Cited by 169Green IT and SustainabilityConferences and Exhibitions ManagementEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Effects of Internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions

Open access
Coroama, Vlad C., Hilty, Lorenz M., Birtel, Martin·2012·Telematics and Informatics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2011.11.006

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Virtual conference meetings have a GHG abatement potential of 37 to 50% compared to an on-site conference.

    “The results indicate a GHG abatement potential of 37 to 50% compared to an on-site conference.”

    From Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing? (2020) · cites this paper as [137]

    The Abstract reports 37% and 50% reductions compared with two single-site alternatives. Those figures are for travel-related GHG emissions from a two-site conference, not for all emissions or virtual conferences generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The substitution of e-goods for physical goods has not proven to yield an overall reduction of energy consumption.

    “While there are examples of successful and dematerializing digital substitutions such as partly virtualized conferences [131], the substitution of e-goods for physical goods (e.g., e-books instead of physical books) has not proven to yield an overall reduction of energy consumption [132].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wohlgemuth, B. Page, K. Voigt (Eds.), Environmental Informatics and Industrial Environmental Protection: Concepts, Methods and Tools, 2009, pp 353-361.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coroama, V. C., Hilty, L. M., & Birtel, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Empa (CH)
Corresponding author
Hilty, Lorenz M.
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
362-374
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100365338
Cited by
169
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Cisco Systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conferences and Exhibitions Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
greenhouse gas emissions, videoconferencing, conference travel, intercontinental travel, participant satisfaction, energy efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review