Cited by 74Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityService and Product Innovation

Is Prolonging the Lifetime of Passive Durable Products a Low-Hanging Fruit of a Circular Economy? A Multiple Case Study

Open access
Kaddoura, Mohamad, Kambanou, Marianna Lena, Tillman, Anne-Marie, Sakao, Tomohiko·2019·Sustainability

Abstract

Extending the lifetime of passive products, i.e., products that do not consume materials or energy during the use phase, by implementing product-service systems (PSS) has a potential to reduce the environmental impact while being an attractive and straightforward measure for companies to implement. This research assesses the viability of introducing PSS for passive products, by documenting five real product cases of prolonging the lifetime through repair or refurbishment and by quantifying, through life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC), the change in environmental and economic outcome. The environmental impact (measured as global warming potential over the life cycle) was reduced for all cases because extraction and production dominated the impact. This reduction was 45–72% for most cases and mainly influenced by the number of reuses and the relative environmental burden of the components whose lifetime was prolonged. The costs for the company (measured as LCC from the manufacturer’s perspective) decreased too by 8–37%. The main reason that costs reduced less than the environmental impact is that some costs have no equivalent in LCA, e.g., administration and labor costs for services. The decreases in both LCA and LCC results, as well as the willingness of the companies to implement the changes, demonstrate that this measure can be financially attractive for companies to implement and effectively contribute to a circular economy.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This multiple case study assesses whether prolonging the lifetime of passive durable products through product-service systems (PSS) is a viable circular-economy measure. Across five real cases at three Swedish companies, circular repair/refurbishment offerings reduced both environmental impact and manufacturer life cycle costs, though cost savings were smaller than environmental gains.

Key findings

  • Environmental impact, measured as global warming potential (GWP), was reduced in all cases; reductions were 45–72% for most cases, with the waste inlet being the exception at only 1% GWP reduction for the full system.
  • Manufacturer life cycle costs (LCC) decreased in all cases, by 8–37%; examples include 12–18% for the beach flag and event tent, 9% for the recycling bin, 37% for the locker, and 12% for the waste inlet.
  • Cost reductions were less pronounced than environmental reductions because labor-related costs such as administration, design and development, marketing and sales, and distribution have no equivalent environmental burden in LCA and often did not decrease.
  • Sensitivity analyses showed most environmental benefits for the beach flag and event tent were obtained after 4–5 uses; for the recycling bin, up to 35 repair cycles were environmentally beneficial versus replacement, but costs allowed only two repair cycles before replacement was preferable; for the locker, breakeven occurred at five refurbishments for GWP and four for LCC.

Methods

  • Multiple case study of five passive durable products from three Swedish companies: beach flag and event tent (Company A), recycling bin and locker (Company B), and waste inlet (Company C). Each circular offering used product-oriented or use-oriented PSS and was compared with a business-as-usual product sales offering.
  • Environmental assessment used LCA according to ISO 14040:2006, modeled in OpenLCA with Ecoinvent 3.3 and textile data from Roos et al.; CML midpoint categories included GWP, acidification potential, and eutrophication potential, with GWP used for dominant-phase conclusions.
  • Economic assessment used LCC from the manufacturer’s perspective according to IEC 60300-3-3:2017, with company-provided cost data and expert estimates where historic data were unavailable; no discounting was done due to relatively short product lifetimes. Sensitivity analyses varied reuse, repair, or refurbishment counts.

Limitations

  • The paper states data gaps for textile components: due to lack of high-quality data on textile chemicals, no toxicity impact assessment was done, so the environmental impact of textiles is probably underestimated and the improvement potential of the circular alternative may be overestimated.
  • The paper states LCC results are subject to uncertainties from insufficient data, such as lifetime and cost estimations, though these were minimized by the relatively short product lifetimes and company data quality.
  • The paper states that cost alone does not fully portray financial or business implications: revenues, dispersion of financial flows over time, effects on other supply-chain actors, customer willingness to pay, cumulative effects across multiple products, and rebound effects were not fully assessed; the cases are also simple and do not require extensive supply-chain changes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11184819

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

18 of 63 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Not every PSS contributes to a circular economy.

