Cited by 11Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Utility of split-night polysomnography in the diagnosis of upper airway resistance syndrome

Abstract

Purpose Split-night polysomnography can both establish the diagnosis and titrate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during a single study in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. We sought to determine if split-night polysomnography could be effectively used in upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS) without diminishing diagnostic accuracy or success of CPAP titration. Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with UARS were included. Split-night studies were performed in patients meeting predefined criteria. We compared data between those undergoing traditional and split-night polysomnography. Results We included 100 consecutive patients (41.2 +/- 7.4 years, 54% men). Forty-six underwent split-night polysomnography. Groups were similar at baseline. There were no differences in polysomnography or success rate of CPAP titration. Among those not undergoing split-night studies, the mean time between diagnostic polysomnography and CPAP titration was 71.9 +/- 49.0 days. Conclusions Split-night polysomnography can be effectively utilized to diagnose UARS and initiate CPAP therapy. This practice can reduce the number of studies needed and obviate the inherent delay in initiating CPAP therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11325-008-0235-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ (2002) Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:1217–1239. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2109080 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Patel NP, Ahmed M, Rosen I (2007) Split-night polysomnography. Chest 132:1664–1671. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1801 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Elshaug AG, Moss JR, Southcott AM (2005) Implementation of a split-night protocol to improve efficiency in assessment and treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Intern Med J 35:251–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00786.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Phillips B, Collop N, Strollo P (1996) Controversies in sleep disorders medicine: pulmonologists respond!. Chest 110:1597–1602. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.6.1597 · DOI
  5. Kushida CA, Littner MR, Morgenthaler T et al (2005) Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: an update for 2005. Sleep 28:499–521 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Guilleminault C, Stoohs R, Duncan S (1991) Snoring (I). Daytime sleepiness in regular heavy snorers. Chest 99:40–48. doi: 10.1378/chest.99.1.40 · DOI
  7. Guilleminault C, Stoohs R, Clerk A et al (1993) A cause of excessive daytime sleepiness: the upper airway resistance syndrome. Chest 104:781–787. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.3.781 · DOI
  8. Guilleminault C, Stoohs R, Clerk A, Simmons J, Labanowski M (1992) From obstructive sleep apnea syndrome to upper airway resistance syndrome: consistency of daytime sleepiness. Sleep 15(6-supp):S13–S16
  9. Exar EN, Collop NA (1999) Upper airway resistance syndrome. Chest 115:1127–1139. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.4.1127 · DOI
  10. Loube DI, Andrada T, Howard RS (1999) Accuracy of respiratory inductive plethysmography for the diagnosis of upper airway resistance syndrome. Chest 115:1333–1337. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.5.1333 · DOI
  11. Sleep Disorders Atlas Task Force of the American Sleep Disorders Association (1992) EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples. Sleep 15:174–184 · DOI
  12. Johns MW (1993) Daytime sleepiness, snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Chest 103:30–36. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.1.30 · DOI
  13. McArdle N, Grove A, Devereux G, Mackay-Brown L, Mackay T, Douglas NJ (2000) Split-night versus full-night studies for sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J 15:670–675. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15d08.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kristo, D. A., Shah, A. A., Lettieri, C. J., MacDermott, S. M., Andrada, T., Taylor, Y., & Eliasson, A. H.
Affiliations
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lettieri, Christopher J.
Venue
Sleep and Breathing
Published
2008-12-04
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
271-275
ISSN
  • 1520-9512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1709
OpenAlex
W1969068200
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep And Breathing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
split-night polysomnography, upper airway resistance syndrome, CPAP titration, sleep-disordered breathing, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrocardiography, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Male, Manometry, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Stages, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Polysomnography, Muscle, Skeletal, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review