Cited by 65Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AI

A deep learning-based privacy-preserving model for smart healthcare in internet of medical things using fog computing

Open access
Moqurrab, Syed Atif, Tariq, Noshina, Anjum, Adeel, Asheralieva, Alia, Malik, Saif U. R., Malik, Hassan, Pervaiz, Haris, Gill, Sukhpal Singh·2022·Wireless Personal Communications

Abstract

With the emergence of COVID-19, smart healthcare, the Internet of Medical Things, and big data-driven medical applications have become even more important. The biomedical data produced is highly confidential and private. Unfortunately, conventional health systems cannot support such a colossal amount of biomedical data. Hence, data is typically stored and shared through the cloud. The shared data is then used for different purposes, such as research and discovery of unprecedented facts. Typically, biomedical data appear in textual form (e.g., test reports, prescriptions, and diagnosis). Unfortunately, such data is prone to several security threats and attacks, for example, privacy and confidentiality breach. Although significant progress has been made on securing biomedical data, most existing approaches yield long delays and cannot accommodate real-time responses. This paper proposes a novel fog-enabled privacy-preserving model called δ r sanitizer, which uses deep learning to improve the healthcare system. The proposed model is based on a Convolutional Neural Network with Bidirectional-LSTM and effectively performs Medical Entity Recognition. The experimental results show that δ r sanitizer outperforms the state-of-the-art models with 91.14% recall, 92.63% in precision, and 92% F1-score. The sanitization model shows 28.77% improved utility preservation as compared to the state-of-the-art.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11277-021-09323-0

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Edge computing has already demonstrated active participation of different industrial interests, namely hardware and IT (mDCs and FC) and telecommunications (MEC).

    “Industry players: Edge computing has already demonstrated the active participation of different industrial interests, namely hardware and IT (mDCs and FC) and telecommunications (MEC) [31].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes fog computing as an intermediary layer at the network edge, but does not discuss participation by hardware, IT, or telecommunications companies. Searches for industrial interests, mDCs, FC, and MEC found no passage in our copy supporting that claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Li, J., Sun, A., Han, J., & Li, C. (2020). A survey on deep learning for named entity recognition. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moqurrab, S. A., Tariq, N., Anjum, A., Asheralieva, A., Malik, S. U. R., Malik, H., Pervaiz, H., & Gill, S. S.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (PK)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Cybernetica (Estonia) (EE)
  • Edge Hill University (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gill, Sukhpal Singh
Venue
Wireless Personal Communications
Published
2022-08-30
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
2379-2401
ISSN
  • 0929-6212 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-834X
OpenAlex
W4293567445
Cited by
65
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wireless Personal Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61950410603)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
Internet of Medical Things, fog computing, smart healthcare, medical entity recognition, convolutional neural networks, bidirectional LSTM, health data sharing, utility preservation, real-time data processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review