information overload and improve the visitor experience.

    “On the other hand, in the case of museums, it is noted in [15] those curators, in their attempt to provide as much information as possible about heritage elements, often end up overwhelming visitors with data that they find irrelevant.For this reason, considering user characteristics such as their interests and needs helps to avoid information overload and improve the visitor experience.”

    From Motiv-ARCHE: co-creation of augmented reality educational content to motivate cultural and natural heritage learning (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction says large cultural-heritage collections risk overloading users and that visitors need help finding information relevant to their interests and needs. The paper supports personalization as a way to improve access, but it does not say curators often overwhelm visitors by trying to provide as much information as possible. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Learning of cultural and natural heritage takes place in three types of environments: indoor, outdoor, and virtual.

    “• Indoor: learning takes place in enclosed spaces, such as museums, classrooms, excavations, or art galleries, among others.”

    From Motiv-ARCHE: co-creation of augmented reality educational content to motivate cultural and natural heritage learning (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    Section 2, “A Comparative Analysis,” distinguishes indoor, outdoor, and virtual settings for interaction with cultural-heritage systems. It does not classify learning in cultural and natural heritage into those three environments. The cited paper discusses museums and galleries, but the supplied passages do not establish classrooms or excavations as indoor learning settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Adapting information at heritage sites prevents users from being overloaded with irrelevant content by tailoring materials to their characteristics and needs.

    “Similarly, it has been found that adapting information at heritage sites prevents users from being overloaded with irrelevant content by tailoring the materials to their characteristics and needs [15].”

    From Motiv-ARCHE: co-creation of augmented reality educational content to motivate cultural and natural heritage learning (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M. and Torasso, P.: 2003, INTRIGUE: Personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and handset devices. Applied Artificial Intelligence 17(8-9), 687-714.
  2. Astudillo, H., Inostroza, P. and Lopez, C.: 2008, Context/SR: a multi-institutional semantic integration platform. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2008. Montreal, Quebec, Canada Consulted July 20, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2008/papers/astudillo/astudillo.html
  3. Bernstein, S.: 2008, Where do we go from here? Continuing with Web 2.0 at the Brooklyn Museum. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2008. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Consulted July 20, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2008/papers/bernstein/bernstein.html
  4. Berkovsky, S., Kuflik, T. and Ricci, F.: 2008, Mediation of user models for enhanced personalization in recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(3), 245-286.
  5. Bianchi, A. and Zancanaro, M.: 1999, Tracking Users' Movements in an Artistic Physical Space. In: M. Caenepeel, D. Benyon and D. Smoth (eds.): Community of the Future: Proceedings of the i3 Annual Conference. Siena, Italy, 103-106.
  6. Bohnert, F., Zukerman, I., Berkovsky, S., Baldwin, T. and Sonenberg, L.: Using Interest and Transition Models to Predict Visitor Locations in Museums. AI Communications 21(2-3), 195-202, 2008.
  7. Bohnert, F. and Zukerman, I.: 2009, Using Keyword-Based Approaches to Adaptively Predict Interest in Museum Exhibits. In: A. Nicholson and X. Li (eds.): Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Joint Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 656- 665.
  8. Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M.: 2007, Content-based recommendation systems: In: P. Brusilovsky and A. Kobsa and W. Nejdl (eds.): The Adaptive Web. Methods and strategies of web personalization. Berlin: Springer, 325-341.
  9. Bonis, B., Stamos, J., Vosinakis, S., Andreou, I. and Panayiotopoulos, T.: 2009, A platform for virtual museums with personalized content. Multimedia tools and applications 42(2), 139- 159.
  10. Calder, J., Melengoglou, A.C., Callaway, C., Not, E., Pianesi, F., Androutsopoulos, I., Spyropoulos, C.D., Xydas, G., Kouroupetroglou, G. and Roussou, M.: 2005, Multilingual Personalized Information Objects. In: O. Stock and M. Zancanaro (eds.): Multimodal Intelligent Information Presentation. Netherlands. Springer, 177-201.