    “Although the idea is simple, it is noted in literature that not every PSS contributes to a CE, e.g., [6]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Kjaer, 2019, Product/Service-Systems for a Circular Economy: The Route to Decoupling Economic Growth from Resource Consumption?, J. Ind. Ecol. source

      The available Abstract-labelled passages contain keywords and bibliographic information, but no substantive statement about whether every PSS contributes to a circular economy. Searches for that claim and for related points about resource savings and rebound effects found no passage that addresses it. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Redesigning company offerings toward PSS is not without challenges.

    “However, redesigning company offerings toward PSS in not without challenges [38,39]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [38] Martinez, 2010, Challenges in transforming manufacturing organisations into product-service providers, J. Manufact. Technol. Manag. source
    • cites [39] Matschewsky, 2018, Designing and providing integrated product-service systems–challenges, opportunities and solutions resulting from prescriptive approaches in two industrial companies, Int. J. Prod. Res. source
  • Premisereasoning

    Extending the lifetime of passive durable products has high potential for environmental improvement.

    “the extension of the lifetime of passive durable products, i.e., products that do not consume energy or materials during the use phase, has been found by researchers to have high potential [18][19][20].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Willskytt, 2019, Resource efficiency of consumables–Life cycle assessment of incontinence products, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. source

      The Introduction describes longevity strategies for durable products, and the Conclusions report substantial environmental savings from reusing part of an incontinence product. The paper does not establish that extending the lifetime of passive durable products specifically has high environmental-improvement potential; its reusable product requires washing and drying between uses. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Iraldo, 2017, Is product durability better for environment and for economic efficiency? A comparative assessment applying LCA and LCC to two energy-intensive products, J. Clean. Prod. source
    • cites [20] Cooper, 2017, The environmental impacts of reuse: A review, J. Ind. Ecol. source
  • Premisecitation

    For a PSS to contribute to a circular economy, it must be an attractive business for companies so that it actually gets implemented.

    “The first is that a PSS, or other circular measure, must be an attractive business for companies so that it actually gets implemented [11][12][13]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Kirchherr, 2018, Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU), Ecol. Econ. source
    • cites [12] Babbitt, 2018, Closing the loop on circular economy research: From theory to practice and back again, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. source
    • cites [13] Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod. source
  • Premisecitation

    The higher the level of integration of the product and the service, e.g., result-oriented versus product-oriented, the more change within the company is required to do it successfully.

    “the higher the level of integration of the product and the service, e.g., result-oriented versus product-oriented, the more change within the company is required to do it successfully [40].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Bigdeli, 2018, Measuring servitization progress and outcome: The case of ‘advanced services’, Prod. Plan. Control source

      The Introduction describes substantial organisational change needed to deliver advanced services, including a service function, new sales capabilities and wider organisational integration. It distinguishes advanced services from product-support and base services, but does not state that each higher level of product–service integration requires more change, or compare result-oriented with product-oriented offerings. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 43
  • May combine two claims. 42
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Companies often perceive circular economy strategies as too risky and lacking economic viability.

    “and that they often perceive CE strategies as too risky and lacking economic viability [11,14,15].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Kirchherr, 2018, Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU), Ecol. Econ. source
    • cites [14] Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van Der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., and Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. (2016). Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8. source

      The Literature Review (section 2; page not provided) says that limited examples of successful circular business models create uncertainty, and that upfront costs and payback periods are important concerns for SMEs. It does not establish that companies often regard circular economy strategies as too risky or economically unviable; those conclusions are stronger and broader than the passages support. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [15] Mont, O., Plepys, A., Whalen, K., and Nußholz, J.L. (2019, June 15). Business Model Innovation for a Circular Economy: Drivers and Barriers for the Swedish Industry—The Voice of REES Companies. Available online: http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/833402ef-b4d4-4541-a10e-34d1e89d2146.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    For a PSS to contribute to a circular economy, it must contribute at least to relative resource decoupling.

    “and the second is that it must contribute at least to relative resource decoupling [6].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Kjaer, 2019, Product/Service-Systems for a Circular Economy: The Route to Decoupling Economic Growth from Resource Consumption?, J. Ind. Ecol. source

      The available passages labeled Abstract list circular economy, decoupling, and PSS as keywords, but do not state that relative resource decoupling is a minimum requirement for a PSS to contribute to a circular economy. Searches for “relative resource decoupling” and paraphrases of the requirement returned no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Companies lack willingness, awareness, and resources to engage with circular economy.

