Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for Neonicotinoids
Abstract
In recent years, neonicotinoid insecticides have been the fastest growing class of insecticides in modern crop protection, with widespread use against a broad spectrum of sucking and certain chewing pests. As potent agonists, they act selectively on insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), their molecular target site. The discovery of neonicotinoids can be considered as a milestone in insecticide research and greatly facilitates the understanding of functional properties of the insect nAChRs. In this context, the crystal structure of the acetylcholine-binding proteins provides the theoretical foundation for designing homology models of the corresponding receptor ligand binding domains within the nAChRs, a useful basis for virtual screening of chemical libraries and rational design of novel insecticides acting on these practically relevant channels. Because of the relatively low risk for nontarget organisms and the environment, the high target specificity of neonicotinoid insecticides, and their versatility in application methods, this important class has to be maintained globally for integrated pest management strategies and insect resistance management programs. Innovative concepts for life-cycle management, jointly with the introduction of generic products, have made neonicotinoids the most important chemical class for the insecticide market.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neonicotinoids have been among the most popular and widely used pesticides around the world.
“In particular, neonicotinoids have been among the most popular and widely used pesticides around the world [12,13].”
From Development of hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for extraction of pesticides from aqueous environments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Advances in the control of (cat flea) on cats and dogs
RUST, M. (2005) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2005.03.010 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu, N. (., Baldé, A. B., Bertollini, R., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32345-0 · Cited by 4,929 · see citing works
Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
Woodcock, B. A., Isaac, N. J. B., Bullock, J. M., Roy, D. B., Garthwaite, D. G., Crowe, A., & Pywell, R. F. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12459 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Florindo, C., Branco, L. C., & Marrucho, I. M. (2017) · Fluid Phase Equilibria · doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2017.04.002 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Aldehyde Oxidase Importance In Vivo in Xenobiotic Metabolism: Imidacloprid Nitroreduction in Mice
Swenson, T. L., & Casida, J. E. (2013) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kft066 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Widespread agrochemicals differentially affect zooplankton biomass and community structure
Hébert, M., Fugère, V., Beisner, B. E., Barbosa da Costa, N., Barrett, R. D. H., Bell, G., Shapiro, B. J., Yargeau, V., Gonzalez, A., & Fussmann, G. F. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2423 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Neonicotinoids in U.S. maize: Insecticide substitution effects and environmental risk
Perry, E. D., & Moschini, G. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102320 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Pietrzak, D., Wątor, K., Pękała, D., Wójcik, J., Chochorek, A., Kmiecik, E., & Kania, J. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/03601234.2019.1574173 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jeschke, P., Nauen, R., Schindler, M., & Elbert, A.
- Affiliations
- Bayer (Germany) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jeschke, Peter
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-06-21
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2897-2908
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2077894786
- Cited by
- 1,867
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 190 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 198 · 2020: 179 · 2019: 154 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 29.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bayer
- Bayer CropScience
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Pesticide Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Keywords
- neonicotinoids, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, insecticide target sites, acetylcholine binding protein, virtual screening, integrated pest management, insecticide resistance management, crop protection, sucking pests
- MeSH terms
- Anabasine, Animals, Insecticide Resistance, Insecticides, Insecta, Models, Molecular, Receptors, Nicotinic, Seeds, Drug Design, Agrochemicals, Plant Components, Aerial, Chemical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review