Cited by 21Enzyme Production and CharacterizationEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationProteins in Food Systems

Purification and characteristics of a new milk-clotting enzyme from Bacillus licheniformis BL312

Zhang, Yao, Xia, Yongjun, Ding, Zhongyang, H. Lai, Phoency F., Wang, Guangqiang, Xiong, Zhiqiang, Liu, Xiaofeng, Ai, Lianzhong·2019·LWT

Abstract

A new milk-clotting enzyme (MCE) was produced from Bacillus licheniformis BL312. The characteristics of BL312 MCE were compared with those of Calf rennet, R. miehei MCE, and Chymopapain. BL312 MCE showed a remarkable activity of 5291 SU/mg after purification by ammonium sulfate fractionation and DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow, which yielded 5.09-fold purification with a recovery of 39.24%. The purified BL312 MCE gave a single protein band on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel, corresponding to 27 kDa. The αₛ-casein (αₛ-CN) and β-casein (β-CN) hydrolysates generated by BL312 MCE were different from those by Calf rennet, R. miehei MCE, and Chymopapain through SDS-PAGE and reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) analyses. The main cleavage sites in κ-casein (κ-CN) were the Met106-Ala107 and Asn123-Thr124 bonds for BL312 MCE, as determined by mass spectrometry analysis. BL312 MCE hydrolyzed αₛ-CN to a greater level than β-CN. It was stable at a wide pH range of 5.5–11.0 and temperature below 45 °C. The milk-clotting activity (MCA) reached the maximum when the substrate contained 50 mM CaCl₂ at pH 5.5. The optimal temperature of MCE was 55 °C. The successful application in Monascus-fermented cheese production confirmed the usefulness of BL312 MCE in food and dairy processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108276

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Xia, Y., Ding, Z., H. Lai, P. F., Wang, G., Xiong, Z., Liu, X., & Ai, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN)
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ai, Lianzhong
Venue
LWT
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
113
Pages
108276
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952103111
Cited by
21
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
LWT (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Talent Program (14QB1400200)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
  • National “Twelfth Five-Year” Plan for Science and Technology (2013BAD18B02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
milk-clotting enzyme, Bacillus licheniformis, enzyme purification, casein hydrolysis, alpha-casein, β-casein, enzyme stability, calcium dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review