    “A common major finding in this literature is that companies lack willingness, awareness, and resources to engage with CE”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Kirchherr, 2018, Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU), Ecol. Econ. source

      Section 4.1 identifies hesitant company culture as a major barrier, supporting the point about companies’ willingness to engage with CE. But its finding about lacking interest and awareness concerns consumers, not companies. Section 4.2 reports high upfront investment costs while saying funding is available and limited funding ranks only tenth, so a general lack of company resources overstates the finding. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van Der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., and Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. (2016). Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8. source
    • cites [15] Mont, O., Plepys, A., Whalen, K., and Nußholz, J.L. (2019, June 15). Business Model Innovation for a Circular Economy: Drivers and Barriers for the Swedish Industry—The Voice of REES Companies. Available online: http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/833402ef-b4d4-4541-a10e-34d1e89d2146.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Achieving resource reduction and avoiding burden shifting between life cycle stages is not enough to decouple economic growth from resource consumption.

    “according to Kjaer, Pigosso, Niero, Bech, and McAloone [6], achieving resource reduction and avoiding burden shifting between life cycle stages is not enough to decouple economic growth from resource consumption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Kjaer, 2019, Product/Service-Systems for a Circular Economy: The Route to Decoupling Economic Growth from Resource Consumption?, J. Ind. Ecol. source

      The available indexed passages contain the paper’s title and bibliographic metadata, but no discussion of whether resource reduction and avoiding burden shifting are sufficient for decoupling. Searches for the claim’s wording and for those concepts returned no substantive passage, so the attribution cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Textile chemicals are known as important contributors to the environmental impact of textiles.

    “despite the fact that textile chemicals are known as important contributors to the environmental impact of textiles [58].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] Roos, 2018, USEtox characterisation factors for textile chemicals based on a transparent data source selection strategy, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The event tent and beach flag are often used for one event only before EOL.

    “Two products were selected, an event tent and a beach flag (Figure 1), which are often used for one event only before EOL.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The environmental impacts of distribution were negligible, whereas the distribution cost was a high flat cost, regardless of whether the whole recycling bin was delivered in the BAU offering, or only the lids during repair in the circular offering.

    “The environmental impacts of distribution were negligible, whereas the distribution cost was a high flat cost, regardless of whether the whole recycling bin was delivered in the BAU offering, or only the lids during repair in the circular offering.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the circular offering, the ownership of the flag is retained by Company A, which leases it to the customer for one event and collects it.

    “In the circular offering, the ownership of the flag is, instead, retained by Company A, which leases it to the customer for one event and collects it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    One of the companies occasionally incurs a maintenance cost for personnel travel to a site to survey and assess potential maintenance needs.

    “However, one of the companies occasionally incurs a maintenance cost for personnel travel to a site to survey and assess potential maintenance needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BAU offering's production-related costs (Production D and Production R) were only 44% for the bin, whereas they were 68% for the locker.

    “The BAU offering's production-related costs (Production D and Production R) were only 44% for the bin, whereas they were 68% for the locker.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Company A refurbishes the flag by reusing the pole and cross-base and replacing the textile, which is customized for each event.

    “Company A then refurbishes the product by reusing the pole and cross-base and replacing the textile, which is customized for each event.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    At the warehouse, the components are equipped with textile parts, also from China, and distributed to customers.

    “At the warehouse, the components are equipped with textile parts, also from China, and distributed to customers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In order to prolong product lifetime, all offerings required changes to products and, in some cases, also to the business model.

    “In order to prolong product lifetime, all offerings required changes to products and, in some cases, also to the business model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The estimated lifetime of the locker is 10 years, and the main reason for replacing it is related to design and fashion considerations.

    “The estimated lifetime of the locker is 10 years, and the main reason for replacing it is related to design and fashion considerations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The costs related to design and development and marketing and sales were mainly labor costs.

    “It should also be noted that the costs related to design and development and marketing and sales were mainly labor costs, which have no equivalent environmental burdens in LCA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The current estimated average lifetime of the bin is 7.5 years, after which it is disposed of mainly because the lid becomes battered.

    “The current estimated average lifetime of the bin is 7.5 years, after which it is disposed of mainly because the lid becomes battered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In the BAU offering, a flag is sold to the user who disposes of it after its first use.

