Cited by 388Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

High-confidence structural annotation of metabolites absent from spectral libraries

Open access
Hoffmann, Martin A., Nothias, Louis-Félix, Ludwig, Marcus, Fleischauer, Markus, Gentry, Emily C., Witting, Michael, Dorrestein, Pieter C., Dührkop, Kai +1 more·2022·Nature Biotechnology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics experiments rely on spectral libraries for structure annotation, but, typically, only a small fraction of spectra can be matched. Previous in silico methods search in structure databases but cannot distinguish between correct and incorrect annotations. Here we introduce the COSMIC workflow that combines in silico structure database generation and annotation with a confidence score consisting of kernel density P value estimation and a support vector machine with enforced directionality of features. On diverse datasets, COSMIC annotates a substantial number of hits at low false discovery rates and outperforms spectral library search. To demonstrate that COSMIC can annotate structures never reported before, we annotated 12 natural bile acids. The annotation of nine structures was confirmed by manual evaluation and two structures using synthetic standards. In human samples, we annotated and manually validated 315 molecular structures currently absent from the Human Metabolome Database. Application of COSMIC to data from 17,400 metabolomics experiments led to 1,715 high-confidence structural annotations that were absent from spectral libraries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-021-01045-9

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies demonstrated that bacteria have bile acid amine N-acyltransferase activity, with dozens of bacterially conjugated amino acid amidates identified.

    “Recent studies demonstrated that bacteria, in addition to the host, have bile acid amine N-acyltransferase activity, with dozens of bacterially conjugated amino acid amidates identified1–4,6,17.”

    From Bile Acids Are Substrates for Amine N-Acyl Transferase Activity by Bile Salt Hydrolase (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results section (‘Searching for novel bile acid conjugates’; page not provided) reports amino-acid-conjugated bile acids, including 12 leading novel annotations, and a matching spectrum in a bacterial culture. It says microbial involvement in producing the 12 is suggested, not demonstrated; it does not establish bacterial bile acid amine N-acyltransferase activity or the identification of dozens of bacterially conjugated amidates. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract produce amino acid bile acid amidates that can affect host-mediated metabolic processes.

    “Bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract produce amino acid bile acid amidates that can affect host-mediated metabolic processes1–6; however, the bacterial gene(s) responsible for their production remain unknown.”

    From Bile Acids Are Substrates for Amine N-Acyl Transferase Activity by Bile Salt Hydrolase (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    In Results, ‘Searching for novel bile acid conjugates’ (page unavailable), the paper describes amino-acid bile acid conjugates produced by microbes and suggests microbial involvement in producing additional conjugates. It says bile acids act as signaling molecules, but does not establish that the amino-acid conjugates affect host-mediated metabolic processes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The bacterial enzymes responsible for producing amino acid bile acid amidates are unknown.

    “The enzymes responsible for these conjugation reactions are unknown.”

    From Bile Acids Are Substrates for Amine N-Acyl Transferase Activity by Bile Salt Hydrolase (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results section, “Searching for novel bile acid conjugates” (page unavailable), describes amino acid–bile acid conjugates and suggests microbial involvement in their production. It does not address whether the enzymes responsible for the conjugation reactions are known; searches for the enzyme claim and related terms found no such statement. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]Platt, J. C. In Advances in Large Margin Classifiers (MIT Press, 2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffmann, M. A., Nothias, L.-F., Ludwig, M., Fleischauer, M., Gentry, E. C., Witting, M., Dorrestein, P. C., Dührkop, K., & Böcker, S.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (DE)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Dührkop, Kai
  • Böcker, Sebastian
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2021-10-14
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
411-421
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W3206878019
Cited by
388
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 5
FWCI
15.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01 GM107550, P41 GM103484, R03 CA211211, U19 AG063744 01)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF 7622)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
spectral library, untargeted metabolomics, support vector machine, confidence scores, bile acids, HMDB, false discovery rate
MeSH terms
Humans, Molecular Structure, Databases, Factual, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Metabolomics, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review