Cited by 87Green IT and SustainabilityEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityPhotovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital transformation—life cycle assessment of digital services, multifunctional devices and cloud computing

Open access

Abstract

The substitution of material-based services with digital services—for example films or music—alters the environmental impact of our everyday activities and shifts visible material use to less visible digital services. A holistic life cycle assessment (LCA) of digital transformation requires the assessment of information and communication technology (ICT) with its wide range of multifunctional devices as well as substitution and summation effects caused by new services enabled by modern ICT. The 73rd Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment (DF LCA) was held on 21 November 2019 to discuss the environmental implications of digital transformation in view of the effective as well as the potential environmental impacts. While currently being a small but already relevant contributor to the overall greenhouse gas emissions, the relevance of the ICT sector is predicted to grow rapidly within the next 5 to 10 years (Belkhir & Elmeligi, 2018). This 1-day forum offered the possibility to discuss current as well as potential future implications of devices as well as digital services on the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-020-01801-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upgrades to AI-enabled consumer devices require natural resources for manufacturing and for processing user data and responding to queries in real time.

    “However, these upgrades come with a price in terms of the natural resources required to manufacture them, as well as to process user data and respond to user queries in real-time [58].”

    From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Discussion and conclusions (section 6; page not available) links electronic-device manufacturing to raw-material demand and cloud-server operation to energy consumption. The Digital transformation and environment section (section 2; page not available) also identifies impacts from processing data in data centres. The paper does not specifically address AI-enabled device upgrades or the resources required to answer user queries in real time. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Aebischer B, Hilty LM (2015). The energy demand of ICT: a historical perspective and current methodological challenges · DOI
  2. Belkhir L, Elmeligi A (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations. J Clean Prod 177:448–463 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bieser J, Hilty L (2018a). An approach to assess indirect environmental effects of digitalization based on a time-use perspective. In Proceedings of EnviroInfo 2018. Munich, Germany. · DOI
  4. Bieser J, Hilty L (2018b) Assessing indirect environmental effects of information and communication technology (ICT): a systematic literature review. Sustainability 10(8):2662 · DOI
  5. Cabernard L, Pfister S, Hellweg S (2019) A new method for analyzing sustainability performance of global supply chains and its application to material resources. Sci Total Environ 684:164–177 · DOI
  6. Coroama VC, Hilty LM, Birtel M (2012) Effects of internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions. Telematics Inform 29(4):362–374 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Falke A, Höck M (2019) Ex-ante life cycle assessment of bioleaching in indium recovery from LCD-waste. MRS Advances 4(35):1949–1955 · DOI
  8. Ferreboeuf H, Efoui-Hess M, Kahraman Z (2019) Lean ICT - towards digital sobriety. The Shift Project, Paris, France
  9. Hilty L, Bieser J (2017) Opportunities and risks of digitalization for climate protection in Switzerland. University of Zurich, Zurich
  10. Hischier R, Wäger PA (2015). The transition from desktop computers to tablets: a model for increasing resource efficiency? In Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Bd. 310, S. 243–256). Springer, Switzerland · DOI
  11. Kern E, Hilty LM, Guldner A, Maksimov YV, Filler A, Gröger J, Naumann S (2018) Sustainable software products—towards assessment criteria for resource and energy efficiency. Futur Gener Comput Syst 86:199–210 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Koomey J, Berard S, Sanchez M, Wong H (2011) Implications of historical trends in the electrical efficiency of computing. IEEE Ann Hist Comput 33(3):46–54 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Preist C, Schien D, Shabajee P (2019) Evaluating sustainable interaction design of digital services: the case of YouTube. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, pp 1–12
  14. Sidos M, Fernique C, Fraisse T, Amphoux A, Vateau C, Bordage F, Prunel D, Domon F (2020) GreenConcept action white paper (Livre Blanc de l’action GreenConcept). Greenconcept - écoconception numérique, Blagnac, France

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Itten, R., Hischier, R., Andrae, A. S. G., Bieser, J. C. T., Cabernard, L., Falke, A., Ferreboeuf, H., Hilty, L. M., Keller, R. L., Lees-Perasso, E., Preist, C., & Stucki, M.
Affiliations
  • ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
  • Empa (CH)
  • Huawei Technologies (Sweden) (SE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • TU Bergakademie Freiberg (DE)
  • Bureau Veritas (France) (FR)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Itten, René
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2020-08-12
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
2093-2098
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
OpenAlex
W3048515427
Cited by
87
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (407340_185630)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Keywords
digital transformation, digital services, information and communication technologies, multifunctional devices, cloud computing, environmental impact, greenhouse gas emissions, substitution effect, material utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review