    “In the BAU offering, a flag is sold to the user who disposes of it after its first use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The cost savings were greater for the locker (37%) than for the recycling bin (9%), while the environmental improvement measured as GWP for the circular offering was considerable for both products (47% and 38% for the locker and bin, respectively).

    “The cost savings were greater for the locker (37%) than for the recycling bin (9%), while the environmental improvement measured as GWP for the circular offering was considerable for both products (47% and 38% for the locker and bin, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The metal parts would be sent to recycling, and the wood parts would be sent to incineration at the EOL of the product.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The products in the present study were passive, so the operation had neither a cost nor an environmental burden for, e.g., use of energy or auxiliary materials.

    “Since the products in the present study were passive, the operation had neither a cost nor an environmental burden for, e.g., use of energy or auxiliary materials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both products received a major contribution to GWP from Production D of durable components in the BAU offering (96% and 52% for the bin and the locker, respectively) and less for Production R (3% and 34% for the bin and the locker, respectively).

    “Similar to Company A, both products received a major contribution to GWP from Production D of durable components in the BAU offering (96% and 52% for the bin and the locker, respectively) and less for Production R (3% and 34% for the bin and the locker, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The metal parts would be sent to recycling, and the wood parts would be sent to incineration at the EOL of the product.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The beach flag is a 410 cm tall flag with a pole made of a fiberglass composite, a steel cross-base, and a textile of 72 × 360 cm attached to the pole.

    “The beach flag is a 410 cm tall flag with a pole made of a fiberglass composite, a steel cross-base, and a textile of 72 × 360 cm attached to the pole.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    For the event tent, the durable aluminum frame and steel weights are reused, while the textile is changed during refurbishment.

    “The concept is similar for the event tent; the durable aluminum frame and steel weights are reused, while the textile is changed during refurbishment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The refurbishment of the products takes place in Sweden.

    “The refurbishment of the products takes place in Sweden.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Although all products were passive, they varied with respect to complexity (number of components and materials) and lifetime.

    “Although all products were passive, they varied with respect to complexity (number of components and materials) and lifetime.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The event tent consists of a 300 × 345 × 300 cm aluminum frame covered on three sides and on the top with textile, and it is supported with steel weights.

    “The event tent consists of a 300 × 345 × 300 cm aluminum frame covered on three sides and on the top with textile, and it is supported with steel weights.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The lifetime of the products was fairly short.

    “Since the lifetime of the products was fairly short, no discounting was done for costs that occur in the future (e.g., maintenance, repair, and end-of-life).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The manufacturing of the metal components takes place in China, from where they are transported to a warehouse in Sweden.

    “The manufacturing of the metal components takes place in China, from where they are transported to a warehouse in Sweden.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The lid was estimated to be changed twice during the 15-year lifetime.

    “The lid was estimated to be changed twice during the 15-year lifetime.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Production of the event tent components that were reused (aluminum and steel) dominated the environmental impact, but the textile component, which was replaced for every use cycle, was more expensive and reduced the potential for cost savings.

    “For example, production of the event tent components that were reused (aluminum and steel) dominated the environmental impact, but the textile component, which was replaced for every use cycle, was more expensive and, consequently, reduced the potential for cost savings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Production costs for the components whose lifetime is prolonged are substantial in the BAU scenario, but they do not dominate costs to the same extent as they do environmental impact.

    “Although production costs for the components whose lifetime is prolonged are substantial in the BAU scenario, they do not dominate costs to the same extent as they do environmental impact.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the waste inlet, emissions from transportation during the maintenance phase accounted for almost half of the GWP impact, while most of the other half was derived from the production of steel for the inlet body, which was equal in both offerings.

    “The emissions incurred from transportation during the maintenance phase accounted for almost half of the impact in GWP, while most of the other half was derived from the production of steel for the inlet body (Production D in Figure 8c), which was equal in both offerings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the locker, the breakeven point occurred at five refurbishments for GWP and four refurbishments for LCCman.

    “For the locker, the GWP and the LCC man results (Figure 6c,d, respectively) are in line with each other, and the breakeven point occurred at five (5) and four (4) refurbishments, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    For the waste inlet, the repair cost decreased from 18% to 6%, while the GWP decreased from 2% to 0.5%.

