The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competitive fragmentation modeling of ESI-MS/MS spectra for putative metabolite identification
Open accessAbstract
Electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) is commonly used in high throughput metabolomics. One of the key obstacles to the effective use of this technology is the difficulty in interpreting measured spectra to accurately and efficiently identify metabolites. Traditional methods for automated metabolite identification compare the target MS or MS/MS spectrum to the spectra in a reference database, ranking candidates based on the closeness of the match. However the limited coverage of available databases has led to an interest in computational methods for predicting reference MS/MS spectra from chemical structures. This work proposes a probabilistic generative model for the MS/MS fragmentation process, which we call competitive fragmentation modeling (CFM), and a machine learning approach for learning parameters for this model from MS/MS data. We show that CFM can be used in both a MS/MS spectrum prediction task (ie, predicting the mass spectrum from a chemical structure), and in a putative metabolite identification task (ranking possible structures for a target MS/MS spectrum). In the MS/MS spectrum prediction task, CFM shows significantly improved performance when compared to a full enumeration of all peaks corresponding to substructures of the molecule. In the metabolite identification task, CFM obtains substantially better rankings for the correct candidate than existing methods (MetFrag and FingerID) on tripeptide and metabolite data, when querying PubChem or KEGG for candidate structures of similar mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Sumner, L. W., Amberg, A., Barrett, D., Beale, M. H., Beger, R., Daykin, C. A., Fan, T. W.-M., Fiehn, O., Goodacre, R., Griffin, J. L., et al. (2007) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 · Cited by 5,368
Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731829 · Cited by 1,537
Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification
Stein, S. E., & Scott, D. R. (1994) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)87009-8 · Cited by 882
In silico fragmentation for computer assisted identification of metabolite mass spectra
Wolf, S., Schmidt, S., Müller-Hannemann, M., & Neumann, S. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-148 · Cited by 698
Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics
Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.021 · Cited by 616
Cited by
PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces
Kim, S., Chen, J., Cheng, T., Gindulyte, A., He, J., He, S., Li, Q., Shoemaker, B. A., Thiessen, P. A., Yu, B., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa971 · Cited by 3,953
Searching molecular structure databases with tandem mass spectra using CSI:FingerID
Dührkop, K., Shen, H., Meusel, M., Rousu, J., & Böcker, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509788112 · Cited by 1,190
MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation
Ruttkies, C., Schymanski, E. L., Wolf, S., Hollender, J., & Neumann, S. (2016) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0115-9 · Cited by 1,052
Systematic classification of unknown metabolites using high-resolution fragmentation mass spectra
Dührkop, K., Nothias, L.-F., Fleischauer, M., Reher, R., Ludwig, M., Hoffmann, M. A., Petras, D., Gerwick, W. H., Rousu, J., Dorrestein, P. C., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0740-8 · Cited by 860
High-confidence structural annotation of metabolites absent from spectral libraries
Hoffmann, M. A., Nothias, L.-F., Ludwig, M., Fleischauer, M., Gentry, E. C., Witting, M., Dorrestein, P. C., Dührkop, K., & Böcker, S. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01045-9 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, F., Greiner, R., & Wishart, D.
- Venue
- Metabolomics
- Published
- 2014-06-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-110
- ISSN
- 1573-3882 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3890
- OpenAlex
- W2115993694
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competitive fragmentation modeling of ESI-MS/MS spectra for putative metabolite identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11306-014-0676-4
- The paper
- Allen, F., Greiner, R., & Wishart, D. (2015). Competitive fragmentation modeling of ESI-MS/MS spectra for putative metabolite identification. Metabolomics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0676-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.