Cited by 79Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsHeavy metals in environment

Laboratory study of stormwater biofiltration in low temperatures: total and dissolved metal removals and fates

Blecken, Godecke-Tobias, Marsalek, Jiri, Viklander, Maria·2011·Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11270-010-0708-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The filter material accounts for the majority of metal removal in stormwater bioretention systems.

    “However, the filter material accounts for the majority of metal removal (Muthanna et al., 2007; Blecken et al., 2009, Blecken et al., 2011) and hence, filter material composition is crucial for achieving effective dissolved metal treatment.”
  • Several pilot-scale studies have shown LTU top-layer to be an efficient metal adsorbent.

    “Several pilot-scale studies (Blecken et al., 2011; Søberg et al., 2017) have shown this material to be an efficient metal adsorbent.”
  • The bioretention systems examined in the cited studies were relatively young (<2 years) and found metals to be adsorbed in the top 5 cm of the filter material, so these systems were far from saturated with metals.

    “Moreover, the bioretention systems examined in the cited studies (Muthanna et al., 2007; Hatt et al., 2008; Blecken et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2017; Søberg et al., 2017) were relatively young (<2 years) and found metals to be adsorbed in the top 5 cm of the filter material. Hence, these systems were far from saturated with metals.”
  • Conflicting results have been observed in previous studies regarding removal of dissolved metals in stormwater bioretention systems: some found efficient retention, while others found substantial leaching.

    “Conflicting results have been observed in previous studies regarding removal of dissolved metals in stormwater bioretention systems. Some have found that dissolved metals are efficiently retained (e.g. Blecken et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2017), while others have found substantial leaching (e.g. Muthanna et al., 2007; Hatt et al., 2008; Søberg et al., 2017).”
  • LTU-TOP efficiently removed metals in pilot-scale bioretention facilities under various ambient conditions, despite showing very low adsorption capacities in the present study.

    “Although it showed very low adsorption capacities in the present study (Fig. 2), LTU-TOP efficiently removed metals in pilot-scale bioretention facilities under various ambient conditions (e.g. Blecken et al., 2009; Blecken et al., 2011; Søberg et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blecken, G.-T., Marsalek, J., & Viklander, M.
Affiliations
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Blecken, Godecke-Tobias
Venue
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Published
2010-12-08
Volume
219
Issue
1-4
Pages
303-317
ISSN
  • 0049-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2932
OpenAlex
W2023130308
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Air & Soil Pollution (publishedVersion)
Funders
J. Gustaf Richert Stiftelse
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
low-temperature operation, metal removal, copper removal, cadmium, lead, zinc, topsoil, plant metal uptake, dissolved organic matter, low impact development, water sensitive urban design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review