    “In addition, the repair cost decreased significantly more than the related environmental impacts (costs were reduced from 18% to 6%, while the GWP was reduced from 2% to 0.5%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Implementing the circular offering for the waste inlet concerned Production S, and Production S made a low contribution to the total GWP of the inlet.

    “Implementing the circular offering concerned Production S, and Production S made a low contribution to the total GWP of the inlet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the waste inlet, the circular offering decreased LCCman by 12% and GWP by 1% compared to BAU.

    “Starting with the overall system, LCC man decreased by 12%, whereas the GWP decreased by only 1%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The maintenance cost for Company C occurred regardless of production and whether a door was damaged or not.

    “Not only did this cost occur regardless of the production, it also occurred whether a door was damaged or not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Cost reductions were less pronounced than environmental improvements and ranged from 8% to 37%.

    “However, cost reductions were less pronounced than environmental improvements and ranged from 8% to 37%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Companies A and B said that they were either going to or were considering reducing the prices of the circular offerings compared to the BAU to stimulate demand.

    “Companies A and B said that they were either going to or were considering reducing the prices of the circular offerings compared to the BAU to stimulate demand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Companies A and B did not expect that their current customer base would increase their demand.

    “They could not predict whether new customers would be sourced from competitors' market share or whether the size of the market would increase, but they did not expect that their current customer base would increase their demand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The cases in this research are simple and do not require extensive changes to the companies' supply chains.

    “The cases in this research are simple and do not require extensive changes to the companies' supply chains, but many CE measures need to be implemented as part of innovation ecosystems or coordinated action of global supply chains in order to be economically viable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Companies A and B could not predict whether new customers would be sourced from competitors' market share or whether the size of the market would increase.

    “They could not predict whether new customers would be sourced from competitors' market share or whether the size of the market would increase, but they did not expect that their current customer base would increase their demand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PSS has gained traction with companies because it can give them a competitive advantage, better customer knowledge, and new sources of income.

    “PSS has gained traction with companies because it can give them a competitive advantage, better customer knowledge, and new sources of income [35][36][37].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35] Sakao, 2007, Service Engineering: A novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product, J. Clean. Prod. source
    • cites [36] Meier, 2010, Industrial product-service systems—IPS2, CIRP Ann. source
    • cites [37] Masood, 2015, Integrating through-life engineering service knowledge with product design and manufacture, Int. J. Comp. Integr. Manufact. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Achieving lifetime extension of passive durable products through PSS theoretically holds water, as PSS has great potential to contribute to environmental impact reduction and can be a profitable proposition.

    “Therefore, achieving lifetime extension of passive durable products through PSS, which has great potential to contribute to environmental impact reduction and can be a profitable proposition, theoretically holds water.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Lifetime extension is only valid when the avoided impacts from production are lower than the impacts from producing more durable components or treating the returned product to extend its lifetime.

    “lifetime extension is only valid when the avoided impacts from production, e.g., energy use and the subsequent reduction in impact upstream such as raw material extraction and transportation, are lower than the impacts from producing more durable components or treating the returned product to extend its lifetime [20,26].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] Cooper, 2017, The environmental impacts of reuse: A review, J. Ind. Ecol. source
    • cites [26] Allwood, 2011, Material efficiency: A white paper, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    For companies, their offerings need to be financially viable.

    “For companies, however, decreasing the environmental impacts associated with their products is only one part of their motivation; the offerings also need to be financially viable [34].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Laasch, O., and Conaway, R. (2017). Responsible Business: The Textbook for Management Learning, Competence and Innovation, Routledge. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In PSS literature, the initial focus was on PSS's potential to bring about joint environmental and economic benefits through the integration of products and services, but in its evolution, the focus lies mainly on the attributes of PSS as a competitive business strategy.

    “Although one of the initial foci in PSS literature has been its potential to bring about joint environmental and economic benefits through the integration of products and services, in its evolution, the focus lies mainly on the attributes of PSS as a competitive business strategy [7].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Tukker, 2015, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy—A review, J. Clean. Prod. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    PSS could support the economic viability of lifetime prolongation.

    “PSS, which advocates the addition or integration of services with a product, could support the economic viability of lifetime prolongation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    For companies, decreasing the environmental impacts associated with their products is only one part of their motivation.

