Cited by 17Environmental Impact and SustainabilityWater Resources and SustainabilityWater resources management and optimization

Revising regionalized water scarcity characterization factors for selected watersheds along the hyper-arid Peruvian coast using the AWARE method

Sanchez-Matos, Joan, Andrade, Edilene Pereira, Vázquez-Rowe, Ian·2023·The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-023-02195-5

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanchez-Matos, J., Andrade, E. P., & Vázquez-Rowe, I.
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2023-07-17
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1447-1465
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
OpenAlex
W4384522566
Cited by
17
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resources and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
groundwater scarcity, environmental flows, climate change scenarios, grape production, avocado production, groundwater overexploitation, Lima

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review