The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glyphosate: environmental contamination, toxicity and potential risks to human health via food contamination
Open accessAbstract
Glyphosate has been the most widely used herbicide during the past three decades. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies glyphosate as ‘practically non-toxic and not an irritant’ under the acute toxicity classification system. This classification is based primarily on toxicity data and due to its unique mode of action via a biochemical pathway that only exists in a small number of organisms that utilise the shikimic acid pathway to produce amino acids, most of which are green plants. This classification is supported by the majority of scientific literature on the toxic effects of glyphosate. However, in 2005, the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) reported that glyphosate and its major metabolite, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), are of potential toxicological concern, mainly as a result of accumulation of residues in the food chain. The FAO further states that the dietary risk of glyphosate and AMPA is unlikely if the maximum daily intake of 1 mg kg−1 body weight (bw) is not exceeded. Research has now established that glyphosate can persist in the environment, and therefore, assessments of the health risks associated with glyphosate are more complicated than suggested by acute toxicity data that relate primarily to accidental high-rate exposure. We have used recent literature to assess the possible risks associated with the presence of glyphosate residues in food and the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Williams, G. M., Kroes, R., & Munro, I. C. (2000) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/rtph.1999.1371 · Cited by 864
RetractedGlyphosate induces human breast cancer cells growth via estrogen receptors
Thongprakaisang, S., Thiantanawat, A., Rangkadilok, N., Suriyo, T., & Satayavivad, J. (2013) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.057 · Cited by 424
Glyphosate impairs male offspring reproductive development by disrupting gonadotropin expression
Romano, M. A., Romano, R. M., Santos, L. D., Wisniewski, P., Campos, D. A., de Souza, P. B., Viau, P., Bernardi, M. M., Nunes, M. T., & de Oliveira, C. A. (2012) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-011-0788-9 · Cited by 196
Duke, S. O., Rimando, A. M., Pace, P. F., Reddy, K. N., & Smeda, R. J. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf025908i · Cited by 195
Cited by
Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate
Van Bruggen, A. H. C., He, M. M., Shin, K., Mai, V., Jeong, K. C., Finckh, M. R., & Morris, J. G. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309 · Cited by 992
Glyphosate: Its Environmental Persistence and Impact on Crop Health and Nutrition
Kanissery, R., Gairhe, B., Kadyampakeni, D., Batuman, O., & Alferez, F. (2019) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants8110499 · Cited by 299
Meftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A., & Megharaj, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, S. H., & Ogbourne, S. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Published
- 2016-08-19
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 18988-19001
- ISSN
- 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7499
- OpenAlex
- W2507679967
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glyphosate: environmental contamination, toxicity and potential risks to human health via food contamination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11356-016-7425-3
- The paper
- Bai, S. H., & Ogbourne, S. M. (2016). Glyphosate: environmental contamination, toxicity and potential risks to human health via food contamination. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7425-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.