    “For companies, however, decreasing the environmental impacts associated with their products is only one part of their motivation; the offerings also need to be financially viable [34].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Laasch, O., and Conaway, R. (2017). Responsible Business: The Textbook for Management Learning, Competence and Innovation, Routledge. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For larger products, the share of production-related costs of the component whose lifetime is prolonged becomes more dominant than the labor-related costs, which results in greater potential for savings.

    “For larger products, the share of production-related costs of the component whose lifetime is prolonged becomes more dominant than the labor-related costs, which results in greater potential for savings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The durable components of the beach flag and event tent were reused 9 times during product lifetime.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The tools most often used for joint assessment are LCA and LCC.

    “The tools most often used for joint assessment are LCA and LCC, e.g., [24].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Lindahl, 2014, Environmental and economic benefits of Integrated Product Service Offerings quantified with real business cases, J. Clean. Prod. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is a lack of assessment studies of real industrial cases, and most of what can be found in literature is based on theoretical cases.

    “Further, there is a lack of assessment studies of real industrial cases, and most of what can be found in literature is based on theoretical cases [41].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Brandão, M., Lazaveric, D., and Finnveden, G. (2020). What circular economy measures fit what kind of product?. The Handbook of the Circular Economy, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The fixed labor costs (design and development and marketing and sales costs) and the high cost of the textiles (for the spare parts) explain the limited rate of decrease in LCC man.

    “This is explained by the fixed labor costs, i.e., design and development and marketing and sales costs, limiting the decrease, and the high cost of the textiles (for the spare parts).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The interactions with companies cannot be broken down into measurable events, but they contributed to analyzing the results and to understanding the economic viability of the products beyond life cycle costs as well as some of the potential rebound effects of the more circular offerings.

    “These interactions cannot be broken down into measurable events, as they included meetings, emails, and telephone calls, but the interactions contributed to analyzing the results and to understanding the economic viability of the products beyond life cycle costs as well as some of the potential rebound effects of the more circular offerings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Three reasons for the difference in the reduction of the LCC man and LCA can be discerned from these results; namely, (i) distribution costs, (ii) costs and environmental impacts of the dominant phase, and (iii) costs not related to production.

    “Three reasons for the difference in the reduction of the LCC man and LCA can be discerned from these results; namely, (i) distribution costs, (ii) costs and environmental impacts of the dominant phase, and (iii) costs not related to production.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The metal parts would be sent to recycling, and the wood parts would be sent to incineration at the EOL of the product.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The higher the share of production-related costs of the component whose lifetime is prolonged (and, correspondingly, the lower the costs not related to production), the higher the potential for savings, thus making the circular option economically viable.

    “This limited the potential for cost reductions for the bin and again demonstrates that the higher the share of production-related costs of the component whose lifetime is prolonged (and, correspondingly, the lower the costs not related to production), the higher the potential for savings, thus making the circular option economically viable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a need to go beyond theory and quantitatively assess the benefits, or the lack of them, in real case studies, both from the perspective of the environment and from the perspective of the companies that are actually bringing offerings to the market.

    “Therefore, there is a need to go beyond theory and quantitatively assess the benefits, or the lack of them, in real case studies, both from the perspective of the environment and from the perspective of the companies that are actually bringing offerings to the market.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    From an environmental perspective, the component being replaced when the tent is refurbished (textile) carries a larger share of the GWP, compared to the flag, which is why the relative environmental gains were greater for the flag.

    “On the other hand, from an environmental perspective, the component being replaced when the tent is refurbished (textile) carries a larger share of the GWP, compared to the flag, which is why the relative environmental gains were greater for the flag.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The durable components of the beach flag and event tent were reused 9 times during product lifetime.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A lot of research in the circular economy field is either qualitative or focuses on the environmental perspective.

    “A lot of research in the circular economy field is either qualitative or focuses on the environmental perspective [13].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Multiple cases give a stronger base for theory building as well as context for research.

    “Multiple cases were used because they give a stronger base for theory building as well as context for research [45].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Eisenhardt, 2007, Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges, Acad. Manag. J. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Design changes can reduce material cost and, more importantly, labor costs, which were identified as a major cost driver.

