The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife
Open accessAbstract
Concerns over the role of pesticides affecting vertebrate wildlife populations have recently focussed on systemic products which exert broad-spectrum toxicity. Given that the neonicotinoids have become the fastest-growing class of insecticides globally, we review here 150 studies of their direct (toxic) and indirect (e.g. food chain) effects on vertebrate wildlife--mammals, birds, fish, amphibians and reptiles. We focus on two neonicotinoids, imidacloprid and clothianidin, and a third insecticide, fipronil, which also acts in the same systemic manner. Imidacloprid and fipronil were found to be toxic to many birds and most fish, respectively. All three insecticides exert sub-lethal effects, ranging from genotoxic and cytotoxic effects, and impaired immune function, to reduced growth and reproductive success, often at concentrations well below those associated with mortality. Use of imidacloprid and clothianidin as seed treatments on some crops poses risks to small birds, and ingestion of even a few treated seeds could cause mortality or reproductive impairment to sensitive bird species. In contrast, environmental concentrations of imidacloprid and clothianidin appear to be at levels below those which will cause mortality to freshwater vertebrates, although sub-lethal effects may occur. Some recorded environmental concentrations of fipronil, however, may be sufficiently high to harm fish. Indirect effects are rarely considered in risk assessment processes and there is a paucity of data, despite the potential to exert population-level effects. Our research revealed two field case studies of indirect effects. In one, reductions in invertebrate prey from both imidacloprid and fipronil uses led to impaired growth in a fish species, and in another, reductions in populations in two lizard species were linked to effects of fipronil on termite prey. Evidence presented here suggests that the systemic insecticides, neonicotinoids and fipronil, are capable of exerting direct and indirect effects on terrestrial and aquatic vertebrate wildlife, thus warranting further review of their environmental safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for Neonicotinoids
Jeschke, P., Nauen, R., Schindler, M., & Elbert, A. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101303g · Cited by 1,867
Wildlife Ecotoxicology of Pesticides: Can We Track Effects to the Population Level and Beyond?
Köhler, H.-R., & Triebskorn, R. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1237591 · Cited by 911
Decrease in eggshell weight in certain birds of prey
RATCLIFFE, D. A. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/215208a0 · Cited by 796
Cited by
Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil
Bonmatin, J.-M., Giorio, C., Girolami, V., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D. P., Krupke, C., Liess, M., Long, E., Marzaro, M., Mitchell, E. A. D., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7 · Cited by 1,372
The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
Wood, T. J., & Goulson, D. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9240-x · Cited by 623
Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services
Chagnon, M., Kreutzweiser, D., Mitchell, E. A. D., Morrissey, C. A., Noome, D. A., & Van der Sluijs, J. P. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3277-x · Cited by 578
Self-citationPisa, L., Goulson, D., Yang, E.-C., Gibbons, D., Sánchez-Bayo, F., Mitchell, E., Aebi, A., van der Sluijs, J., MacQuarrie, C. J. K., Giorio, C., et al. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0341-3 · Cited by 308
Self-citationvan der Sluijs, J. P., Amaral-Rogers, V., Belzunces, L. P., Bijleveld van Lexmond, M. F. I. J., Bonmatin, J.-M., Chagnon, M., Downs, C. A., Furlan, L., Gibbons, D. W., Giorio, C., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3229-5 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbons, D., Morrissey, C., & Mineau, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Published
- 2014-06-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-118
- ISSN
- 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7499
- OpenAlex
- W1987857434
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11356-014-3180-5
- The paper
- Gibbons, D., Morrissey, C., & Mineau, P. (2015). A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3180-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.