  11. Callaway, C., Not, E., Novello, A., Rocchi, C., Stock, O. and Zancanaro, M.: 2005, Automatic cinematography and multilingual NLG for generating video documentaries. Artificial Intelligence 165(1), 57-89.
  12. Carmagnola, F., Cena, F., Console, L., Cortassa, O., Gena, C., Goy, A., Torre, I., Toso, A. and Vernero, F.: 2008, Tag-based user modeling for social multi-device adaptive guides. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(5), 497-538.
  13. Cena, F., Console, L., Gena, C., Goy, A., Levi, G., Modeo, S. and Torre, I.: 2006, Integrating heterogeneous adaptation techniques to build a flexible and usable mobile tourist guide. AI Communications 19(4), 369-384.
  14. Cheverst, K., Davies, N., Mitchell K. and Smith P.: 2000, Providing Tailored (Context-Aware) Information to City Visitors. In: P. Brusilovsky, O. Stock and C. Strapparava (eds.): Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems: Proceedings of the International Conference, AH 2000, Trento, Italy, 73-85.
  15. Ciavarella, C. and Paternò, F.: 2004, The design of a handheld, location-aware guide for indoor environments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(2), 82-91.
  16. Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., van Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L. and Wielinga, B.: 2008, The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content- based art recommender. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(5), 455-496.
  17. Dalton, J.B.: 2010, Can structured metadata play nice with tagging systems? Parsing new meanings from classification-based descriptions on Flickr Commons. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2010. Denver, CO, USA, Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2010/papers/dalton/dalton.html
  18. Damiano, R., Gena, C., Lombardo, V., Nunnari, F. and Pizzo, A.: 2008, A stroll with Carletto: adaptation in drama-based tours with virtual characters. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(5), 417-453.
  19. de Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G., and Basile, P.: 2008, Integrating tags in a semantic content-based recommender. In: P. Pu, D. Bridge, B. Mobasher, and F. Ricci (eds.): Recommender Systems: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference. Lausanne, Switzerland, 163-170.
  20. Dicker, E.: 2010, The impact of blogs and other social media in the life of a curator. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2010. Denver, CO, USA, Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2010/papers/dicker/dicker.html
  21. Falk, J: 2009, Identity and the museum visit experience. Walnut Creek, CA, Left Coast Press.
  22. Filippini Fantoni, S.: 2003. Personalization through IT in Museums. Does it really work? The case of the Marble Museum website. In: Cultural institutions and digital technology: Proceedings of ICHIM03: Paris. Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/publishing/ichim03/070C.pdf
  23. Fink, J., Kobsa, A. and Nill, A.: 1998, Adaptable and adaptive information provision for all users, including disabled and elderly people. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 4, 163-188.
  24. Fink, J. and Kobsa, A.: 2002, User Modeling for personalized city tours. Artificial Intelligence Review 18, 33-74.
  25. Fisher, M., Kitchen Interactive, N. and Twiss-Garrity, B.A.: 2007, Remixing exhibits: constructing participatory narratives with on-line tools to augment museum experiences. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2007. San Francisco, CA, Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/fisher/fisher.html
  26. Garzotto F., Cinotti T. and Pigozzi M.: 2003, Designing multi-channel web frameworks for cultural tourism applications: the MUSE case study. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2003. Charlotte, NC, USA. Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2003/papers/garzotto/garzotto.html
  27. Ghiani, G., Leporino, B., Paternò, F. and Santoro, S.: 2008, Exploiting RFIDs and tilt-based interaction for mobile museum guides accessible to vision-impaired users. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler and A. Karshmer (eds.): Computers helping people with special needs: eleventh International Conference, ICCHP 2008. Linz, Austria, 1070-1077.
  28. Hanani, U., Shapira, B. and Shoval, P.: 2001, Information Filtering: Overview of Issues, Research and Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(3), 203-259.
  29. Hatala, M. and Wakkary, R.: 2005, Ontology-based user modeling in an augmented audio reality system for museums. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 15(3-4), 339-380.
  30. Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm, B., Schmitz, M. and von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M.: 2005, GUMO -the General User Model Ontology. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling (UM'2005), Edinburgh, UK, 2005, 428-432.