    “However, design changes can reduce material cost, but more importantly, labor costs, which were identified as a major cost driver.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other authors have demonstrated that extending the lifetime of products can reduce life cycle costs.

    “Other authors have also demonstrated that extending the lifetime of products can reduce life cycle costs, e.g., [24].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Lindahl, 2014, Environmental and economic benefits of Integrated Product Service Offerings quantified with real business cases, J. Clean. Prod. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Better environmental performance could possibly increase customer willingness to pay.

    “On the other hand, better environmental performance could possibly increase customer willingness to pay, as well as, possibly more importantly to companies, dealings with the same provider instead of investing time and money searching for a new provider will ease the business [35,63].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [35] Sakao, 2007, Service Engineering: A novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product, J. Clean. Prod. source
    • cites [63] Sakao, 2009, Quality engineering for early stage of environmentally conscious design, TQM J. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For the waste inlet, a similar analogy applies to LCCman, with the difference that the cost of producing the door had a larger share in LCCman.

    “Almost the same analogy can be applied to the LCC man , the difference being that the cost of producing the door had a larger share in LCC man .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Both the BAU and circular offerings for the waste inlet extend the lifetime of the system through repair but differ with respect to how large a component is replaced at repair.

    “Both the BAU and circular offerings extend the lifetime of the system through repair but differ with respect to how large a component is replaced at repair.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Customers may perceive circular products as not new and, hence, of less value, and therefore may not be willing to pay the same price as for a new item.

    “Customers may perceive circular products as not new and, hence, of less value [57], and therefore not be willing to pay the same price as for a new item.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The decrease in LCCman and GWP for the waste inlet is explained by the higher price for spare doors (around 18% of total cost) and the environmental impact of producing them being less than 2%.

    “This is explained by the higher price for the spare doors (representing around 18% of the total cost), while the environmental impact of producing them is less than 2%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The repair cost decrease for the waste inlet happened mainly because repair time decreased and lower labor costs were incurred, whereas environmental savings were mainly due to less Production S.

    “This happened mainly because the repair time decreased, and subsequently, lower labor costs were incurred, whereas the environmental savings were mainly due to less Production S.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.
    • Rests on an assumption: At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.
    • Rests on an assumption: The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Due to the relatively short lifetime of the products and the quality of the data provided by the companies, these uncertainties were minimized in the present study.

    “Due to the relatively short lifetime of the products and the quality of the data provided by the companies, these uncertainties were minimized in the present study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dealings with the same provider instead of investing time and money searching for a new provider will ease the business.

    “On the other hand, better environmental performance could possibly increase customer willingness to pay, as well as, possibly more importantly to companies, dealings with the same provider instead of investing time and money searching for a new provider will ease the business [35,63].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [35] Sakao, 2007, Service Engineering: A novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product, J. Clean. Prod. source
    • cites [63] Sakao, 2009, Quality engineering for early stage of environmentally conscious design, TQM J. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The cumulative effects of implementing changes to several products have not been presented in this research, which is an important limitation to what can be concluded regarding the economic viability of the circular offering.

    “These effects have not been presented in this research, which is an important limitation to what can be concluded regarding the economic viability of the circular offering.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other barriers, such as a hesitant company culture, might block financially viable solutions from being implemented.

    “Other barriers, such as a hesitant company culture, might block financially viable solutions from being implemented (ibid.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (ibid.)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The cumulative effect of implementing changes to several products will also be important for companies.

    “LCC has an offering perspective; the cumulative effect will also be important for companies implementing changes to several products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    If companies decided to lower the price due to a decrease in LCC_man, this action might lead to a primary rebound effect where customers consume more of the product.

    “Furthermore, if the companies decided to lower the price due to a decrease in LCC man , this action might lead to a primary rebound effect [57] where customers consume more of the product.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Prolonging the lifetime of passive durable products through the addition of services can have significant environmental benefits while also being a feasible and cost-reducing circular measure for companies to implement.

    “Therefore, the quantified findings from the five case products demonstrate that prolonging the lifetime of passive durable products through the addition of services can have significant environmental benefits while also being a feasible and cost-reducing circular measure for companies to implement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Wider rebound effects require broader economy-wide assessments.

