Cited by 48Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSmoking Behavior and CessationPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Association between postnatal second-hand smoke exposure and ADHD in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Huang, Anyan, Wu, Kusheng, Cai, Zemin, Lin, Yuhang, Zhang, Xuanzhi, Huang, Yanhong·2021·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder which is caused by the interplay of genetic and environmental risk factors such as second-hand smoke (SHS). The association between postnatal exposure to SHS and ADHD risk in children was still inconclusive. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the definite association. We searched for relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and Web of Science databases up to January 2020. We used random effect models to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses and sensitive analyses were also performed to solve the heterogeneity. According to our inclusion criteria, 9 studies including 6 cross-sectional studies, 2 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study were included in the final analysis. Postnatal exposure to SHS increased the risk of ADHD in children (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.37-1.87). Children who exposed to SHS were found a slight risk for conduct problems (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00-1.77). Among the studies which used cotinine as a biomarker for SHS exposure, a lower pooled OR (OR = 1.16, 95%CI = 1.01, 1.33) was observed between cotinine and ADHD in children. Our meta-analysis results suggested that SHS exposure may be a risk factor for ADHD. We also found that SHS exposure may be associated with some adverse behavioral outcomes. More prospective studies should be conducted to confirm the relationship between SHS exposure and ADHD in childre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-020-11269-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, A., Wu, K., Cai, Z., Lin, Y., Zhang, X., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
Shantou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Kusheng
  • Huang, Yanhong
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
1370-1380
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W3094610675
Cited by
48
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Yanhong Huang, M.D (190827075265313, 190823105264087, 2019ST005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
passive smoking, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, postnatal exposure, environmental risk factors, conduct problems, cotinine, biomarkers of exposure, neurodevelopmental disorders
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Prospective Studies, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review