Cited by 51Environmental Impact and SustainabilityExtraction and Separation ProcessesPhotovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

Quantifying the life-cycle health impacts of a cobalt-containing lithium-ion battery

Open access
Arvidsson, Rickard, Chordia, Mudit, Nordelöf, Anders·2022·The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been criticized for contributing to negative social impacts along their life cycles, especially child labor and harsh working conditions during cobalt extraction. This study focuses on human health impacts — arguably the most fundamental of all social impacts. The aim is to quantify the potential life-cycle health impacts of an LIB cell of the type nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC 811) in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALY), as well as to identify hotspots and ways to reduce the health impacts. Methods A cradle-to-gate attributional life-cycle assessment study is conducted with the functional unit of one LIB cell and human health as the sole endpoint considered. The studied LIB is produced in a large-scale “gigafactory” in Sweden, the cobalt sulfate for the cathode is produced in China, and the cobalt raw material is sourced from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Potential health impacts from both emissions and occupational accidents are quantified in terms of DALY, making this an impact pathway (or type II) study with regard to social impact assessment. Two scenarios for fatality rates in the artisanal cobalt mining in the DRC are considered: a high scenario at 2000 fatalities/year and a low scenario at 65 fatalities/year. Results Applying the high fatality rate, occupational accidents in the artisanal cobalt mining in the DRC contribute notably to the total life-cycle health impacts of the LIB cell (13%). However, emissions from production of nickel sulfate (used in the cathode) and of copper foil (the anode current collector) contribute even more (30% and 20%, respectively). These contributions are sensitive to the selected time horizon of the life-cycle assessment, with longer or shorter time horizons leading to considerably increased or decreased health impacts, respectively. Conclusions In order to reduce the health impacts of the studied LIB, it is recommended to (i) investigate the feasibility of replacing the copper foil with another material able to provide anode current collector functionality, (ii) reduce emissions from metal extraction (particularly nickel and copper), (iii) increase the recycled content of metals supplied to the LIB manufacturing, and (iv) improve the occupational standards in artisanal mining in the DRC, in particular by reducing fatal accidents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-022-02084-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cobalt sulfate LCI dataset indicates a consumption of about 15 kg of diesel per ton of mined ore based on primary data from a copper-cobalt mine in the DRC.

    “The cobalt sulfate LCI dataset indicates a consumption of about 15 kg of diesel per ton of mined ore based on primary data from a copper-cobalt mine in the DRC.”
  • For cobalt sulfate, a medium mitigation potential is reported due to the high amount of fuel used by processing equipment in mining operations in the analyzed production route.

    “For cobalt sulfate, a medium mitigation potential is reported due to the high amount of fuel used by processing equipment in mining operations in the analyzed production route. 40,41”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 51

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Al Barazi S, Näher U, Vetter S, Schütte P, Liedtke M, Baier M, Franken G (2017) Cobalt from the DR Congo -potential, risks and sig- nificance for the global cobalt market, vol. 53 Commodity Top News. Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover Amnesty International (2013) Profits and loss. Mining and human richts in Katanga, Democratic Republic of the Congo, London Amnesty International and Afrewatch (2016) "This is what we die for". Human rights abuses in the Democratic Rebublic of the Congo power the global trade in cobalt. London
  2. Dai Q, Kelly JC, Elgowainy A (2018) Cobalt life cycle analysis update for the GREET® model. Argonne National Laboratory de Haan J, Geenen S (2016) Mining cooperatives in Eastern DRC The interplay between historical power relations and formal institu- tions. Extr Ind Soc 3(3):823-831
  3. Elenge MM, Aubry J-C, Jacob L, De Brouwer C (2011) Heavy metal in hair samples of 109 non-industrial (miners) population in Katanga. Sante 21(1):41-46
  4. MacDonald A, Pokharel K (2020) Many miners die, and it never shows up in safety data. The Wall Street Journal. https:// www. wsjcom/ artic les/ many-miners-die-and-it-never-shows-up-in-safety-data-11582 815186
  5. Shengo LM, Kitobo WS, Kime MB, Mambwe MP, Nyembo TK (2020) Mineralogical variations with the mining depth in the congo cop- perbelt: technical and environmental challenges in the hydromet- allurgical processing of copper and cobalt ores. J Sustain Min 19(2):96-114
  6. Sovacool BK (2019) The precarious political economy of cobalt: bal- ancing prosperity, poverty, and brutality in artisanal and industrial mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Extr Ind Soc 6(3):915-939

Authors
Arvidsson, R., Chordia, M., & Nordelöf, A.
Affiliations
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Arvidsson, Rickard
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2022-08
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1106-1118
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
OpenAlex
W4291069434
Cited by
51
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Energimyndigheten (50095-1)
  • Swedish Electromobility Center
  • Chalmers University of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, cobalt mining, artisanal mining, occupational accidents, disability-adjusted life years, human health effects, copper emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo, gigafactories, social impact assessment, life cycle emissions, metal recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review