  31. Heckmann, D. and Krüger, A.: 2003, A User Modeling Markup Language (UserML) for Ubiquitous Computing. In: P. Brusilovsky, A. Corbett, F. de Rosis (eds.): Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on User Modeling, Johnstown, PA, USA. 393-397.
  32. Jackson, S. and Adamson, R.: 2009, Doing it for the kids: Tate online on engaging, entertaining and (stealthily) educating six to 12-year-olds. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web 2009: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2009. Indianapolis, IA, USA. Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2009/papers/jackson/jackson.html
  33. Jameson, A. and Smyth, B.: 2007, Recommendation to groups. In: P. Brusilovsky and A. Kobsa and W. Nejdl (eds.): The Adaptive Web. Methods and strategies of web personalization. Berlin: Springer, 596-627.
  34. Karagiannidis, C. and Sampos, D.: 2000, Layered Evaluation of Adaptive Applications and Services. In: P. Brusilovsky, O. Stock and C. Strapparava (eds.): Adaptive Hypertext -AH 2000: Proceedings, Springer LNCS 1892, 343-346.
  35. Kay, J., Lum, A., Niu, W.: 2005, A scrutable museum tour guide system. In: A. Butz, C. Kray and A. Krüger (eds.): Multi-User and Ubiquitous User Interfaces: 2nd Workshop, Proceedings Jan. 9, 2005 , San Diego, USA 19-20.
  36. Kobsa, A.: 2001, Generic User Modeling Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted 11(1), 49-63.
  37. Krösche, J., Baldzer, J. and Boll, S.: 2004, MobiDENK -Mobile Multimedia in Monument Conservation. IEEE MultiMedia, 11(2), 72-77.
  38. Kuflik, T., Kay J. and Kummerfeld, B.: 2010, Lifelong Personalized Museum Experiences. In S. Berkovsky, F. Bohnert, F. Carmagnola, D. Cheng, D. Heckmann, T. Kuflik, P. Nurmi, and K. Partridge (eds.): Proceedings of Workshop on Pervasive User Modeling and Personalization (PUMP'10). June 2010, Big Island Hawaii, 9-16.
  39. Kuflik, T., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Gorfinkel, A., Jbara, S., Sheidin, J. and Kashtan, N.: 2011, A Visitor's Guide in an "Active Museum": Presentations, Communications, and Reflection. ACM Journal of Computers and Cultural Heritage 3(3).
  40. Lops, P., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G., Musto, C., Narducci, F., Bux, M.: 2009, A Semantic Content-Based Recommender System Integrating Folksonomies for Personalized Access. In: G. Castellano, L.C. Jain and A.M. Fanelli (eds.): Web Personalization in Intelligent Environments, vol. SCI 229: Springer, 27-47.
  41. Lord, B.: 2007, The manual of museum learning. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  42. Marti, P. and Lanzi, P.: 2001, I enjoyed that this much! Techniques for measuring usability in leisure-oriented applications. In: J. Bawa, P. Dorazio and L. Trenner (eds.): The Usability Business: Making the Web Work. Springer, 49-59.
  43. Masthoff, J.: 2004, Group modeling: Selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 14(1), 37-85.
  44. Masthoff, J. and Gatt, A.: 2006, In pursuit of satisfaction and the prevention of embarrassment: affective state in group recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16(3-4), 281-319.
  45. Oberlander, J., O'Donnell, M., Mellish, C. and Knott, A.: 1998, Conversation in the museum: experiments in dynamic hypermedia with the intelligent labeling explorer. New Review of Multimedia and Hypermedia 4, 11-32.
  46. Oberlander, J., Karakatsiotis, G., Isard, A., and Androusotpoulos, I.: 2008, Building an adaptive museum gallery in Second Life. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2008. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2008/papers/oberlander/oberlander.html
  47. O'Hare, G.M.P. and O'Grady, M.J.: 2003, Gulliver's Genie: A Multi-Agent System for Ubiquitous and Intelligent Content Delivery. Computer Communications 26(11), 1177-1187.
