Cited by 36Environmental Impact and SustainabilityEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyChemistry and Chemical Engineering

USEtox characterisation factors for textile chemicals based on a transparent data source selection strategy

Open access
Roos, Sandra, Holmquist, Hanna, Jönsson, Christina, Arvidsson, Rickard·2018·The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract

Life cycle assessments (LCAs) of textile products which do not include the use and emission of textile chemicals, such as dyes, softeners and water-repellent agents, will give non-comprehensive results for the toxicity impact potential. The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to provide a set of characterisation factors (CFs) for some of the most common textile chemicals and (2) to propose a data source selection strategy in order to increase transparency when calculating new CFs. A set of 72 common textile-related substances was matched with the USEtox 2.01, USEtox 1.01 and the COSMEDE databases in order to investigate coverage and coherence. For the 25 chemicals that did not already have established CFs in any of these databases, new CFs were calculated. A data source selection strategy was developed and followed in order to ensure consistency and transparency, and USEtox 2.01 was used for calculations. The parameters that caused the most uncertainty were identified during the modelling and strategies for handling them were developed. Of the 72 textile-related substances, 48 already had calculated recommended or indicative CFs in existing databases, which showed good coherence. The main uncertainty identified during the calculation of 25 new CFs was the selection of input data regarding toxicity and degradation in water. However, for substances such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), the acid dissociation constant (pKa) and partitioning coefficients (K ow and KOC) also require special considerations. Other input parameters had less than one order of magnitude impact on the CF result for essentially all substances. The paper presents a strategy for how to provide a complete set of toxicity CFs for a given list of substances. In addition, such a set of CFs for common textile-related substances is presented. The data source selection strategy provides a structured and transparent way of calculating additional CFs for textile chemicals with USEtox. Consequently, this study can help future LCA studies to provide relevant guidance towards environmentally benign chemical management in the textile industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-017-1330-y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aronson D, Boethling R, Howard P, Stiteler W (2006) Estimating bio- degradation half-lives for use in chemical screening. Chemosphere 63(11):1953-1960. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.044 · DOI
  2. Boxall ABA, Sinclair CJ, Fenner K, Kolpin D, Maund S (2004) When synthetic chemicals degrade in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 38(19):368A-375A
  3. ECHA (2013) C&L Inventory database. Retrieved from http://echa. europa.eu/web/guest/information-onchemicals/cl-inventory- database ECHA (2014) Illustrative examples with the OECD QSAR Toolbox workflow. Helsinki, Finland EFSA (2016) EFSA Open Food Tox. Retrieved June 25, 2016, from http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/publications/efsajournal European Commission (2003) Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) reference document on best available techniques for the textiles industry. European IPPC Bureau, Seville European Commission (2006) Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH), establishing a European chemicals agency, amending directive 1999/45/E. Off J Eur Union L396:0001-0851 European Commission (2010) International reference life cycle data sys- tem (ILCD) handbook-general guide for life cycle assessment- detailed guidance, 1st ed. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. doi:10.2788/38479 European Commission (2011) International reference life cycle data sys- tem (ILCD) handbook-recommendations for life cycle impact as- sessment in the European context, 1st ed. EUR 24571 EN. Publications Office of the Europe, Luxemburg. doi:10.2788/33030 European Commission (2013) Commission recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisa- tions (2013/179/EU). Off. J. Eur. Union 56 · DOI
  4. Maillard E, Hugonnot O, Roussel C (2013) International LCA Conference 2013, BUSEtox COSMEDE footprinting^: a web platform environ- mental footprinting of cosmetics and detergents for the 1-5
  5. Mackay D, Shiu WY, Ma K, Lee SC (2006) Properties and Environmental Fate Second Edition Introduction and Hydrocarbons. Chemphyschem A European Journal Of Chemical Physics And Physical Chemistry (Vol. III). Retrieved from http:// www.crcnetbase.com/doi/book/10.1201/9781420044393 · DOI
  6. Weed DL (2005) Weight of evidence: a review of concept and methods. Risk Anal 25:1545-1557
  7. Zhuravskii S, Yukina G, Kulikova O, Panevin A, Tomson V, Korolev D, Galagudza M (2016) Mast cell accumulation precedes tissue fibrosis induced by intravenously administered amorphous silica nanoparti- cles. Toxicol Mech Methods 26(4). doi:10.3109/15376516.2016. 1169341 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roos, S., Holmquist, H., Jönsson, C., & Arvidsson, R.
Affiliations
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Roos, Sandra
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
890-903
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
OpenAlex
W2621107742
Cited by
36
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning (Mistra Future Fashion)
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (SUPFES)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Keywords
USEtox, characterization factors, textile chemicals, textile dyes, textile softeners, water repellent agents, data source selection, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, acid dissociation constants, partition coefficient, uncertainty analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review