Cited by 51Biofuel production and bioconversionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 247 of the 247 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An updated review on advancement in fermentative production strategies for biobutanol using Clostridium spp.

Vamsi Krishna, Kondapalli, Bharathi, Natarajan, George Shiju, Shon, Alagesan Paari, Kuppusamy, Malaviya, Alok·2022·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

A significant concern of our fuel-dependent era is the unceasing exhaustion of petroleum fuel supplies. In parallel to this, environmental issues such as the greenhouse effect, change in global climate, and increasing global temperature must be addressed on a priority basis. Biobutanol, which has fuel characteristics comparable to gasoline, has attracted global attention as a viable green fuel alternative among the many biofuel alternatives. Renewable biomass could be used for the sustainable production of biobutanol by the acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) pathway. Non-extinguishable resources, such as algal and lignocellulosic biomass, and starch are some of the most commonly used feedstock for fermentative production of biobutanol, and each has its particular set of advantages. Clostridium, a gram-positive endospore-forming bacterium that can produce a range of compounds, along with n-butanol is traditionally known for its biobutanol production capabilities. Clostridium fermentation produces biobased n-butanol through ABE fermentation. However, low butanol titer, a lack of suitable feedstock, and product inhibition are the primary difficulties in biobutanol synthesis. Critical issues that are essential for sustainable production of biobutanol include (i) developing high butanol titer producing strains utilizing genetic and metabolic engineering approaches, (ii) renewable biomass that could be used for biobutanol production at a larger scale, and (iii) addressing the limits of traditional batch fermentation by integrated bioprocessing technologies with effective product recovery procedures that have increased the efficiency of biobutanol synthesis. Our paper reviews the current progress in all three aspects of butanol production and presents recent data on current practices in fermentative biobutanol production technology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-022-20637-9

Cites

247 of 247 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 247 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Kujawski W (2000) Application of pervaporation and vapor permeation in environmental protection. Polish J Environ Stud 9:13–26
  2. Madihah MS, Ariff AB, Sahaid KM, Suraini AA, Karim MIA (2001) Direct fermentation of gelatinized sago starch to acetone-butanol-ethanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:567–576. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012351112351 · DOI
  3. Mutschlechner O, Swoboda H, Gapes JR (2000) Continuous two-stage ABE-fermentation using Clostridium beijerinckii HRRL B592 operating with a growth rate in the first stage vessel close to its maximal value. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2:101–105
  4. Nishimasu H, Ann Ran F, Hsu PD, Konermann S, ShehataDohmae SN, Ishitani R, Zhang F, Nureki O (2014) Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156:935–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001.Crystal · DOI
  5. Pasteur L (1861a) Expériences et vues nouvelles sur la nature des fermentations. C R Acad Sci 52:1260–1264
  6. Pasteur L (1861b) Animalcules infusoires vivant sans gaz oxygène libre et déterminant des fermentations. C R Hebd Stances Acad Sci 52:344–347
  7. Qureshi N, Ezeji TC (2008) Butanol, ‘a superior biofuel’ production from agricultural residues (renewable biomass): recent progress in technology. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 6:319–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb · DOI
  8. Sarkar Begum YD (2015) Enhanced biobutanol production using novel clostridial fusants in simultaneous saccharifi cation and fermentation of green renewable agriculture residues. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 9:529–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb · DOI
  9. Yamano T, Nishimasu H, Zetsche B et al (2016) Crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 165:949–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003.Crystal · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vamsi Krishna, K., Bharathi, N., George Shiju, S., Alagesan Paari, K., & Malaviya, A.
Affiliations
Christ University (IN)
Corresponding author
Malaviya, Alok
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2022-05-13
Volume
29
Issue
32
Pages
47988-48019
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W4280527367
Cited by
51
References
247
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
biobutanol, Clostridium, acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation, n-butanol, biofuels, lignocellulosic biomass, algal biomass, product inhibition, metabolic engineering, genetic engineering, product recovery, batch fermentation
MeSH terms
Butanols, Clostridium, Fermentation, Temperature, 1-Butanol, Biodiversity, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review