  48. Oppermann, R. and Specht, M. 2000, A Context-Sensitive Nomadic Exhibition Guide. In: P.J. Thomas and H. Gellersen (eds.): Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing: Proceedings of the 2nd international Symposium. Bristol, UK. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1927. Springer-Verlag, London, 127-142.
  49. Paris, C., Wan, S., Wilkinson, R. and Wu, M.: 2001, Generating Personal Travel Guides -And Who Wants Them?. In: M. Bauer, P.J. Gmytrasiewicz and J. Vassileva (eds.): User Modeling: Proceedings of the eight conference. Sonthofen, Germany, 251-253.
  50. Paternò, F. and Mancini, C.: 1999, Designing Web User Interfaces Adaptable to Different Types of Use. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web 1999: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 1999, Pittsburgh, USA. Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw99/papers/paterno/paterno.html
  51. Petrelli, D., De Angeli, A. and Convertino, G.: 1999, A User-Centered Approach to User Modeling. In: J. Kay (ed.): User Modeling: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference UM'99, 255-264.
  52. Petrelli, D. and Not, E.: 2005, User-Centred Design of Flexible Hypermedia for a Mobile Guide: Reflections on the HyperAudio Experience. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 15(3-4), 303-338.
  53. Plua, C. and Jameson, A.: 2002, Collaborative preference elicitation in a group travel recommender system In: F. Ricci and B. Smyth (eds.): Recommendation and personalization in eCommerce: Proceedings of AH 2002 workshop. Malaga, Spain, 148- 154.
  54. Rocchio, J.J.: 1971, Performance indices for document retrieval. In G. Salton (ed.): The SMART retrieval system--experiments in automatic documents processing 57-67. NJ: Englewood.
  55. Ruotsalo, T., Mälekä, E., Kauppinen, T., Hyvönen, E., Haav, K., Rantale, V., Frosterus, M., Dokoohaki, N. and Matskin, M.: 2009, Smartmuseum: Personalized Context-aware Access to Digital Cultural Heritage. In: Advances in Semantic Processing: Third International Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Libraries and the Semantic Web 2009 (ICSD2009), Trento, Italy.
  56. Schmidt-Belz, B., Laamanen, H., Poslad, S. and Zipf, A.: 2003, Location-based mobile tourist services -first user experiences. In A.J. Frew, M. Hitz, and P. O'Connor (eds.): Information Technology and Travel & Tourism. Proceedings of the tenth International Conference, Helsinki, Finland. 115-123.
  57. Schmitz, P.L. and Black, M.T.: 2008, The Delphi toolkit: enabling semantic search for museum collections. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web 2008: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2008. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2008/papers/schmitz/schmitz.html.
  58. Sparacino, F.: 2002, The museum wearable: Real-time sensor-driven understanding of visitors' interests for personalized visually-augmented museum experiences. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web 2002: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2002, Boston, MA. Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2002/papers/sparacino/sparacino.html
  59. Stein, R., Bachta, E.: 2010, Breaking the bottleneck: using pseudo-wikis to enable rich web authoring for non-technical staff members. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web 2010: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2010.
  60. Stock, O., Carenini, G., Cecconi, F., Franconi, E., Lavelli, A., Magnini, B., Pianesi, F., Ponzi, M., Samek-Lodovici, V. and Strapparava, C.: 1993, Alfresco: enjoying the combination of NLP and hypermedia for information exploration. In: Maybury, M.T. (ed.): Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, 197-224. Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press.
  61. Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Busetta, P., Callaway, C., Krüger, A., Kruppa, M., Kuflik, T., Not, E. and Rocchi, C.: 2007, Adaptive, Intelligent Presentation of Information for the Museum Visitor in PEACH. User modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 17(3), 257-304.
  62. Stock, O. and Callaway, C.: 2009, Multiple Coordinated Mobile Narratives as a Catalyst for Face- to-Face Group Conversation. In I.A. Iurgel, N. Zagalo and P. Petta (eds.): Interactive Digital Storytelling: Proceedings of the 2 nd Joint international Conference. Guimarães, Portugal, 209-220.
