Cited by 31Enzyme Production and CharacterizationEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationProteins in Food Systems

Immobilization of Bacillus licheniformis 5A1 milk-clotting enzyme and characterization of its enzyme properties

Esawy, Mona A., Combet-Blanc, Yannick·2006·World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Milk-clotting enzyme from Bacillus licheniformis 5A1 was immobilized on Amberlite IR-120 by ionic binding. Almost all the enzyme activity was retained on the support. The immobilized milk-clotting enzyme was repeatedly used to produce cheese in a batch reactor. The production of cheese was repeated 5 times with no loss of activity. The specific activity calculated on a bound-protein basis was slightly higher than that of free enzyme. The free and immobilized enzyme were highly tolerant to repeated freezing and thawing. The optimum temperature for milk-clotting activity was 70 °C with the free enzyme whereas, it was ranged from 70 to 80 °C with the immobilized milk-clotting enzyme. The activation energy (E A) of the immobilized milk-clotting enzyme was lower than the free enzyme (E A = 1.59 and 1.99 Kcal mol-¹ respectively). The immobilized milk-clotting enzyme exhibited great thermal stability. The milk-clotting optimum pH was 7.0 for both free and immobilized enzyme. The Michaelis constant K m of the immobilized milk-clotting enzyme was slightly lower than the free enzyme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11274-005-9018-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbial-origin milk-clotting enzymes remain stable at both acidic and alkaline pH, and milk-clotting activity and therefore MCA/PA values can be influenced by both fermentation pH and enzyme activity pH.

    “The results of many studies (Esawy and Combet-Blanc, 2006;El-Bendary et al., 2007;Dutt et al., 2009;Shieh et al., 2009;Deng et al., 2010;Fazouane-Naimi et al., 2010;El-Baky et al., 2011;Irfan et al., 2011;Yegin et al., 2012;Acha et al., 2014;Silva et al., 2014;Sun et al., 2014;Ayana et al., 2015;Guleria et al., 2016;Hang et al., 2016;Kumari Narwal et al., 2016;Lemes et al., 2016;Mehdi et al., 2017”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esawy, M. A., & Combet-Blanc, Y.
Affiliations
Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Esawy, Mona A.
Venue
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2006-03
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
197-200
ISSN
  • 0959-3993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0972
OpenAlex
W2003711229
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of State
  • Ohio State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
Bacillus licheniformis, milk-clotting enzyme, enzyme immobilization, Amberlite IR-120, ionic bonding, cheese production, batch reactor, enzyme reusability, thermal stability, activation energy, Michaelis constant, freeze-thaw resistance, enzyme characterization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review