    “Wider rebound effects, such as the effect of a larger supply of offerings on the market and the effect of more available disposable income [57], were not relevant to discuss with the companies and require broader economy-wide assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol. source
75 of 75
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Companies need solutions that are economically viable and can be implemented in a short-time perspective without major resources or restructuring of the existing supply chain.

    “However, in the absence or in wait of such policies and actions, and to overcome the aforementioned barriers, companies need solutions that are economically viable and can be implemented in a short-time perspective without the input of major resources or restructuring of the existing supply chain.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Prolonging the lifetime of passive durable products through PSS is not as complex as other circular economy strategies.

    “We propose that prolonging the lifetime of passive durable products through PSS could be such a solution because it is not as complex as other CE strategies, e.g., the creation of sharing platforms or constant administration of active product or completely redesigning the offering as advocated by result-oriented services.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The number of re-uses of the products estimated by suppliers is an accurate representation of what could be, or already is, implemented.

    “The number of re-uses of the products in the original study was estimated by the suppliers, and this number was assumed to be an accurate representation of what could be, or already is, implemented.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No standardized method currently exists for tracking the number of remanufacturing cycles a given product has undergone.

    “However, no standardized method currently exists for tracking the number of remanufacturing cycles a given product has undergone.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Labor incurs no extra environmental burden because people cause the same environmental impact irrespective of whether they work or not.

    “The notion is that labor incurs no extra environmental burden since people cause the same environmental impact, irrespective of whether they work or not (e.g., for housing, eating and other activities).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each pole is expected to maintain a good condition for 10 events.

    “Each pole is expected to maintain a good condition for 10 events.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The tent frame and weights are estimated to be used 10 times before EOL.

    “The tent frame and weights are also estimated to be used 10 times before EOL.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    At EOL, metal parts are sent to recycling, while textile and fiberglass parts are sent to incineration with energy recovery.

    “At the EOL, the metal parts are assumed to be sent to recycling, while the textile and fiberglass parts are sent to incineration with energy recovery.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The durable components of the beach flag and event tent were reused 9 times during product lifetime.

    “In the present study, it was assumed that the durable components of the beach flag and event tent were reused 9 times during product lifetime, and for that reason, this parameter was varied in the sensitivity analysis.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The metal parts would be sent to recycling, and the wood parts would be sent to incineration at the EOL of the product.

    “It was assumed that the metal parts would be sent to recycling, and the wood parts would be sent to incineration at the EOL of the product.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The inlet door breaks down the most often and incurs the highest repair costs during the service contract.

    “The inlet door (Figure 7, right) breaks down the most often and, therefore, incurs the highest repair costs during the service contract.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components of the waste inlet.

    “Similar supply chains were assumed for the other components.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At the end of life of the waste inlet, the metal parts are sent to recycling.

    “At the EOL of the product, the metal parts are sent to recycling.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.

    “The steel for the inlet's body is produced in Sweden.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Research on extending the lifetime of products to reduce life cycle costs remains limited and usually includes active products.

    “Such research remains limited and usually includes active products”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Revenues depend on how circular offerings are priced and what customers are willing to pay for them.

    “Revenues, for example, depend on how the circular offerings are priced and, eventually, what customers are willing to pay for them.”
16 of 16

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Waste-inlet door count allows only two replacements

    Minor

    The sensitivity-analysis description says the door is replaced three times during the inlet's lifetime. Table 3 instead counts one original door and two spare doors for the circular offering, allowing only two replacements.

  • Conclusion excludes the recycling bin's 38% GWP reduction

    Minor

    The conclusion says that every case other than the waste inlet achieved a 45-72% GWP reduction. Earlier, the recycling bin's GWP reduction is reported as 38%.

  • Criterion for beneficial lifetime extension is reversed

    Minor

    The stated criterion says avoided production impacts must be lower than the impacts of extending lifetime. That conflicts with the paper's later criterion that extension activities must not outweigh the environmental benefits.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaddoura, M., Kambanou, M. L., Tillman, A.-M., & Sakao, T.
Affiliations
  • CIRAIG (CA)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Kaddoura, Mohamad
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-09-04
Volume
11
Issue
18
Pages
4819
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972179077
Cited by
74
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
VINNOVA (2016-03267)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
product-service systems, product life extension, repair, refurbishment, reuse, circular economy, global warming potential, life cycle cost analysis, environmental impact reduction, economic feasibility, service-oriented business models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review