  63. Sumi, Y. and Mase, K.: 2001, AgentSalon: facilitating face-to-face knowledge exchange through conversations among personal agents. In: E. André, S. Sen, C. Frasson and J. Müller (eds.): Autonomous Agents. Proceedings of the fifth international Conference. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 393-400.
  64. Sylaiou, S., Mania, K., Karoulis, A. and White., M.: 2010, Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 243-253.
  65. Tallon, L. and Walker, K. (eds.): 2008, Digital Technologies and the Museum Experience: Handheld Guides and Other Media. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  66. Trant, J.: 2006, Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: proof of concept. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 12(1), 83-105.
  67. Van Loon, H., Gabriels, K., Luyten, K., Teunkens, D., Roberto, K., Coninx, K. and Manshoven, E.: 2007, Supporting social interaction: a collaborative trading game on PDA. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.): Museums and the Web 2007: Proceedings of the International Conference for Culture and Heritage Online 2007. San Francisco, CA, Consulted June 27, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/vanLoon/vanLoon.html.
  68. Vassileva, J. and Sun, L.: 2007, Using community visualization to stimulate participation in online communities. e-Service Journal 6(1), 3-39.
  69. Vom Lehn, D., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P. and Heath, C.: 2007, Engaging Constable: Revealing Art with New Technology, Proceedings of CHI 2007, San Jose, California, USA, 1485-1494.
  70. Wang, Y., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., Gorgels, P., Rutledge, L. and Schreiber, G.: 2008, Recommendations based on semantically enriched museum collections. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(4), 283-290.
  71. Wang, Y., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., Hollink, L. and Schreiber, G.: 2009, Semantic relations in content- based recommender systems. In: Y. Gil and N. Fridman Noy (eds.): Knowledge Capture: Proceedings of the fifth International Conference. Redondo Beach, CA, 209-210.
  72. Weibelzahl, S.: 2002, Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, Ph.D Thesis, University of Freiburg.
  73. Weibelzahl, S.: 2005, Problems and Pitfalls in Evaluating Adaptive Systems. In: S. Y. Chen and G. D. Magoulas (eds.): Adaptable and Adaptive Hypermedia Systems. Hershey, PA: IRM Press, 285-299.
  74. Wilkening, S. and Chung, J.: 2009, Life stages of the museum visitor: Building engagement over a lifetime. Washington DC: American Association of Museums Press.
  75. Yatani, K., Onuma, M., Sugimoto, M. and Kusunoki, F.: 2004, Musex: A system for supporting children's collaborative learning in a museum with PDAs. Systems and Computers in Japan 35(14), 54-63.
  76. Zancanaro, M., Kuflik, T., Boger, Z., Goren-Bar, D., Goldwasser, D.: 2007, Analyzing museum visitors' behavior patterns. In: C. Conati, K.F. McCoy, and G. Paliouras (eds.): User Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4511, 238-246.
  77. Zimmermann, A. and Lorenz, A.: 2008, LISTEN: a user-adaptive audio-augmented museum guide. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(5), 389-416.
  78. Author biographies Liliana Ardissono is an Associate Professor at the Dipartimento di Informatica of the Università di Torino, where she obtained her university degree and her Ph. D. in Computer Science. Her research interests include User Modeling, Adaptive Hypermedia and Cloud Computing. She has investigated the development and exploitation of personalization techniques for various domains, such as recommendation, awareness support and presentation of Cultural Heritage information. She is the Secretary of the Board of Directors of User Modeling Inc. and she is a member of the Editorial Board of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction -The Journal of Personalization Research.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T., & Petrelli, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ardissono, Liliana
ORCID
Venue
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-10-18
Volume
22
Issue
1-2
Pages
73-99
ISSN
  • 0924-1868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1391
DOI
10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x
OpenAlex
W2164949742
Cited by
257
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
27.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
Keywords
personalization, cultural heritage, museum websites, mobile guides, virtual collections, user modeling, contextual adaptation, group modeling, semantic web, Web 2.0, heritage tourism, kiosks, information filtering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review