Laboratory study of stormwater biofiltration in low temperatures: total and dissolved metal removals and fates
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The filter material accounts for the majority of metal removal in stormwater bioretention systems.
“However, the filter material accounts for the majority of metal removal (Muthanna et al., 2007; Blecken et al., 2009, Blecken et al., 2011) and hence, filter material composition is crucial for achieving effective dissolved metal treatment.”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Blecken et al., 2011
Several pilot-scale studies have shown LTU top-layer to be an efficient metal adsorbent.
“Several pilot-scale studies (Blecken et al., 2011; Søberg et al., 2017) have shown this material to be an efficient metal adsorbent.”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Blecken et al., 2011
The bioretention systems examined in the cited studies were relatively young (<2 years) and found metals to be adsorbed in the top 5 cm of the filter material, so these systems were far from saturated with metals.
“Moreover, the bioretention systems examined in the cited studies (Muthanna et al., 2007; Hatt et al., 2008; Blecken et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2017; Søberg et al., 2017) were relatively young (<2 years) and found metals to be adsorbed in the top 5 cm of the filter material. Hence, these systems were far from saturated with metals.”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Blecken et al., 2011
Conflicting results have been observed in previous studies regarding removal of dissolved metals in stormwater bioretention systems: some found efficient retention, while others found substantial leaching.
“Conflicting results have been observed in previous studies regarding removal of dissolved metals in stormwater bioretention systems. Some have found that dissolved metals are efficiently retained (e.g. Blecken et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2017), while others have found substantial leaching (e.g. Muthanna et al., 2007; Hatt et al., 2008; Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Blecken et al., 2011
LTU-TOP efficiently removed metals in pilot-scale bioretention facilities under various ambient conditions, despite showing very low adsorption capacities in the present study.
“Although it showed very low adsorption capacities in the present study (Fig. 2), LTU-TOP efficiently removed metals in pilot-scale bioretention facilities under various ambient conditions (e.g. Blecken et al., 2009; Blecken et al., 2011; Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Blecken et al., 2011
Cites
Snowmelt pollutant removal in bioretention areas
Muthanna, T. M., Viklander, M., Blecken, G., & Thorolfsson, S. T. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.040 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Søberg, L. C., Winston, R., Viklander, M., & Blecken, G.-T. (2019) · Water Research X · doi:10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100032 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“However, it has a lower percentage of fines than recommended by the FAWB to enhance infiltration during freeze-thaw cycles (Blecken et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Blecken, G.-T., Marsalek, J., & Viklander, M.
- Affiliations
- Luleå University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Blecken, Godecke-Tobias
- Venue
- Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
- Published
- 2010-12-08
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 303-317
- ISSN
- 0049-6979 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2932
- OpenAlex
- W2023130308
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Water Air & Soil Pollution (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- J. Gustaf Richert Stiftelse
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Keywords
- low-temperature operation, metal removal, copper removal, cadmium, lead, zinc, topsoil, plant metal uptake, dissolved organic matter, low impact development, water sensitive urban design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review