The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond
Ragin, C. C. (2008) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001 · Cited by 4,445
Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers
Chesbrough, H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 · Cited by 3,850
Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond
Ragin, C. C. (2008) · Cited by 3,398
Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139004244 · Cited by 2,862
Lieberson, S., & Ragin, C. C. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089736 · Cited by 2,799
The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies.
Smith, H. L., & Ragin, C. C. (1990) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1972971 · Cited by 2,779
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Cited by
Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice
Dul, J., Hauff, S., & Bouncken, R. B. (2023) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-023-00628-x · Cited by 325
Gerrits, L., & Pagliarin, S. (2021) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1799636 · Cited by 65
CONFIGURATIONS OF KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS
ALVES, A. C., FISCHER, B., VONORTAS, N. S., & QUEIROZ, S. R. R. D. (2019) · Revista de Administração de Empresas · doi:10.1590/s0034-759020190403 · Cited by 36
Ding, N., Chen, M., & Hu, L. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105709 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M.
- Venue
- International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
- Published
- 2017-07-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-33
- ISSN
- 1554-7191 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-1938
- OpenAlex
- W2732682163
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 123
- FWCI
- 93.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
- The paper
- Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
